Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement
- 806 Downloads
Current conceptualizations of drug reinforcement assume that drug-taking behavior is a consequence of the contingent, temporal relationship between the behavior and drug reward. However, stimulant drugs also potentiate the rewarding effects of other reinforcers when administered noncontingently.
These studies were designed to determine whether noncontingent nicotine enhances the reinforcing properties of a nonpharmacological reinforcer and whether this direct effect facilitates operant behavior within the context of a nicotine self-administration procedure.
Rats self-administered nicotine or food, or received noncontingent nicotine, saline, or food either with or without a response-contingent, unconditioned reinforcing visual stimulus (VS).
Noncontingent nicotine, whether delivered as discrete injections based on a pattern of self-administered nicotine or as a continuous infusion, increased response rates maintained by the VS. There were no significant differences in responding by animals that received contingent compared with noncontingent nicotine when a VS was available. This increase was not observed in the absence of the VS or as a consequence of noncontingent food delivery. Operant behavior was equally attenuated and reinstated by the removal and subsequent replacement of contingent and noncontingent nicotine. Nicotine supported self-administration in the absence of response-contingent, nicotine-paired stimuli; however, response rates were drastically reduced compared with nicotine self-administration with the VS.
Nicotine influences operant behavior in two ways: by acting as a primary reinforcer when it is contingent upon behavior, and by directly potentiating the reinforcing properties of other stimuli through a nonassociative mechanism. Nicotine self-administration and smoking may be largely dependent upon this later action.
KeywordsNicotine Self-administration Contingency Reinforcement Extinction Acquisition
- Bien TH, Burge R (1990) Smoking and drinking: a review of the literature. Int J Addict 25:1429–1454Google Scholar
- Dews PB (1958) Studies on behavior: IV. stimulant actions of methamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 122:137–147Google Scholar
- Hill RT (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism of psychomotor stimulation. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamines and related compounds: proceeding of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological research, Milan, Italy. Raven Press, New York, pp 781–795Google Scholar
- Meisch RA, Lemaire GA (1993) Drug self-administration. In: van Haaren F (ed) Methods in behavioral pharmacology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 257–300Google Scholar
- Potthoff AD, Ellison G, Nelson L (1983) Ethanol intake increases during continuous administration of amphetamine and nicotine, but not several other drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:489–493Google Scholar
- Robbins TW (1976) Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Nature 264:57–59Google Scholar
- Robbins TW, Koob GF (1978) Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8:219–222Google Scholar
- Stein L (1964) Amphetamine and neural reward mechanisms. In: Steinberg H, deReuck AVS, Knight J (eds) Animal behavior and drug action. Churchill, London, pp 91–118Google Scholar
- Stewart J (1960) Reinforcing effects of light as a function of intensity and reinforcement schedule. J Comp Physiol Psychol 53:187–193Google Scholar
- Stewart J, Hurwitz HMB (1958) Studies in light-reinforced behaviour III: the effects of continuous, zero and fixed-ratio reinforcement. Q J Exp Psychol 10:56–61Google Scholar
- USDHHS (1988) Nicotine addiction: a report of the surgeon general. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office on Smoking and Health, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar