, Volume 179, Issue 3, pp 662–672 | Cite as

Influence of sex and estrous cyclicity on conditioned cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in rats

  • Rita A. Fuchs
  • K. Allison Evans
  • Ritu H. Mehta
  • Jordan M. Case
  • Ronald E. See
Original Investigation



Sex differences have been reported in physiological and behavioral responses to cocaine, but it is unclear whether sex differences exist in conditioned-cued relapse to cocaine seeking after prolonged abstinence. Furthermore, the role of estrous cyclicity in conditioned-cued relapse has not been investigated.


We assessed the influence of sex and estrous cyclicity on conditioned-cued reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in Sprague–Dawley rats.


Rats were trained to self-administer intravenous cocaine (unconditioned stimulus, US; 0.25, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, or 1.0 mg/kg per infusion) paired with light+tone conditioned stimuli (CSs) and were subsequently tested for the ability of the CSs to reinstate extinguished cocaine seeking (i.e., nonreinforced lever responding).


Females exhibited more responding on the cocaine-paired lever during self-administration and extinction than males. Subsequently, males exhibited equally robust conditioned-cued reinstatement of extinguished drug-seeking behavior independent of cocaine training dose. Males and females trained on 0.4–0.6 mg/kg cocaine reinstated to a similar extent. However, females trained on the lowest dose (0.25 mg/kg) exhibited less reinstatement than males, and the source of this effect was the absence of reinstatement in estrous females. In addition, independent of estrous state, females trained on the highest dose (1.0 mg/kg) exhibited less reinstatement than males.


While males and females are equally responsive to cocaine-paired CSs when the conditions for CS–US association are optimal, females appear to attribute less motivational significance to the CS when it presumably acquires weaker motivational salience because of (a) a low cocaine dose or (b) weaker CS–US contiguity due to the prolonged effects of a high cocaine dose.


Sex Estrous cycle Cocaine Self-administration Extinction Reinstatement Conditioned stimuli 



We thank Drs. Rebecca Craft and Heather Bimonte-Nelson for generously sharing their protocols for staining and analyzing vaginal smears. We also thank Macon Parker and J. Matthew Edwards for providing excellent technical assistance. This research was supported by the Medical University of South Carolina Specialized Center for Research on Sex and Gender Factors Affecting Women’s Health P50 grant DA 16511.


  1. Avants SK, Margolin A, Kosten TR, Cooney NL (1995) Differences between responders and nonresponders to cocaine cues in the laboratory. Addict Behav 20:215–224Google Scholar
  2. Bowman BP, Vaughan SR, Walker QD, Davis SL, Little PJ, Scheffler NM, Thomas BF, Kuhn CM (1999) Effects of sex and gonadectomy on cocaine metabolism in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 290:1316–1323Google Scholar
  3. Brady KT, Randall CL (1999) Gender differences in substance use disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 22:241–252Google Scholar
  4. Caine SB, Bowen CA, Yu G, Zuzga D, Negus SS, Mello NK (2004) Effect of gonadectomy and gonadal hormone replacement on cocaine self-administration in female and male rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:929–942Google Scholar
  5. Craft RM, Stratmann JA (1996) Discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in female versus male rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 42:27–37Google Scholar
  6. de Wit H, Stewart J (1981) Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat. Psychopharmacology 75:134–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Elman I, Karlsgodt KH, Gastfriend DR (2001) Gender differences in cocaine craving among non-treatment-seeking individuals with cocaine dependence. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 27:193–202Google Scholar
  8. Feder H (1981) Estrous cyclicity in mammals. In Adler N (ed) Neuroendocrinology of reproduction. Physiology and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp 280–289Google Scholar
  9. Festa ED, Russo SJ, Gazi FM, Niyomchai T, Kemen LM, Lin SN, Foltz R, Jenab S, Quinones-Jenab V (2004) Sex differences in cocaine-induced behavioral responses, pharmacokinetics, and monoamine levels. Neuropharmacology 46:672–687Google Scholar
  10. Fiorentine R, Anglin MD, Gil-Rivas V, Taylor E (1997) Drug treatment: explaining the gender paradox. Subst Use Misuse 32:653–678Google Scholar
  11. Fuchs RA, See RE (2002) Basolateral amygdala inactivation abolishes conditioned stimulus- and heroin-induced reinstatement of extinguished heroin-seeking behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology 160:425–433Google Scholar
  12. Fuchs RA, Tran-Nguyen LT, Specio SE, Groff RS, Neisewander JL (1998) Predictive validity of the extinction/reinstatement model of drug craving. Psychopharmacology 135:151–160Google Scholar
  13. Glick SD, Hinds PA (1984) Sex differences in sensitization to cocaine-induced rotation. Eur J Pharmacol 99:119–121Google Scholar
  14. Griffin ML, Weiss RD, Mirin SM, Lange U (1989) A comparison of male and female cocaine abusers. Arch Gen Psychiatry 46:122–126Google Scholar
  15. Grimm JW, See RE (1997) Cocaine self-administration in ovariectomized rats is predicted by response to novelty, attenuated by 17-beta estradiol, and associated with abnormal vaginal cytology. Physiol Behav 61:755–761Google Scholar
  16. Hu M, Becker JB (2003) Effects of sex and estrogen on behavioral sensitization to cocaine in rats. J Neurosci 23:693–699Google Scholar
  17. Hu M, Crombag HS, Robinson TE, Becker JB (2004) Biological basis of sex differences in the propensity to self-administer cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:81–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilts CD, Gross RE, Ely TD, Drexler KP (2004) The neural correlates of cue-induced craving in cocaine-dependent women. Am J Psychiatry 161:233–241Google Scholar
  19. Kippin TE, Fuchs RA, Mehta RH, Case JM, See RE (2004) Sex and estrous cycle have opposite effects on cocaine-primed versus conditioned-cued reinstatement of cocaine-seeking in rats. Program No. 916.11 2004 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosten TA, Gawin FH, Kosten TR, Rounsaville BJ (1993) Gender differences in cocaine use and treatment response. J Subst Abuse Treat 10:63–66Google Scholar
  21. Kruzich PJ, Congleton KM, See RE (2001) Conditioned reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior with a discrete compound stimulus classically conditioned with intravenous cocaine. Behav Neurosci 115:1086–1092Google Scholar
  22. Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (1999) Sex differences in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered cocaine and heroin in rats. Psychopharmacology 144:77–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (2000) Reinstatement of cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Psychopharmacology 148:196–200Google Scholar
  24. Lynch WJ, Arizzi MN, Carroll ME (2000) Effects of sex and the estrous cycle on regulation of intravenously self-administered cocaine in rats. Psychopharmacology 152:132–139Google Scholar
  25. Lynch WJ, Roth ME, Mickelberg JL, Carroll ME (2001) Role of estrogen in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered cocaine in female rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68:641–646Google Scholar
  26. Meil WM, See RE (1996) Conditioned cued recovery of responding following prolonged withdrawal from self-administered cocaine in rats: an animal model of relapse. Behav Pharmacol 7:754–763Google Scholar
  27. McCance-Katz EF, Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ (1999) Gender differences in treatment-seeking cocaine abusers—implications for treatment and prognosis. Am J Addict 8:300–311Google Scholar
  28. McKay JR, Rutherford MJ, Cacciola JS, Kabasakalian-McKay R, Alterman AI (1996) Gender differences in the relapse experiences of cocaine patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 184:616–622Google Scholar
  29. Mello NK, Mendelson JH (1997) Cocaine’s effects on neuroendocrine systems: clinical and preclinical studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:571–599Google Scholar
  30. Negrete JC, Emil S (1992) Cue-evoked arousal in cocaine users: a study of variance and predictive value. Drug Alcohol Depend 30:187–192Google Scholar
  31. Panlilio LV, Katz JL, Pickens RW, Schindler CW (2003) Variability of drug self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 167:9–19Google Scholar
  32. Rescorla RA (1967) Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychol Rev 74:71–80Google Scholar
  33. Robbins SJ, Ehrman RN, Childress AR, O’Brien CP (1999) Comparing levels of cocaine cue reactivity in male and female outpatients. Drug Alcohol Depend 53:223–230Google Scholar
  34. Roberts DC, Bennett SA, Vickers GJ (1989) The estrous cycle affects cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule in rats. Psychopharmacology 98:408–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. See RE (2002) Neural substrates of conditioned-cued relapse to drug-seeking behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71:517–529Google Scholar
  36. Shalev U, Grimm JW, Shaham Y (2002) Neurobiology of relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking: a review. Pharmacol Rev 54:1–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Skjoldager P, Winger G, Woods JH (1991) Analysis of fixed-ratio behavior maintained by drug reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 56:331–343Google Scholar
  38. Stewart J (1992) Conditioned stimulus control of the expression of sensitization of the behavioral activating effects of opiate and stimulant drugs. In: Gormezano I, Wasserman EA (eds) Learning and memory: the behavioral and biological substrates. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 129–151Google Scholar
  39. van Haaren F, Meyer ME (1991) Sex differences in locomotor activity after acute and chronic cocaine administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 39:923–927CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Weiss F, Maldonado-Vlaar CS, Parsons LH, Kerr TM, Smith DL, Ben-Shahar O (2000) Control of cocaine-seeking behavior by drug-associated stimuli in rats: effects on recovery of extinguished operant-responding and extracellular dopamine levels in amygdala and nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4321–4326Google Scholar
  41. Westermeyer J, Boedicker AE (2000) Course, severity, and treatment of substance abuse among women versus men. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 26:523–535Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita A. Fuchs
    • 1
  • K. Allison Evans
    • 1
  • Ritu H. Mehta
    • 1
  • Jordan M. Case
    • 1
  • Ronald E. See
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and NeuroscienceMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations