A collaborative model for research on decisional capacity and informed consent in older patients with schizophrenia: Bioethics unit of a geriatric psychiatry intervention research center
- 232 Downloads
The numbers of older persons with psychiatric disorders are expected to rise rapidly in coming decades, yet most studies of the safety and efficacy of treatments for such disorders have focused on younger adults. A substantial expansion in research involving older patients is needed to meet the treatment needs of this fast growing group. A critical issue in intervention research is ensuring a patient's decision-making capacity. Considerable heterogeneity exists in this regard even within diagnostic groups. Cognitive changes as well as increased complexity of medication regimens in elderly patients may make it particularly difficult for some older persons to fully understand, appreciate, and/or reason about the risks and benefits of participating in any particular study.
Empirical research into assessing and possibly improving decisional capacity is warranted in older people with severe mental illness. Such research may be accomplished through collaborations among specialists from various related disciplines and, importantly, with active involvement of community partners.
We present one model of this type of collaboration, the Bioethics Unit of an Intervention Research Center, comprising a multi-disciplinary team along with a Community Advisory Board.
Preliminary studies in our Center suggest that older individuals with psychotic disorders vary considerably in their decisional capacity, and many subjects appear to be fully capable for consenting to research projects. Furthermore, the patients' level of understanding of the consent material can be improved significantly through repetition and clarification of key elements in the consent form.
The decisional capacity for a given research protocol is not necessarily an unmodifiable trait, but can be enhanced with improvements in consenting procedures, even in older persons with psychotic disorders.
KeywordsBioethics Informed consent Schizophrenia Aging Competency
This work was supported, in part, by NIMH grants MH49671, MH43693, MH59101, by the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression, and by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
- Beck JC (1988) Determining competency to assent to neuroleptic drug treatment. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 39:1106–1108Google Scholar
- Beck JC, Staffin RD (1986) Patients' competency to give informed consent to medication. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 37:400–402Google Scholar
- Bjerrum L, Sogaard J, Hallas J, Kragstrup J (1998) Polypharmacy: correlations with sex, age and drug regimen: a prescription database study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 54:197–202Google Scholar
- Christensen K, Haroun A, Schneiderman LJ, Jeste DV (1995) Decision-making capacity for informed consent in the older population. Bull Am Acad Psychiatr Law 23:353–365Google Scholar
- Fins JJ, Miller FG (2000) Enrolling decisionally incapacitated subjects in neuropsychiatric research. CNS Spect 5:32–42Google Scholar
- Grossman L, Summers F (1980) A study of the capacity of schizophrenic patients to give informed consent. Hosp Commun Psychiatry 31:205–206Google Scholar
- Herz DA, Looman JE, Lewis SK (1992) Informed consent: Is it a myth? Neurosurgery 30:453–458Google Scholar
- Hutson MM, Blaha JD (1991) Patients' recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation. J Bone Joint Surg 73-A:160–162Google Scholar
- Irwin M, Lovitz A, Marder SR, Mintz J, Winslade WJ, Van Putten T, Mills MJ (1984) Psychotic patients' understanding of informed consent. Am J Psychiatry 142:1351–1354Google Scholar
- Jeste DV (2000) Tardive dyskinesia in older patients. J Clin Psychiatry 61:27–32Google Scholar
- Karlawish JH, Lantos J (1997) Community equipoise and the architecture of clinical research. Cambridge Q Healthcare Ethics 6:385–396Google Scholar
- Kramarow E, Lentzner H, Rooks R, Weeks J, Saydah S (1999) Health and aging chartbook, health, United States. National Center for Health Studies, Hyattsville, Md.Google Scholar
- Michels R (1999) Are research ethics bad for our mental health? N Engl J Med 340:1427–1430Google Scholar
- National Bioethics Advisory Commission (1998) Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity. Report of the Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Rockville, Md.Google Scholar
- National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978) The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of researchGoogle Scholar
- Rothman DJ (1987) Ethics and human experimentation: Henry Beecher revisited. N Engl J Med 317:1195–1199Google Scholar
- Saks ER, Behnke SH (1999) Competency to decide on treatment and research: MacArthur and beyond. J Contemp Legal Issues 10:103–129Google Scholar