Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 170, Issue 4, pp 390–398 | Cite as

Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice in adult humans

  • Cynthia J. Pietras
  • Don R. Cherek
  • Scott D. Lane
  • Oleg V. Tcheremissine
  • Joel L. Steinberg
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Several studies with nonhumans and humans have shown that stimulants decrease impulsive choices on delay-to-reinforcement (self-control) procedures. Little is known, however, about the effects of the stimulant methylphenidate on choice for delayed reinforcers in humans.

Objectives

The present study was designed to investigate the effects of acute methylphenidate administrations on impulsive responding in adult humans on a delay-to-reinforcement task.

Methods

Eleven adult males with a history of criminal behavior but no history of attention–deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) participated. Impulsive responding was measured using an adjusting-delay procedure in which subjects were presented with repeated choices between a small amount of money delivered after a short delay and a larger amount of money delivered after a delay that adjusted as a function of previous choices. Subjects were exposed to four experimental sessions each day of participation and 60 min prior to the first daily session received placebo or 0.15, 0.30, or 0.60 mg/kg methylphenidate. Stable choice patterns were re-established between each methylphenidate dose.

Results

Individuals differed in their sensitivity to methylphenidate, but in over half of the subjects methylphenidate decreased impulsive (i.e., increased the number of self-control choices) and increased the delay to the large reinforcer. The largest increases in self-control choices tended to occur at the 0.30-mg/kg and 0.60-mg/kg doses, and the effects often persisted across multiple daily sessions. In six subjects, under at least one methylphenidate dose, the number of impulsive choices decreased to zero.

Conclusions

Acute methylphenidate administrations tended to decrease the number of impulsive choices in adult humans on an adjusting-delay procedure, although there were substantial individual differences in the sensitivity of choice to methylphenidate. In no case, however, did methylphenidate increase impulsive choices. These results are consistent with several recent laboratory studies with nonhumans and humans showing that stimulants increase preference for large, delayed reinforcers.

Keywords

Methylphenidate Stimulants Impulsivity Self-control Choice Human 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIH grant DA 10552 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The authors wish to thank Sheila White, Jennifer Sharon and Ehren Bradbury for their assistance.

References

  1. Ainslie GW (1974) Impulse control in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 21:485–489Google Scholar
  2. Barkley RA (1977) A review of stimulant drug research with hyperactive children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 18:137–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barratt ES (1985) Impulsiveness defined within a systems model of personality. In: Spielberger ED, Butcher JN (eds) Advances in personality assessment, vol 5. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 113–132Google Scholar
  4. Bickel WK, Marsch LA (2001) Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction 96:73–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown RT, Borden KA, Wynne ME, Schleser R, Clingerman SR (1986) Methylphenidate and cognitive therapy with ADD children: a methodological reconsideration. J Abnorm Child Psychol 14:481–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell M, Cueva JE, Adams PB (1999) Pharmacotherapy of impulsive-aggressive behavior. In: Cloninger CR (ed) Personality and psychopathology. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, pp 431–455Google Scholar
  7. Cardinal RN, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2000) The effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide, α-flupenthixol and behavioural manipulations on choice of signalled and unsignalled delayed reinforcement in rats. Psychopharmacology 152:362–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Charrier D, Thiébot MH (1996) Effects of psychotropic drugs on rats responding in an operant paradigm involving choice between delayed reinforcers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 54:149–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherek DR (1992) The point subtraction aggression paradigm (PSAP). University of Texas Press, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherek DR, Lane SD (1999a) Effects of d,l-fenfluramine on aggressive and impulsive responding in adult males with a history of conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology 146:473–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherek DR, Lane SD (1999b) Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity among violent and nonviolent female parolees. Biol Psychiatry 46:273–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cherek DR, Lane SD (2000) Fenfluramine effects on impulsivity in a sample of adults with and without history of conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology 152:149–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherek DR, Moeller FG, Dougherty DM, Rhoades H (1997) Studies of violent and nonviolent male parolees. II. Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity. Biol Psychiatry 41:523–529Google Scholar
  14. Cherek DR, Lane SD, Pietras CJ, Sharon J, Steinberg JL (2002) Acute effects of baclofen, a γ-aminobutyric acid-B agonist, on laboratory measures of aggressive and escape responses of adult male parolees with and without a history of conduct disorder. Psychopharmacology 164:160–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Wit H, Enggasser JL, Richards JB (2002) Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:813–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dougherty DM, Bjork JM, Marsh DM, Moeller FG (2000) A comparison between adults with conduct disorder and normal controls on a continuous performance test: differences in impulsive response characteristics. Psychol Rec 50:203–219Google Scholar
  17. Evenden JL (1999) Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology 146:348–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Evenden JL, Ryan CN (1996) The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 128:161–170Google Scholar
  19. Findling RL, Dogin JW (1998) Psychopharmacology of ADHD: children and adolescents. J Clin Psychiatry 59[Suppl 7]:42–49Google Scholar
  20. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1996) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders. Biometrics Research Department. State Psychiatric Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Flora SR, Pavlik WB (1992) Human self-control and the density of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 57:201–208Google Scholar
  22. Hinshaw SP, Lee SS (2000) Ritalin effects on aggression and antisocial behavior. In: Greenhill LL, Osman BB (eds) Ritalin: theory and practice, 2nd edn. Liebert, New York, pp 237–251Google Scholar
  23. Ito M, Nakamura K (1998) Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density. J Exp Anal Behav 69:87–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, Ryan N (1997) Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:980–988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Klein RG, Abikoff H, Klass E, Ganeles D, Seese LM, Pollack S (1997) Clinical efficacy of methylphenidate in conduct disorder with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54:1073–1080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuczenski R, Segal DS (2001) Locomotor effects of acute and repeated threshold doses of amphetamine and methylphenidate: relative roles of dopamine and norepinephrine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296:876–883PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Logue AW (1988) Research on self-control: an integrating framework. Behav Brain Sci 11:665–709Google Scholar
  28. Logue AW (2000) Self-control and health behavior. In: Bickel WK, Vuchinich RE (eds) Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics. Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp 167–192Google Scholar
  29. Logue AW, Peña-Correal TE, Rodriguez ML, Kabela E (1986) Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay. J Exp Anal Behav 46:159–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Logue AW, King GR, Chavarro A, Volpe JS (1990) Matching and maximizing in a self-control paradigm using human subjects. Learn Motivation 21:340–368Google Scholar
  31. Mazur JE, Logue AW (1978) Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 30:11–17Google Scholar
  32. Patrick KS, Mueller RA, Gualtieri CT, Breese GR (1987) Pharmacokinetics and actions of methylphenidate. In: Meltzer HY (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 1387–1395Google Scholar
  33. Rachlin H, Green L (1972) Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav 17:15–22Google Scholar
  34. Rapoport JI, Buchsbaum MS, Weingartner H, Zahn TP, Ludlow C, Mikkelsen EJ (1980) Dextroamphetamine. Its cognitive and behavioral effects in normal and hyperactive boys and normal men. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37:933–943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rapport MD, Stoner G, DuPaul GJ, Kelly KL, Tucker SB, Schoeler T (1988) Attention deficit disorder and methylphenidate: a multilevel analysis of dose-response effects on children's impulsivity across settings. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:60–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Riccio CA, Waldrop JJM, Reynolds CR, Lowe P (2001) Effects of stimulants on the continuous performance test (CPT): implications for CPT use and interpretation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 13:326–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Richards JB, Sabol KE, de Wit H (1999) Effects of methamphetamine on the adjusting amount procedure, a model of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology 146:432–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Robbins TW (1975) The potentiation of conditioned reinforcement by psychomotor stimulant drugs. A test of Hill's hypothesis. Psychopharmacologia 45:103–114Google Scholar
  39. Robbins TW (1978) The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effect of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology 58:79–87Google Scholar
  40. Shipley Boyle B (1967) The Shipley institute of living scale. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  41. Solanto MV (1998) Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration. Behav Brain Res 94:127–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Solanto MV (2002) Dopamine dysfunction in AD/HD: integrating clinical and basic neuroscience research. Behav Brain Res 130:65–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Solanto MV, Conners CK (1982) A dose-response and time-action analysis of autonomic and behavioral effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. Psychophysiology 19:658–667PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Solanto MV, Wender EH, Bartell SS (1997) Effects of methylphenidate and behavioral contingencies on sustained attention in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a test of the reward dysfunction hypothesis. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 7:123–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Solanto MV, Abikoff H, Sonuga-Barke E, Schachar R, Logan GD, Wigal T, Hechtman L, Hinshaw S, Turkel E (2001) The ecological validity of delay aversion and response inhibition as measures of impulsivity in AD/HD: a supplement to the NIHM multimodal treatment study of AD/HD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 29:215–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sonuga-Barke EJS, Taylor E, Sembi S, Smith J (1992) Hyperactivity and delay aversion. I. The effect of delay on choice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 33:387–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sostek AJ, Buchsbaum MS, Rapoport JL (1980) Effects of amphetamine on vigilance performance in normal and hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 8:491–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Spencer T, Wilens T, Biederman J, Faraone SV, Ablon JS, Lapey K (1995) A double-blind, crossover comparison of methylphenidate and placebo in adults with childhood-onset attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 52:434–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Swanson JM, Volkow ND (2002) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of stimulants: implications for the design of new treatments for ADHD. Behav Brain Res 130:73–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tannock R, Schachar RJ, Carr RP, Chajczyk D, Logan GD (1989) Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 17:473–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Trommer BL, Hoeppner JB, Zecker SG (1991) The Go-No Go test in attention deficit disorder is sensitive to methylphenidate. J Child Neurol 6[Suppl]:S128–S131Google Scholar
  52. Volkow ND, Wang G, Fowler JS, Logan J, Gerasimov M, Maynard L, Ding Y, Gatley SJ, Gifford A, Franceschi D (2001) Therapeutic doses of oral methylphenidate significantly increase extracellular dopamine in the human brain. J Neurosci 21:1–5Google Scholar
  53. Ward MF, Wender PH, Reimherr FW (1993) The Wender Utah rating scale: an aid in the retrospective diagnosis of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 150:885–890PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wade TR, de Wit H, Richards JB (2000) Effects of dopaminergic drugs on delayed reward as a measure of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology 150:90–101Google Scholar
  55. Wender PH, Reimherr FW, Wood D, Ward M (1985) A controlled study of methylphenidate in the treatment of attention deficit disorder, residual type, in adults. Am J Psychiatry 142:547–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilkison PC, Kircher JC, McMahon WM, Sloane HN (1995) Effects of methylphenidate on reward strength in boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34:897–901PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Zachary RA, Crumptom E, Spiegel DE (1985) Estimating WAIS-R IQ from the Shipley institute of living scale. J Clin Psychol 41:532–540Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia J. Pietras
    • 1
    • 2
  • Don R. Cherek
    • 1
  • Scott D. Lane
    • 1
  • Oleg V. Tcheremissine
    • 1
  • Joel L. Steinberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Human Psychopharmacology LaboratoryUniversity of Texas-Houston Health Science CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooUSA

Personalised recommendations