Locomotor and discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine in dopamine D5 receptor knockout mice
- 151 Downloads
Dopamine D1-like antagonists block several effects of cocaine, including its locomotor-stimulant and discriminative-stimulus effects. Because these compounds generally lack selectivity among the dopamine D1 and D5 receptors, the specific roles of the subtypes have not been determined.
Dopamine D5 receptor knockout (DA D5R KO), heterozygous (HET) and wild-type (WT) mice were used to study the role of D5 dopamine receptors in the effects of cocaine. In addition, effects of the D1-like antagonist, SCH 39166 were also studied to further clarify the roles of D1 and D5 dopamine receptors in the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine.
DA D5R KO, HET and WT mice were treated with cocaine (3–30 mg/kg) or vehicle and their horizontal locomotor activity was assessed. The mice were also trained to discriminate IP injections of saline from cocaine (10 mg/kg) using a two-lever food-reinforcement (FR10) procedure. Doses of cocaine (1.0–10 mg/kg) were administered 5 min before 15-min test-sessions.
Cocaine dose-dependently stimulated activity in each genotype, with the highest level of activity induced in the DA D5R WT mice. Both DA D5R KO and HET mice showed reduced levels of horizontal activity compared to WT mice. All three genotypes acquired the discrimination of 10 mg/kg cocaine; doses of 1.0–10.0 mg/kg produced dose-related increases in the number of cocaine-appropriate responses. SCH 39166, at inactive to fully active doses (0.01–0.1 mg/kg) produced predominately saline-appropriate responding. SCH 39166 produced a dose-dependent rightward shift in the cocaine dose-effect curve in all genotypes, with similar apparent affinities.
The present data suggest an involvement of DA D5R in the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine. In addition, the data indicate that there is little involvement of the DA D5R in the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine. In addition, the antagonism data suggest a role of the D1 receptor in the behavioral effects of cocaine.
KeywordsDopamine D5 Knockout Cocaine SCH 39166 Locomotor activity Drug discrimination
The authors would like to thank Dawn French, Ben Nickle, and Patty Ballerstadt for technical and administrative support. The research was supported by funding by the National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program (J.L.K.) and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (D.R.S.).
- Bergson C, Mrzljak L, Smiley JF, Pappy M, Levenson R, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995) Regional, cellular, and subcellular variations in the distribution of D1 and D5 dopamine receptors in primate brain. J Neurosci 15:7821–7836Google Scholar
- Chausmer AL, Elmer GI, Rubinstein M, Low MJ, Grandy DK, Katz JL (2002) Cocaine-induced locomotor activity and cocaine discrimination in dopamine D2 receptor mutant mice. Psychopharmacology 163:54–61Google Scholar
- Dews PB (1953) The measurement of the influence of drugs on voluntary activity in mice. Br J Pharmacol 8:46–48Google Scholar
- Finney DJ (1964) Statistical method in biological assay, 2nd edn. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Huang Q, Zhou D, Chase K, Gusella JF, Aronin N, DiFiglia M (1992) Immunohistochemical localization of the D1 dopamine receptor in rat brain reveals its axonal transport, pre- and postsynaptic localization, and prevalence in the basal ganglia, limbic system, and thalamic reticular nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11988–11992PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th edn. State University Press, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
- Tallarida RJ, Murray RB (1987) Manual of pharmacologic calculations with computer programs, 2nd edn. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Tiberi M, Jarvie KR, Silvia C, Falardeau P, Gingrich JA, Godinot N, Bertrand L, Yang-Feng TL, Fremeau RT Jr, Caron MG (1991) Cloning, molecular characterization, and chromosomal assignment of a gene encoding a second D1 dopamine receptor subtype: differential expression pattern in rat brain compared with the D1A receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:7491–7495PubMedGoogle Scholar