Fine-tuning risperidone dosage for acutely exacerbated schizophrenia: clinical determinants
- First Online:
Risperidone doses for acute schizophrenia were rather high in most recent studies.
We tested a hypothesis that fine-tuning risperidone dosage to relieve side effects still yields efficacy. Clinical factors influencing the dosing were also determined.
One hundred and forty-six schizophrenia inpatients with acute exacerbation entered a prospective, 6-week, repeated measures study. Risperidone doses were titrated to 6 mg/day (if tolerable) within 7 days, but were lowered thereafter if adverse reactions appeared. Efficacy and safety were measured biweekly.
Forty-eight patients tolerated the 6-mg/day target dose well, while the other 98 received lower final doses (mean±SD=3.4±0.9 mg/day) to curtail adverse effects. At endpoint, 64.3% of the low-dose patients and 43.8% of the high-dose subjects responded to treatment [≥20% reduction in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score] (P=0.018). In detail, the low-dose individuals were significantly superior in percentage changes in the PANSS total and general-subscale scores at endpoint. The low-dose group also tended to improve more (albeit statistically insignificantly) in the PANSS positive and negative subscales and other efficacy measures. Compared to the patients with undifferentiated subtype, those with disorganized subtype received higher dosage by 0.90 mg/day, after controlling for other variables (P=0.008). Paranoid subtype was similar to undifferentiated subtype in drug doses. Patients with longer illness duration also showed a trend to use higher dosage (P=0.078).
These findings suggest that dosage adjustment to diminish side effects does not compromise risperidone response and that disorganized patients and perhaps patients with longer illness duration are prone to receive larger doses.
KeywordsDiagnosis subtype Disorganized subtype Dose Gender Risperidone Chinese
- American Psychiatric Association (1994) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Anderson C, True J, Ereshefsky L, Miller A (1994) Risperidone clinical efficacy: role of the metabolite 9-hydroxy-risperidone [abstract]. Psychopharmacol Bull 30:88Google Scholar
- Bouchard RH, Merette C, Pourcher E, Demers MF, Villeneuve J, Roy-Gagnon MH, Gauthier Y, Cliche D, Labelle A, Filteau MJ, Roy MA, Maziade M (2000) Longitudinal comparative study of risperidone and conventional neuroleptics for treating patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 20:295–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chouinard G, Ross-Chouinard A, Annable L, Jones BD (1980) The Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale [abstract]. Can J Neurol Sci 7:233Google Scholar
- Chouinard G, Jones B, Remington G, Bloom D, Addington D, Macewan GW, Labelle A, Beauclair L, Arnott W (1993) A Canadian multicenter placebo-controlled study of fixed doses of risperidone and haloperidol in the treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol 13:25–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collaborative Working Group on Clinical Trial Evaluations (1998) Clinical development of atypical antipsychotics: research design and evaluation. J Clin Psychiatry 59 (suppl 12):10–16Google Scholar
- Darby JK, Pasta DJ, Elfand L, Dabiri L, Clark L, Herbert J (1997) Risperidone dose and blood level variability: accumulation effects and interindividual and intraindividual variability in the nonresponder patient in the clinical practice setting. J Clin Psychopharmacol 17:478–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gutierrez-Esteinou R, Grebb JA (1997) Risperidone: an analysis of the first three years in general use. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 12 (suppl 4):3–10Google Scholar
- Guy W (1976) ECDEU Assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare publication (ADM) 76-338. National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Md., pp 217–222Google Scholar
- Honigfeld G, Klett G (1965) The Nurses’ Observation Scale for Inpatients Evaluation: a new scale for measuring improvement in chronic schizophrenia. J Clin Psychol 21:65–71Google Scholar
- Klieser E, Lehmann E, Kinzler E, Wurthmann C, Heinrich K (1995) Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of risperidone versus clozapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 15 (suppl 1):45–51Google Scholar
- Lane HY, Chang WH (1998) Risperidone-carbamazepine interactions: cytochrome P450 3A involved [letter]? J Clin Psychiatry 59:430–431Google Scholar
- Lane HY, Chang YC, Chang WH, Lin SK, Tseng YT, Jann MW (1999) Effects of gender and age on plasma levels of clozapine and its metabolites: analyzed by critical statistics. J Clin Psychiatry 60:36–40Google Scholar
- Marder SR, Meibach RC (1994) Risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 151:828–835Google Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS OnlineDoc(R), Version 8, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, N.C.Google Scholar
- Tran PV, Hamilton SH, Kuntz AJ, Potvin JH, Andersen SW, Beasley C Jr, Tollefson GD (1997) Double-blind comparison of olanzapine versus risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol 17:407–418Google Scholar
- Volavka J, Czobor P, Sheitman B, Lindenmayer JP, Citrome L, McEvoy JP, Cooper TB, Chakos M, Lieberman JA (2002) Clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in the treatment of patients with chronic schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Am J Psychiatry 159:255–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar