Numerische Mathematik

, Volume 122, Issue 4, pp 771–793 | Cite as

A mixed finite element method for thin film epitaxy

Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

We present a mixed finite element method for the thin film epitaxy problem. Comparing to the primal formulation which requires \(C^2\) elements in the discretization, the mixed formulation only needs to use \(C^1\) elements, by introducing proper dual variables. The dual variable in our method is defined naturally from the nonlinear term in the equation, and its accurate approximation will be essential for understanding the long-time effect of the nonlinear term. For time-discretization, we use a backward-Euler semi-implicit scheme, which involves a convex–concave decomposition of the nonlinear term. The scheme is proved to be unconditionally stable and its convergence rate is analyzed.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

35K55 35Q99 65M12 65M60 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Chen was supported by the 111 project, Key Project National Science Foundation of China (91130004) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (11171077). He also thanks Jianguo Liu in Duke University and Xiaoming Wang in Florida State University for the fruitful discussions. Wang thanks the Key Laboratory of Mathematics for Nonlinear Sciences (EYH1140070), Fudan University, for the support during her visit. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions which greatly improved the quality of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold, D.N., Falk, R.S.: A uniformly accurate finite element method for the Reissner–Mindlin plate. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 26, 1276–1290 (1989)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bathe, K.J., Dvorkin, E.N.: A four-node plate bending element based on Mindlin–Reissner plate theory and a mixed interpolation. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 21, 367–383 (1985)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bathe, K.J., Brezzi, F.: On the convergence of a four-node plate bending element based on Mindlin–Reissner plate theory and a mixed interpolation. In: Whiteman, J.R. (ed.) MAFELAP V, pp. 491–503. Academic Press, London (1985)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bathe, K.J., Brezzi, F.: A simplified analysis of two plate-bending elements-the MITC4 and MITC9 elements. In: Pande, G.N., Middleton, J. (eds.) MUNETA 87. Numerical Techniques for Engineering Analysis and Design, vol. 1 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berkovitz, L.D.: Convexity and optimization in \({\mathbb{R}}^n\). Wiley, New York (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blomker, D., Gugg, C.: On the existence of solutions for amorphous molecular beam epitaxy. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 3, 61–73 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brezzi, F., Fortin, M.: Numerical approximation of Mindlin-Reissner plates. Math. Comp. 47, 151–158 (1986)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brezzi, F., Bathe, K.J., Fortin, M.: Mixed interpolated elements for Reissner–Mindlin plates. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 28, 1787–1801 (1989)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caflisch, R.E., Gyure, M.F., Merriman, B., Osher, S., Ratsch, C., Vvedensky, D.D.: Island dynamics and the level set method for epitaxial growth. Appl. Math. Lett. 12, 13–22 (1999)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, W., Conde, S., Wang, C., Wang, X., Wise, S.M.: A linear energy stable scheme for a thin film model without slope selection. J. Sci. Comput. 26, 1–17 (2011)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cho, A.: Film deposition by molecular beam techniques. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 8, S31–S38 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho, A., Arthur, J.: Molecular beam epitaxy. Prog. Solid State Chem. 10, 157–192 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clarke, S., Vvedensky, D.D.: Origin of reflection high-energy electron-diffraction intensity oscillations during molecular-beam epitaxy: a computational modeling approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2235–2238 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Copetti, M.I.M., Elliot, C.M.: Numerical Analysis of the Cahn–Hilliard equation with a logarithmic free energy. Numer. Math. 63, 39–65 (1992)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Du, Q., Nicolaides, R.A.: Numerical analysis of a continuum model of phase transition. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 28, 1310–1322 (1991)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duran, R., Liberman, E.: On mixed finite element methods for the Reissner–Mindlin plate model. Math. Comp. 58, 561–573 (1992)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elliot, C.M., French, D.A.: Numerical studies of the Cahn–Hilliard equation for phase separation. IMA J. Appl. Math. 38, 97–128 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elliot, C.M., French, D.A.: A nonconforming finite-element method for the two-dimensional Cahn–Hilliard equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 26, 884–903 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elliot, C.M., French, D.A.: A second order splitting method for the Cahn–Hilliard equation. Numer. Math. 54, 575–590 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eyre, D.J.: Unconditionally gradient stable time marching the Cahn–Hilliard equation. In: Bullard, J.W., Kalia, R., Stoneham, M., , Chen, L.Q. (eds.) Computational and Mathematical Models of Microstructural Evolution, p. 1712. Materials Research Society, Warrendale (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feng, X., Prohl, A.: Error analysis of a mixed finite element method for the Cahn–Hilliard equation. Numer. Math. 99, 47–84 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gyure, M.F., Ratsch, C., Merriman, B., Caflisch, R.E., Osher, S.: Level-set methods for the simulation of epitaxial phenomena. Phys. Rev. E 58, R6927–R6930 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Han, W., Cheng, X., Huang, H.: Some mixed finite element methods for biharmonic equation. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 126, 91–109 (1999)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoppe, R.H., Nash, E.M.: A combined spectral element/finite element approach to the numerical solution of a nonlinear evolution equation describing amorphous surface growth of thin films. J. Numer. Math. 10, 127–136 (2002)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Johnson, C., Pitkäranta, J.: Analysis of some mixed finite element methods related to reduced integration. Math. Comp. 38, 375–400 (1982)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kang, H.C., Weinberg, W.H.: Dynamic Monte Carlo with a proper energy barrier: surface diffusion and two-dimensional domain ordering. J. Chem. Phys. 90, 2824–2830 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    King, B.B., Stein, O., Winkler, M.: A fourth-order parabolic equation modeling epitaxial thin film growth. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 286, 459–490 (2003)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kohn, R.V., Yan, X.: Upper bounds on the coarsening rate for an epitaxial growth model. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 56, 1549–1564 (2003)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krug, J.: Origins of scale invariance in growth processes. Adv. Phys. 46, 139–282 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li, B.: High-order surface relaxation versus the Ehrlich–Schwoebel effect. Nonlinearity 19, 2581–2603 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li, B.: Variational properties of unbounded order parameters. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 38, 16–36 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li, B., Liu, J.: Thin film epitaxy with or without slope selection. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 14, 713–743 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li, B., Liu, J.: Epitaxial growth without slope selection: energetics, coarsening, and dynamic scaling. J. Nonlinear Sci. 14, 429–451 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lu, X., Lin, P., Liu, J.: Analysis of a sequential regularization method for the unsteady Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Comp. 77, 1467–1494 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Malkus, D.S., Hughes, T.J.R.: Mixed finite element methods-reduced and selective integration techniques: a unification of concepts. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 15, 63–81 (1978)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ortiz, M., Repetto, E., Si, H.: A continuum model of kinetic roughening and coarsening in thin films. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 47, 697–730 (1999)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rost, M.: Continuum models for surface growth. Int. Ser. Numer. Math. 149, 195–208 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schneider, M., Schuller, I.K., Rahman, A.: Epitaxial growth of silicon: a molecular-dynamics simulation. Phys. Rev. B 36, 1340–1343 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scholtz, R.: A mixed method for fourth-order problems using the linear finite elements. RAIRO Numer. Anal. 15, 85–90 (1978)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scott, L.R., Zhang, S.: Finite element interpolation of nonsmooth function satisfying boundary conditions. Math. Comp. 54, 483–493 (1990)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Siegert, M., Plischke, M.: Solid-on-solid models of molecular-beam epitaxy. Phys. Rev. E 50, 917–931 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Villain, J.: Continuum models of crystal growth from atomistic beams with and without desorption. J. Phys. I 1, 19–42 (1991)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang, C., Wang, X., Wise, S.: Unconditionally stable schemes for equations of thin film epitaxy. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 28, 405–423 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Xia, X., Chen, W., Liu, J.: Convergence analysis of implicit full discretization for the epitaxial growth model of thin films. Numer. Math. J. Chin. Univ. 34(1), 30–51 (2012). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Xu, C., Tang, T.: Stability analysis of large time-stepping methods for epitaxial growth models. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44, 1759–1779 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematical SciencesFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations