Advertisement

Differentiation and regularity of semi-discrete optimal transport with respect to the parameters of the discrete measure

  • Frédéric de Gournay
  • Jonas Kahn
  • Léo Lebrat
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This paper aims at determining under which conditions the semi-discrete optimal transport is twice differentiable with respect to the parameters of the discrete measure and exhibits numerical applications. The discussion focuses on minimal conditions on the background measure to ensure differentiability. We provide numerical illustrations in stippling and blue noise problems.

Mathematics Subject Classification

49M15 65D18 46N10 

References

  1. 1.
    Asami, Y.: A note on the derivation of the first and second derivative of objective functions in geographical optimization problems. J. Fac. Eng. Univ. Tokyo (B) 41(1), 1–13 (1991)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aurenhammer, F.: Power diagrams: properties, algorithms and applications. SIAM J. Comput. 16(1), 78–96 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aurenhammer, F., Hoffmann, F., Aronov, B.: Minkowski-type theorems and least-squares clustering. Algorithmica 20(1), 61–76 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertsekas, D.P.: Nonlinear Programming. Athena Scientific, Belmont (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brezis, H., Ciarlet, P.G., Lions, J.L.: Analyse fonctionnelle: théorie et applications, vol. 91. Dunod, Paris (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CGAL, Computational Geometry Algorithms Library. http://www.cgal.org. Accessed 24 Oct 2018
  7. 7.
    de Goes, F.F.: Geometric discretization through primal-dual meshes. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Goes, F., Breeden, K., Ostromoukhov, V., Desbrun, M.: Blue noise through optimal transport. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 31(6), 171 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Du, Q., Emelianenko, M., Ju, L.: Convergence of the Lloyd algorithm for computing centroidal Voronoi tessellations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44(1), 102–119 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Du, Q., Faber, V., Gunzburger, M.: Centroidal Voronoi tessellations: applications and algorithms. SIAM Rev. 41(4), 637–676 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Du, Q., Gunzburger, M.: Grid generation and optimization based on centroidal Voronoi tessellations. Appl. Math. Comput. 133(2), 591–607 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flamary, R., Cuturi, M., Courty, N., Rakotomamonjy, A.: Wasserstein discriminant analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.08063 (2016)
  13. 13.
    Graf, S., Luschgy, H.: Foundations of Quantization for Probability Distributions. Springer, Berlin (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gruber, P.M.: Optimum quantization and its applications. Adv. Math. 186(2), 456–497 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henrot, A., Pierre, M.: Variation et optimisation de formes: une analyse géométrique, vol. 48. Springer, Berlin (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iri, M., Murota, K., Ohya, T.: A fast Voronoi-diagram algorithm with applications to geographical optimization problems. In: Thoft-Christensen, P. (ed.) System Modelling and Optimization, pp. 273–288. Springer, Berlin (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jordan, R., Kinderlehrer, D., Otto, F.: The variational formulation of the Fokker–Planck equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 29(1), 1–17 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kantorovich, L.V.: On a problem of Monge. C. R. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS (NS) 3, 225–226 (1948)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kitagawa, J., Mérigot, Q., Thibert, B.: Convergence of a Newton algorithm for semi-discrete optimal transport. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) (to appear)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lévy, B.: A numerical algorithm for l2 semi-discrete optimal transport in 3D. ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 49(6), 1693–1715 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lévy, B., Liu, Y.: \(L_p\) centroidal Voronoi tessellation and its applications. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 29, 1–11 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, Y., Wang, W., Lévy, B., Sun, F., Yan, D.M., Lu, L., Yang, C.: On centroidal Voronoi tessellation, energy smoothness and fast computation. ACM Trans. Graph. (ToG) 28(4), 101 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lloyd, S.: Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. Inf. theory 28(2), 129–137 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mérigot, Q.: A comparison of two dual methods for discrete optimal transport. In: Geometric Science of Information, pp. 389–396. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mérigot, Q., Meyron, J., Thibert, B.: An algorithm for optimal transport between a simplex soup and a point cloud. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 11(2), 1363–1389 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Monge, G.: Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et des remblais. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris (1781)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pages, G., Wilbertz, B.: Optimal Delaunay and Voronoi quantization schemes for pricing American style options. In: Carmona, R., Del Moral, P., Hu, P., Oudjane, N. (eds.) Numerical Methods in Finance, pp. 171–213. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C., Guibas, L.J.: The Earth mover’s distance as a metric for image retrieval. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 40(2), 99–121 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saad, Y.: Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. SIAM, Philadelphia (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Solomon, J., Rustamov, R., Leonidas, G., Butscher, A.: Wasserstein propagation for semi-supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), pp. 306–314 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Villani, C.: Topics in Optimal Transportation, vol. 58. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang, W., Slepčev, D., Basu, S., Ozolek, J.A., Rohde, G.K.: A linear optimal transportation framework for quantifying and visualizing variations in sets of images. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 101(2), 254–269 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frédéric de Gournay
    • 1
  • Jonas Kahn
    • 2
  • Léo Lebrat
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse (UMR 5219), CNRS, INSAUniversité de ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse (UMR 5219), CNRS, UPS, IMTUniversité de ToulouseToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations