This paper reinvestigates a recently introduced notion of backscattering for the inverse obstacle problem in impedance tomography. Under mild restrictions on the topological properties of the obstacles, it is shown that the corresponding backscatter data are the boundary values of a function that is holomorphic in the exterior of the obstacle(s), which allows to reformulate the obstacle problem as an inverse source problem for the Laplace equation. For general obstacles, the convex backscattering support is then defined to be the smallest convex set that carries an admissible source, i.e., a source that yields the given (backscatter) data as the trace of the associated potential. The convex backscattering support can be computed numerically; numerical reconstructions are included to illustrate the viability of the method.
Hanke M., Kirsch A.: Samplingmethods. In: Scherzer, O. (eds) Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging, Springer, New York (2010)Google Scholar
Henrici P.: Applied and Computational Complex Analysis, vol. 1. Wiley, New York (1974)MATHGoogle Scholar
Hettlich F., Rundell W.: The determination of a discontinuity in a conductivity from a single boundary measurement. Inverse Probl. 14, 67–82 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Hyvönen N.: Complete electrode model of electrical impedance tomography: approximation properties and characterization of inclusions. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 64, 902–931 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Hyvönen N.: Application of a weaker formulation of the factorization method to the characterization of absorbing inclusions in optical tomography. Inverse Probl. 21, 1331–1343 (2005)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyvönen N.: Application of the factorization method to the characterization of weak inclusions in electrical impedance tomography. Adv. Appl. Math. 39, 197–221 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar