Psychopharmacology

, Volume 178, Issue 2–3, pp 193–201

Impulsivity (delay discounting) as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self-administration in female rats

  • Jennifer L. Perry
  • Erin B. Larson
  • Jonathan P. German
  • Gregory J. Madden
  • Marilyn E. Carroll
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Previous research in humans suggests a relationship between drug abuse and impulsivity as shown by selection of a smaller immediate reward over a larger delayed reward. However, it is not clear whether impulsivity precedes drug abuse or drug abuse influences impulsivity.

Objective

The hypothesis of the present experiment was that rats selected for choosing smaller, immediate over larger, delayed food would acquire IV cocaine self-administration faster than those choosing larger, delayed food rewards.

Methods

Female rats were screened for locomotor activity and trained on a delay discounting procedure that allowed them access to two response levers and a food pellet dispenser. Under a fixed-ratio (FR) 1 schedule, responding on one lever resulted in immediate delivery of one 45 mg pellet, while responding on the other lever resulted in delivery of three 45 mg pellets after a variable delay that increased after responses on the delay lever and decreased after responses on the immediate lever. For each rat, a mean adjusted delay (MAD) was calculated for each daily session, and stability was defined as MADs varying less than 5 s across 5 days. Based on their average MADs, rats were separated into low impulsive (LoI) and high impulsive (HiI) groups, implanted with an indwelling IV catheter, and trained to lever press for cocaine (0.2 mg/kg) under an FR1 schedule.

Results

There were no differences in locomotor activity between the LoI and HiI groups; however, a greater percentage of the HiI group acquired cocaine self-administration, and they did so at a significantly faster rate than the LoI rats.

Conclusions

Performance on the delay discounting model of impulsivity predicted vulnerability to subsequent acquisition of cocaine self-administration.

Keywords

Cocaine Delay-discounting Food Fixed-ratio Impulsivity Rats Self-administration 

References

  1. Ainslie G (1975) Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull 82:463–496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell SM, Gosnell BA, Krahn DD, Meisch RA (1994) Ethanol reinforcement and its relationship to saccharin preference in Wistar rats. Alcohol 11:141–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ (1999) Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146:447–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady KT, Myrick H, McElroy S (1998) The relationship between substance use disorders, impulse control disorders, and pathological aggression. Am J Addict 7:221–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell UC, Carroll ME (2000) Acquisition of drug self-administration: environmental and pharmacological interventions. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 8:312–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardinal RN, Daw N, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2002) Local analysis of behaviour in the adjusting-delay task for assessing choice of delayed reinforcement. Neural Netw 15:617–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll ME, Lac ST (1993) Autoshaping IV cocaine self-administration in rats: effects of nondrug alternative reinforcers on acquisition. Psychopharmacology 110:5–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll ME, Lac ST (1997) Acquisition of IV amphetamine and cocaine self-administration in rats as a function of dose. Psychopharmacology 129:206–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll ME, Lac ST (1998) Dietary additives and the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 137:81–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll ME, Morgan AD, Lynch WJ, Campbell UC, Dess NK (2002) Intravenous cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats selectively bred for differential saccharin intake: phenotype and sex differences. Psychopharmacology 161:304–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Clement Y, Chapouthier G (1998) Biological bases of anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:623–633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coffey SF, Gudleski GD, Saladin ME, Brady KT (2003) Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 11:18–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. DeSousa NJ, Bush DE, Vaccarino FJ (2000) Self-administration of intravenous amphetamine is predicted by individual differences in sucrose feeding in rats. Psychopharmacology 148:52–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. de Wit H, Richards JB (2004) Dual determinants of drug use in humans: reward and impulsivity. Nebr Symp Motiv 50:19–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. de Wit H, Enggasser JL, Richards JB (2002) Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:813–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixon MR, Horner MJ, Guercio J (2003) Self-control and the preference for delayed reinforcement an example in brain injury. J Appl Behav Anal 36:371–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gahtan E, Labounty LP, Wyvell C, Carroll ME (1996) The relationships among saccharin consumption, oral ethanol, and IV cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:919–925Google Scholar
  18. Giancola PR, Mezzich AC (2003) Executive functioning, temperament, and drug use involvement in adolescent females with a substance use disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44:857–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Giordano LA, Bickel WK, Loewenstein G, Jacobs EA, Marsch L, Badger GJ (2002) Mild opioid deprivation increases the degree that opioid-dependent outpatients discount delayed heroin and money. Psychopharmacology 163:174–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gosnell BA (2000) Sucrose intake predicts rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Psychopharmacology 149:286–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gosnell BA, Lane KE, Bell SM, Krahn DD (1995) Intravenous morphine self-administration by rats with low versus high saccharin preferences. Psychopharmacology 117:248–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Haney M, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H, Piazza PV (1995) Social stress increases the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in male and female rats. Brain Res 698:46–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirby KN, Petry NM (2004) Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. Addiction 99:461–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK (1999) Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol Gen 128:78–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kollins SH (2002) Delay discounting is associated with substance use in college students. Addict Behav 27:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (1999) Sex differences in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered cocaine and heroin in rats. Psychopharmacology 144:77–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch WJ, Roth ME, Carroll ME (2002) Biological basis of sex differences in drug abuse: preclinical and clinical studies. Psychopharmacology 164:121–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Madden GJ, Petry NM, Badger GJ, Bickel WK (1997) Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 5:256–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mantsch JR, Ho A, Schlussman SD, Kreek MJ (2001) Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self-administration by rats under extended-access conditions are dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology 157:31–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazur JE (1987) An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: Commons ML, Mazur JE, Nevin JA, Rachlin H (eds) Qualitative analyses of behavior: the effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 55–73Google Scholar
  31. Mazur JE, Logue A (1978) Choice in a self-control paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 30:11–17Google Scholar
  32. McDonald J, Schleifer L, Richards JB, de Wit H (2003) Effects of THC on behavioral measures of impulsivity in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:1356–1365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Messing RB, Sparber SB (1985) Greater task difficulty amplifies the facilitatory effect of des-glycinamide arginine vasopressin on appetitively motivated learning. Behav Neurosci 99:1114–1119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer R (1976) Preferences over time. In: Raiffa H (ed) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York, pp 473–514Google Scholar
  35. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Peake PK (1988) The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. J Person Soc Psychol 54:687–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitchell S (1999) Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146:455–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Moeller FG, Dougherty DM, Barratt ES, Schmitz JM, Swann AC, Grabowski J (2001) The impact of impulsivity on cocaine use and retention in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat 21:193–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan AD, Anderson MM, Dess NK, Carroll ME (2004) Escalation of cocaine self-administration, progressive-ratio performance, and reinstatement in rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake. Psychopharmacology (in press)Google Scholar
  39. National Research Council (2003) Guidelines for the care and use of mammals in neuroscience and behavioral research. The National Academies, Washington, p 209Google Scholar
  40. Odum AL, Madden GJ, Badger GJ, Bickel WK (2000) Needle sharing in opioid-dependent outpatients: psychological processes underlying risk. Drug Alcohol Depend 60:259–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Odum AL, Madden GJ, Bickel WK (2002) Discounting of delayed health gains and losses by current, never- and ex-smokers of cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 4:295–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511–1513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Maccari S, Mormede P, Le Moal M, Simon H (1990) Individual reactivity to novelty predicts probability of amphetamine self-administration. Behav Pharmacol 1:339–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pietras CJ, Cherek DR, Lane SD, Tcheremissine OV, Steinberg JL (2003) Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice in adult humans. Psychopharmacology 170:390–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pitts RC, Febbo SM (2004) Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine’s effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action. Behav Proc 66:213–233Google Scholar
  46. Poulos CX, Le AD, Parker JL (1995) Impulsivity predicts individual susceptibility to high levels of alcohol self-administration. Behav Pharmacol 6:810–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Richards JB, Sabol KE, de Wit H (1999a) Effects of methamphetamine on the adjusting amount procedure, a model of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology 146:432–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Richards JB, Zhang L, Mitchell SH, de Wit H (1999b) Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol. J Exp Anal Behav 71:121–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Schweitzer J, Sulzer-Azaroff B (1988) Self-control: teaching tolerance for delay in impulsive children. J Exp Anal Behav 50:173–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tidey JW, Miczek KA (1997) Acquisition of cocaine self-administration after social stress: role of accumbens dopamine. Psychopharmacology 130:203–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wade TR, de Wit H, Richards JB (2000) Effects of dopaminergic drugs on delayed reward as a measure of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology 150:90–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wills TA, Vaccaro D, Benson G (1995) Coping and competence in adolescent alcohol and drug use. In: Wallander JL, Lawrence J (eds) Adolescent health problems: behavioral perspectives. Advances in pediatric psychology. Guilford, New York, pp 160–178Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Perry
    • 1
  • Erin B. Larson
    • 1
  • Jonathan P. German
    • 1
  • Gregory J. Madden
    • 2
  • Marilyn E. Carroll
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-Eau ClaireEau ClaireUSA

Personalised recommendations