Ethical issues in the use of animals in biomedical and psychopharmocological research
The ethical debate concerning the use of animals in biomedical and pharmacological research continues to be replete with misunderstandings about whether animals have moral standing.
This article briefly reviews the central ethical positions and their relationship to the basic parameters of research regulation from an international perspective. The issues associated with the validation of animal models will then be discussed. Finally, suggestions for empirical ethics research will be presented.
Recent literature reviews were accessed and analyzed.
This review summarizes the pertinent ethical and research literature.
In summary, regardless of the ethical perspective one favors, there is strong agreement that animals matter morally and that at a minimum their welfare must be considered. This position is reflected in the structure of national regulatory schemes that emphasize the three Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement). Researchers should more actively participate in the discussion by becoming more knowledgeable about the details of the ethical issues. Research with animal models has been problematic in that it has often focused on attempting to produce global models of psychiatric disorders, which suffer from inherent validity problems. Researchers must also become more sophisticated about issues of model validation and the nature of the animals they use.
KeywordsEthics Psychopharmacology Animal research Animal models Validity Moral standing
- Babkin BP (1938) Experimental neuroses in animals and their treatment with bromides. Edinb Med J 45:605–619Google Scholar
- Beauchamp T (1997) Opposing views on animal experimentation: do animals have rights? Ethics Behav 7:113–21Google Scholar
- Brody B (1998) The ethics of biomedical research: an international perspective. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cohen C (1986) The case for the use of animals in biomedical research. N Engl J Med 315:865–70Google Scholar
- De Grazia D (1991) The moral status of animals and their use in research: a philosophical review. Kennedy Inst Ethics J1:48–70Google Scholar
- Epling W (1989) Rats. Behav Anal 12:251–253Google Scholar
- Frey R (2002) Ethics, animals, and scientific inquiry. In: Gluck JP, DiPasquale T, Orlans FB (eds) Applied ethics in animal research: philosophy, regulation, and laboratory applications. Purdue, West Lafayette, pp 13–24Google Scholar
- Geyer MA, Markou A (1995) Animal models of psychiatric disorders. In Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ (eds) Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. Raven, New York, pp 787–798Google Scholar
- Gluck JP (1997) Learning to see the animals again. In: Lafollette H (ed) Ethics in practice. Blackwell, London, pp 160–167Google Scholar
- Gluck JP, DiPasquale T (2002) Introduction and overview. In: Gluck JP DiPasquale T, Orlans FB (eds) Applied ethics in animal research: philosophy, regulation, and laboratory applications. Purdue, West Lafayette, pp 1–11Google Scholar
- Griffin D (1981) The question of animal awareness. Rockefeller University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Griffin D (1984) Animal thinking. Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Griffin D (1992) Animal minds. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Hauser M (2000) Wild minds. Henry Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Masserman JH (1946) Principles of dynamic psychiatry. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Midgeley M (1984) Animals and why they matter. University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
- Morrison A (2001) A scientist's perspective on the ethics of using animals in behavioral research. In: Carroll M, Overmier JB (2001) Animal research and human health. American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Orlans FB (2002) Ethical themes of the national regulations governing animal experiments: an international perspective. In: Gluck JP, DiPasquale T, Orlans FB (eds) Applied ethics in animal research: philosophy, regulation, and laboratory applications. Purdue University, West LafayetteGoogle Scholar
- Overall KL (1994) Use of clomipramine to treat ritualistic motor behavior in dogs. J Am Vet Assoc 205:1733–1741Google Scholar
- Regan T (1983) The case for animal rights. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Rollin B (1989) The unheeded cry: animal consciousness, animal pain and science. Oxford University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Russell W, Burch R (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Sapontzis S (1987) Morals, reasons and animals. Temple University, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Shenger-Krestovnikova NR (1921) Contributions to the question of differentiation of visual stimuli and the limits of differentiation by the visual analyzer of the dog. Bull Lesgaft Inst Petrograd 3:1–43Google Scholar
- Singer P (1975) Animal liberation: a new ethics for the treatment of animals. New York Review, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Singer P (1990) Animal liberation: a new ethics for the treatment of animals, 2nd edn. New York Review, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Willner P (1995) Animal models of depression: validity and applications. In: Gessa G, Fratta W, Pani L, Serra G (eds) Depression and mania: from neurobiology to treatment. Raven, New York, pp 19–41Google Scholar