Psychopharmacology

, Volume 169, Issue 1, pp 68–76

Operant responding for a visual reinforcer in rats is enhanced by noncontingent nicotine: implications for nicotine self-administration and reinforcement

  • Eric C. Donny
  • Nadia Chaudhri
  • Anthony R. Caggiula
  • F. Fay Evans-Martin
  • Sheri Booth
  • Maysa A. Gharib
  • Laure A. Clements
  • Alan F. Sved
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Current conceptualizations of drug reinforcement assume that drug-taking behavior is a consequence of the contingent, temporal relationship between the behavior and drug reward. However, stimulant drugs also potentiate the rewarding effects of other reinforcers when administered noncontingently.

Objectives

These studies were designed to determine whether noncontingent nicotine enhances the reinforcing properties of a nonpharmacological reinforcer and whether this direct effect facilitates operant behavior within the context of a nicotine self-administration procedure.

Methods

Rats self-administered nicotine or food, or received noncontingent nicotine, saline, or food either with or without a response-contingent, unconditioned reinforcing visual stimulus (VS).

Results

Noncontingent nicotine, whether delivered as discrete injections based on a pattern of self-administered nicotine or as a continuous infusion, increased response rates maintained by the VS. There were no significant differences in responding by animals that received contingent compared with noncontingent nicotine when a VS was available. This increase was not observed in the absence of the VS or as a consequence of noncontingent food delivery. Operant behavior was equally attenuated and reinstated by the removal and subsequent replacement of contingent and noncontingent nicotine. Nicotine supported self-administration in the absence of response-contingent, nicotine-paired stimuli; however, response rates were drastically reduced compared with nicotine self-administration with the VS.

Conclusions

Nicotine influences operant behavior in two ways: by acting as a primary reinforcer when it is contingent upon behavior, and by directly potentiating the reinforcing properties of other stimuli through a nonassociative mechanism. Nicotine self-administration and smoking may be largely dependent upon this later action.

Keywords

Nicotine Self-administration Contingency Reinforcement Extinction Acquisition 

References

  1. Balleine BW, Dickinson A (1998) Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology 37:407–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauco P, Wise RA (1994) Potentiation of lateral hypothalamic and midline mesencephalic brain stimulation reinforcement by nicotine: examination of repeated treatment. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 271:294–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechtholt, AJ, Mark, GP (2002) Enhancement of cocaine-seeking behavior by repeated nicotine exposure in rats. Psychopharmacology 162:178–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beninger RJ, Hanson DR, Phillips AG (1981) The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of cocaine, (+)-amphetamine and pipradrol. Br J Pharmacol 74:149–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bien TH, Burge R (1990) Smoking and drinking: a review of the literature. Int J Addict 25:1429–1454Google Scholar
  6. Byrd LD (1979) The behavioral effects of cocaine: rate dependency or rate constancy. Eur J Pharmacol 56:355–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caggiula AR, Donny EC, White AR, Chaudhri N, Booth S, Gharib MA, Hoffman A, Perkins KA, Sved AF (2001) Cue dependency of nicotine self-administration and smoking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 70:515–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Caggiula AR, Donny EC, White AR, Chaudhri N, Booth S, Gharib MA, Hoffman A, Perkins KA, Sved AF (2002) Environmental stimuli promote the acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 163:230–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark A, Lindgren S, Brooks SP, Watson WP, Little HJ (2001) Chronic infusion of nicotine can increase operant self-administration of alcohol. Neuropharmacology 41:108–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Corrigall WA, Coen KM (1989) Nicotine maintains robust self-administration in rats on a limited-access schedule. Psychopharmacology 99:473–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Corrigall WA, Franklin KB, Coen KM, Clarke PB (1992) The mesolimbic dopaminergic system is implicated in the reinforcing effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology 107:285–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dews PB (1958) Studies on behavior: IV. stimulant actions of methamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 122:137–147Google Scholar
  13. Donny EC, Caggiula AR, Mielke MM, Jacobs KS, Rose C, Sved AF (1998) Acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats: the effects of dose, feeding schedule, and drug contingency. Psychopharmacology 136:83–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Donny EC, Caggiula AR, Mielke MM, Booth S, Gharib MA, Hoffman A, Maldovan V, Shupenko C, McCallum SE (1999) Nicotine self-administration in rats on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 147:135–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Donny EC, Caggiula AR, Rowell PP, Gharib MA, Maldovan V, Booth S, Mielke MM, Hoffman A, McCallum S (2000) Nicotine self-administration in rats: estrous cycle effects, sex differences and nicotinic receptor binding. Psychopharmacology 151:392–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Everitt BJ, Dickinson A, Robbins TW (2001) The neuropsychological basis of addictive behaviour. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 36:129–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrett BE, Griffiths RR (2001) Intravenous nicotine and caffeine: subjective and physiological effects in cocaine abusers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 296:486–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldberg SR, Spealman RD, Goldberg DM (1981) Persistent behavior at high rates maintained by intravenous self-administration of nicotine. Science 214:573–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hendry JS, Rosecrans JA (1982) Effects of nicotine on conditioned and unconditioned behaviors in experimental animals. Pharmacol Ther 17:431–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Henningfield JE, Goldberg SR (1983a) Control of behavior by intravenous nicotine injections in human subjects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:1021–1026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Henningfield JE, Goldberg SR (1983b) Nicotine as a reinforcer in human subjects and laboratory animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:989–992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill RT (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism of psychomotor stimulation. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamines and related compounds: proceeding of the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological research, Milan, Italy. Raven Press, New York, pp 781–795Google Scholar
  23. Lowe G, Williams DI (1969) Some effects of a hallucinogenic compound (cyprenorphine hydrochloride; M 285) on the light reinforced behaviour of rats. Nature 224:1226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mansvelder HD, Keath JR, McGehee DS (2002) Synaptic mechanisms underlie nicotine-induced excitability of brain reward areas. Neuron 33:905–919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Markou A, Arroyo M, Everitt BJ (1999) Effects of contingent and non-contingent cocaine on drug-seeking behavior measured using a second-order schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 20:542–555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Meisch RA, Lemaire GA (1993) Drug self-administration. In: van Haaren F (ed) Methods in behavioral pharmacology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 257–300Google Scholar
  27. Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1990) Role of reward and enhancement of conditioned reward in persistence of responding for cocaine. Behav Pharmacol 1:269–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Rimondini R, Lena C, Marubio LM, Pich EM, Fuxe K, Changeux JP (1998) Acetylcholine receptors containing the beta2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature 391:173–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pickworth WB, Fant RV, Nelson RA, Rohrer MS, Henningfield JE (1999) Pharmacodynamic effects of new de-nicotinized cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 1:357–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Popke EJ, Mayorga AJ, Fogle CM, Paule MG (2000) Effects of acute nicotine on several operant behaviors in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:247–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Potthoff AD, Ellison G, Nelson L (1983) Ethanol intake increases during continuous administration of amphetamine and nicotine, but not several other drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:489–493Google Scholar
  32. Robbins TW (1976) Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Nature 264:57–59Google Scholar
  33. Robbins TW (1977) Reward enhancement by psychomotor stimulant drugs [proceedings]. Neuropharmacology 16:529–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Robbins TW, Koob GF (1978) Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8:219–222Google Scholar
  35. Robbins TW, Watson BA, Gaskin M, Ennis C (1983) Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 80:113–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose JE, Corrigall WA (1997) Nicotine self-administration in animals and humans: similarities and differences. Psychopharmacology 130:28–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rose JE, Levin ED (1991) Inter-relationships between conditioned and primary reinforcement in the maintenance of cigarette smoking. Br J Addict 86:605–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose JE, Behm FM, Westman EC, Johnson M (2000) Dissociating nicotine and nonnicotine components of cigarette smoking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 67:71–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Shoaib M, Schindler CW, Goldberg SR (1997) Nicotine self-administration in rats: strain and nicotine pre-exposure effects on acquisition. Psychopharmacology 129:35–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stein L (1964) Amphetamine and neural reward mechanisms. In: Steinberg H, deReuck AVS, Knight J (eds) Animal behavior and drug action. Churchill, London, pp 91–118Google Scholar
  41. Stewart J (1960) Reinforcing effects of light as a function of intensity and reinforcement schedule. J Comp Physiol Psychol 53:187–193Google Scholar
  42. Stewart J, Hurwitz HMB (1958) Studies in light-reinforced behaviour III: the effects of continuous, zero and fixed-ratio reinforcement. Q J Exp Psychol 10:56–61Google Scholar
  43. Taylor JR, Horger BA (1999) Enhanced responding for conditioned reward produced by intra-accumbens amphetamine is potentiated after cocaine sensitization. Psychopharmacology 142:31–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. USDHHS (1988) Nicotine addiction: a report of the surgeon general. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office on Smoking and Health, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
  45. Westman EC, Behm FM, Rose JE (1996) Dissociating the nicotine and airway sensory effects of smoking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:309–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Whitelaw RB, Markou A, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1996) Excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral amygdala impair the acquisition of cocaine-seeking behaviour under a second-order schedule of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 127:213–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric C. Donny
    • 1
  • Nadia Chaudhri
    • 2
  • Anthony R. Caggiula
    • 3
  • F. Fay Evans-Martin
    • 3
  • Sheri Booth
    • 3
  • Maysa A. Gharib
    • 3
  • Laure A. Clements
    • 3
  • Alan F. Sved
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Behavioral Pharmacology Research UnitJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations