Local glutamate receptor antagonism in the rat prefrontal cortex disrupts response inhibition in a visuospatial attentional task
- 467 Downloads
Converging evidence implicates discrete areas of the rat prefrontal cortex in the modulation of different aspects of attention and executive control. Furthermore, the pharmacology of these behaviours has been relatively well characterised for the monoamine systems in a task of visuospatial attention, but it is not known how glutamate receptor antagonism in discrete regions of the prefrontal cortex affects attentional performance.
To investigate the role of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism in the prelimbic and infralimbic cortices (within the same animals) on performance of the five-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT), which assesses visuospatial attention and response inhibition.
Following training on the 5CSRTT, rats were implanted with bilateral guide cannulae aimed at the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Rats received micro infusions of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist 3-[(R)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl]-propyl-1-phosphonic acid [(R)-CPP; dissolved in saline to give 10 ng and 50 ng per side] into the prelimbic cortex, then three more infusions (saline, 10 ng and 50 ng per side) into the infralimbic cortex, in a counterbalanced design. They were then tested on a version of the task identical to that used in training.
(R)-CPP microinfusions impaired accuracy and increased omissions across both cortical regions. (R)-CPP microinfusions robustly increased premature responding only when infused into the infralimbic, but not prelimbic, cortex.
These results indicate that NMDA receptor neurotransmission in the infralimbic cortex is necessary for control of impulsive responding on the 5CSRTT. These results suggest a dissociable role for prefronto-cortical glutamatergic systems in response inhibition, which appear to be functionally localised to the ventromedial infralimbic area of the mPFC.
KeywordsNMDA receptor Impulsivity Infralimbic cortex Prelimbic cortex R-CPP Schizophrenia
The authors wish to thank Kristjan Lääne, Kim Hellemans, Mercedes Arroyo and David Theobald for technical assistance, and Rudolf Cardinal for statistical assistance and comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme grant and completed within the MRC Centre for Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience. E.R.M. was supported by a Gates Cambridge Scholarship.
- Birrell JM, Brown VJ (2000) Medial frontal cortex mediates perceptual attentional set-shifting in the rat. J Neurosci 20:4320–4324Google Scholar
- Cardinal RN, Aitken MRF (2001) Whisker, version 2.2. http://www.whiskercontrol.com
- Carli M, Robbins TW, Evenden JL, Everitt BJ (1983) Effects of lesions to ascending noradrenergic neurones on performance of a 5-choice serial reaction task in rats; implications for theories of dorsal noradrenergic bundle function based on selective attention and arousal. Behav Brain Res 9(3):361-380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carli M, Baviera M, Invernizzi RW, Balducci C (2004) The serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors antagonist M100907 prevents impairment in attentional performance by NMDA receptor blockade in the rat prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1637–1647Google Scholar
- Chudasama Y, Passetti F, Rhodes SE, Lopian D, Desai A, Robbins TW (2003) Dissociable aspects of performance on the 5-choice serial reaction time task following lesions of the dorsal anterior cingulate, infralimbic and orbitofrontal cortex in the rat: differential effects on selectivity, impulsivity and compulsivity. Behav Brain Res 146:105–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chudasama Y, Robbins TW (2004) Psychopharmacological approaches to modulating attention in the five-choice serial reaction time task: implications for schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 174:86–98Google Scholar
- Cochran W, Cox G (1957) Experimental designs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Higgins GA, Ballard TM, Huwyler J, Kemp JA, Gill R (2003a) Evaluation of the NR2B-selective NMDA receptor antagonist Ro 63-1908 on rodent behaviour: evidence for an involvement of NR2B NMDA receptors in response inhibition. Neuropharmacology 44:324–341Google Scholar
- Howell D (1997) Statistical methods for psychology, 4th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
- Huynh H, Feldt L (1970) Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated-measures designs have exact F-statistic distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 65:1582–1589Google Scholar
- Jentsch JD, Tran A, Le D, Youngren KD, Roth RH (1997b) Subchronic phencyclidine administration reduces mesoprefrontal dopamine utilization and impairs prefrontal cortical-dependent cognition in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 17:92–99Google Scholar
- Kolb B (1990) Prefrontal cortex. In: Kolb B, Tees R (eds) The cerebral cortex of the rat. MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp 437–458Google Scholar
- Lahti AC, Weiler MA, Tamara Michaelidis BA, Parwani A, Tamminga CA (2001) Effects of ketamine in normal and schizophrenic volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 25:455–467Google Scholar
- Leveque J-C, Macias W, Rajadhyaksha A, Carlson R, Barczak A, Kang S, Li X-M, Huganir R, Heckers S, Konradi C (2000) Intracellular modulation of NMDA receptor function by antipsychotic drugs. J Neurosci 20:4011–4020Google Scholar
- Low SJ, Roland CL (2004) Review of NMDA antagonist-induced neurotoxicity and implications for clinical development. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 42:1–14Google Scholar
- Mauchly J (1940) Significance test of sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann Math Stat 11:204–209Google Scholar
- Murphy ER, Baxter MG, Rodefer JS (2003) The effect of PDE10A inhibition on frontal cognitive performance in a subchronic phencyclidine model of schizophrenia. 448.2. Society for Neuroscience 33rd Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
- Orzack MH, Kornetsky C (1966) Attention dysfunction in chronic schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 14:323–326Google Scholar
- Paxinos G, Watson C (1998) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 4th edn. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ragozzino ME, Detrick S, Kesner RP (1999) Involvement of the prelimbic–infralimbic areas of the rodent prefrontal cortex in behavioral flexibility for place and response learning. J Neurosci 19:4585–4594Google Scholar
- Reid L, Egerton A, Morris B, Pratt J (2003) Acute PCP administration produces an attentional set shifting deficit and reduced neural activity in the medial frontal cortex of the rat. 940.11. Society for Neuroscience, 33rd Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
- Tamminga CA (1998) Schizophrenia and glutamatergic transmission. Crit Rev Neurobiol 12:21–36Google Scholar
- Verma A, Moghaddam B (1996) NMDA receptor antagonists impair prefrontal cortex function as assessed via spatial delayed alternation performance in rats: modulation by dopamine. J Neurosci 16:373–379Google Scholar
- Winstanley CA, Chudasama Y, Dalley JW, Theobald DE, Glennon JC, Robbins TW (2003) Intra-prefrontal 8-OH-DPAT and M100907 improve visuospatial attention and decrease impulsivity on the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 167:304–314Google Scholar
- Zajaczkowski W, Hetman M, Nikolaev E, Quack G, Danysz W, Kaczmarek L (2000) Behavioural evaluation of long-term neurotoxic effects of NMDA receptor antagonists. Neurotox Res 1:299–310Google Scholar
- Zilles K (1990) Anatomy of the neocortex: cytoarchitecture and myleoarchitecture. In: Kolb B, Tees R (eds) The cerebral cortex of the rat. MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp 77–112Google Scholar