Global 5-HT depletion attenuates the ability of amphetamine to decrease impulsive choice on a delay-discounting task in rats
Psychomotor stimulant drugs such as methylphenidate and amphetamine decrease impulsive behaviour in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder patients by unknown mechanisms. Although most behavioural effects of amphetamine are attributed to the dopaminergic system, some recent evidence suggests a role for serotonin in this paradoxical "calming" effect.
To investigate whether forebrain serotonin depletion affects the action of amphetamine in the rat on a delayed reward task where impulsive choice is measured as the selection of a smaller immediate over a larger delayed reward.
Following behavioural training, rats received i.c.v. infusions of either vehicle (n=10) or the serotonergic neurotoxin 5,7-DHT (n=10). Post-operatively, animals received i.p. d-amphetamine (0.3,1.0,1.5, and 2.3 mg/kg/ml), and d-amphetamine co-administered with the dopamine antagonist cis-z-flupenthixol.
5,7-DHT (i.c.v.) itself did not affect choice behaviour, despite depleting forebrain serotonin levels by over 85%. Amphetamine increased choice for the large reward, i.e. decreased impulsivity. This effect was attenuated by 5-HT depletion, particularly in animals showing a high level of impulsive choice. Co-administration of cis-z-flupenthixol (0.125 mg/kg) with d-amphetamine abolished the effect of amphetamine in the lesioned group, whereas this was only partially attenuated in the vehicle control group.
These data suggest that the ability of amphetamine to decrease impulsivity is not solely due to its effects on dopaminergic systems, but may also depend on serotonergic neurotransmission.
KeywordsAmphetamine Serotonin Delay discounting ADHD Impulsivity
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme grant and completed within the MRC Centre for Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience. CAW was supported by an MRC Studentship.
- Barkley RA (1989) The problem of stimulus control and rule-governed behaviour in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. In: Bloomingdale LM, Swanson J (eds) Attention deficit disorder: current concepts and emerging trends in attentional and behavioral disorders of childhood. Pergamon, Elmsford, pp 203–232Google Scholar
- Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental designs, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Krause K-H, Dresel SH, Krause J, Kung HF, Tatsch K (2000) Increased striatal dopamine transporter in adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of methylphenidate as measured by single photon emission computed tomography. Neurosci Lett 285:107–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuczenski R, Segal DS (1995) Hippocampus norepinephrine, caudate dopamine and serotonin, and behavioral responses to the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine. J Neurosci 15:1306–1317Google Scholar
- Logue AW (1988) Research on self-control—an integrating framework. Behav Brain Sci 13:419–419Google Scholar
- Mackintosh NJ, Dickinson A (1979) Instrumental (type II) conditioning. In: Dickinson A, Boakes RA (eds) Mechanisms of learning and motivation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 143–167Google Scholar
- Mazur J (1987) An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: Commons ML, Mazur JE, Nevin JA, Rachlin H (eds) Quantitative analyses of behaviour: the effect of delay and intervening events on reinforcement value. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 55–73Google Scholar
- Robbins TW, Evenden JL (1985) Rate-independent approaches to the analysis of the behavioural effects of drugs. In: Lowe CF, Blackman DE, Richelle M (eds) Behaviour analysis and contemporary psychology. Erlbaum, London, pp 217–256Google Scholar
- Rogers RD, Everitt BJ, Baldacchino A, Blackshaw AJ, Swainson R, Wynne K, Baker NB, Hunter J, Carthy T, Booker E, London M, Deakin JFW, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW (1999) Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunteers: evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 20:322–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wenger GR, Dews PB (1976) The effects of phencyclidine, ketamine, D-amphetamine and pentobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior in the mouse. J Pharmacology Exp Ther 196:616–624Google Scholar
- Winstanley CA, Robbins TW (2002) Fractionating impulsivity: effects of global 5-HT depletion on different measures of impulsivity (abstract 682.16). Society for Neuroscience ProgramGoogle Scholar