, Volume 172, Issue 4, pp 443–449

Sex differences in the acquisition of IV methamphetamine self-administration and subsequent maintenance under a progressive ratio schedule in rats

Original Investigation



Previous work indicates that female rats initiate cocaine use sooner than male rats and reach significantly higher break points (BPs) for a single injection of cocaine under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule compared to male rats.


The present study extends previous work examining sex differences to the acquisition of methamphetamine (METH) (0.02 mg/kg) and maintenance of METH-maintained responding under a PR schedule.


An automated priming procedure that has previously been shown to be sensitive to sex differences was used for the acquisition of drug self-administration. A PR schedule that has been shown to be sensitive in detecting sex differences in maintenance levels of cocaine-reinforced responding was used for the maintenance phase of the experiment.


A greater percentage of female rats met the acquisition criterion for METH (0.02 mg/kg) self-administration compared to male rats (55.6% versus 11.1%, respectively), and they did so at a significantly faster rate. Under stable fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) conditions (after acquisition and 5 days before the PR schedule) female rats responded for significantly more METH (0.02 mg/kg) infusions compared to males. Dose-response curves obtained under the PR schedule during maintenance indicated that female rats self-administered significantly more METH infusions compared to male rats.


These data suggest that female rats are more vulnerable to the acquisition of METH self-administration, and they are more motivated to self-administer METH compared to male rats under a PR schedule during the maintenance phase.


Acquisition Intravenous Maintenance Methamphetamine Rats Self-administration Sex differences 


  1. Becker JB (1999) Gender differences in dopaminergic function in striatum and nucleus accumbens. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64:803–812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cailhol S, Mormede P (1999) Strain and sex differences in the locomotor response and behavioral sensitization to cocaine in hyperactive rats. Brain Res 842:200–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroll ME, Boe IN (1982) Increased intravenous drug self-administration during deprivation of other reinforcers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 80:65–72Google Scholar
  4. Carroll ME, Lac ST (1993) Autoshaping IV cocaine self-administration in rats: effects of nondrug alternative reinforcers on acquisition. Psychopharmacology 110:5–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll ME, Campbell UC, Heideman P (2001) Ketoconazole suppresses food restriction-induced increases in heroin self-administration in rats: sex differences. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 9:307–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll ME, Morgan AD, Lynch WJ, Campbell UC, Dess NK (2002) Intravenous cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats selectively bred for differential saccharin intake: phenotype and sex differences. Psychopharmacology 161:304–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho AK, Melega WP (2002) Patterns of methamphetamine abuse and their consequences. J Addict Dis 21:21–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Depoortere RY, Li DH, Lane JD, Emmett-Oglesby MW (1993) Parameters of self-administration of cocaine in rats under a progressive-ratio schedule. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 45:539–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Donny EC, Caggiula AR, Rowell PP, Gharib MA, Maldovan V, Booth S, Mielke MM, Hoffman A, McCallum S (2000) Nicotine self-administration in rats: estrous cycle effects, sex differences and nicotinic receptor binding. Psychopharmacology 151:392–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujita I, Sindhu RK, Kikkawa Y (1995) Hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme imprinting in adult rat by neonatal benzo[a]pyrene administration. Pediatr Res 37:646–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukumura M, Cappon GD, Broening HW, Vorhees CV (1998) Methamphetamine-induced dopamine and serotonin reductions in neostriatum are not gender specific in rats with comparable hyperthermic responses. Neurotoxicol Teratol 20:441–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gehrke BJ, Harrod SB, Cass WA, Bardo MT (2003) The effect of neurotoxic doses of methamphetamine on methamphetamine-conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology 166:249–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Grasing K, Li Ning, Shaunteng H, Parrish C, Delich J, Glowa J (2003) A new progressive ratio schedule for support of morphine self-administration in opiate dependent rats. Psychopharmacology (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Haney M, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H, Piazza PV (1995) Social stress increases the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in male and female rats. Brain Res 698:46–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hecht GS, Spear NE, Spear LP (1999) Changes in progressive ratio responding for intravenous cocaine throughout the reproductive process in female rats. Dev Psychobiol 35:136–145Google Scholar
  16. Kato R, Yamazoe Y (1992) Sex-specific cytochrome P450 as a cause of sex- and species-related differences in drug toxicity. Toxicol Lett 64–65:661–667Google Scholar
  17. Klein LC, Popke JE, Grunberg NE (1997) Sex differences in effects of predictable and unpredictable footshock on fentanyl self-administration in rats. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 5:99–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (1999) Sex differences in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered cocaine and heroin in rats. Psychopharmacology 144:77–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (2000) Reinstatement of cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Psychopharmacology 148:196–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynch WJ, Arizzi MN, Carroll ME (2000) Effects of sex and the estrous cycle on regulation of intravenously self-administered cocaine in rats. Psychopharmacology 152:132–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynch WJ, Roth ME, Mickelberg JL, Carroll ME (2001) Role of estrogen in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered cocaine in female rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68:641–646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller DB, Ali SF, O’Callaghan JP, Laws SC (1998) The impact of gender and estrogen on striatal dopaminergic neurotoxicity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 844:153–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA). National estimates of substance use 1999. Scholar
  24. National Research Council (2003) National Academies Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Quinones-Jenab V, Ho A, Schlussman SD, Franck J, Kreek MJ (1999) Estrous cycle differences in cocaine-induced stereotypic and locomotor behaviors in Fisher rats. Behav Brain Res 101:15–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts DCS, Bennett SAL, Vickers GJ (1989) The estrous cycle affects cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule in rats. Psychopharmacology 98:408–411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Robinson TE, Becker JB, Presty SK (1982) Long-term facilitation of anphetamine-induced rotational behavior and striatal dopamine release produced by a single exposure to amphetamine: sex differences. Brain Res 253:231–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Roth ME, Casimir AG, Carroll ME (2002) Influence of estrogen in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered heroin in female rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 72:313–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan DE, Thomas PE, Levin W, Maines SL, Bandiera S, Reik LM (1993) Monoclonal antibodies of differentiating specificities as probes of cytochrome P450h (2C11). Arch Biochem Biophys 301:282–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schindler CW, Bross JG, Thorndike EB (2002) Gender differences in the behavioral effects of methamphetamine. Eur J Pharmacol 442:231–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shiiyama S, Soejima-Ohkuma T, Honda S, Kumagai Y, Cho AK, Yamada H, Oguri K, Yoshimura H. Major role of the CYP2C isozymes in deamination of amphetamine and benzphetamine: evidence for the quinidine-specific inhibition of the reactions catalysed by rabbit enzyme. Xenobiotica 27:379–387Google Scholar
  32. Sircar R, Kim D (1999) Female gonadal hormones differentially modulate cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in Fisher, Lewis, and Sprague-Dawley rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289:54–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stewart J, Woodside B, Shaham Y (1996) Ovarian hormones do not affect the initiation and maintenance of intravenous self-administration of heroin in the female rat. Psychobiology 24:154–159Google Scholar
  34. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Research Report Series (1998) Methamphetamine abuse and addiction. National Institute of Health (NIH) Publication number 98-4210Google Scholar
  35. Wagner GC, Tekirian TL, Cheo CT (1993) Sexual differences in sensitivity to methamphetamine toxicity. J Neural Transm Gen Sect 93:67–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Weeks JR (1972) Long-term intravenous infusion. In: Myers RD (ed) Methods in psychobiology. Academic Press, London, pp 155–168Google Scholar
  37. Yu YL, Wagner GC (1994) Influence of gonadal hormones on sexual differences in sensitivity to methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity. J Neural Transm Park Dis Dement Sect 8:215–221PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations