Advertisement

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology

, Volume 392, Issue 1, pp 29–36 | Cite as

Development of perceived pharmacological deficits of medical students and alumni supports claim for continuous and more application-oriented education

  • Wencke Johannsen
  • Bernhard Frings
  • Stefan Herzig
  • Jan MatthesEmail author
Original Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Medical students’ prescribing competencies are insufficient. So far, surveys focused on final-year students. Knowledge and confidence seem important, but their development during medical studies are unclear. This study investigated whether students perceived deficits in pharmacological knowledge change during medical studies. Alumni were included to look for changes occurring after graduation. Medical students at different stages of their studies were invited to fill in paper-and-pencil (6th-, 8th-, 9th- and 10th-term students) or online questionnaires (final-year students and alumni) regarding their self-assessed deficits in pharmacology. Questionnaires have been developed based on previous interviews with 10th-term students. We differentiated between declarative and application-oriented knowledge. In total, data from 816 participants could be analysed. Self-assessment regarding declarative knowledge changed during medical studies, being more sceptical in terms without pharmacology courses. Of note, self-assessment of application-oriented knowledge remained constantly low throughout, although our pharmacology courses use problem-based learning. Tenth-term students were most sceptical, perhaps influenced by an obligatory, formative, simulation-based, 1-week course, preparing students for their final practical year. Compared to students, alumni were significantly less sceptical regarding application-oriented knowledge. Students’ self-assessment of deficits in pharmacological knowledge changes throughout their studies, presumably in association with pharmacology courses. Overall, students are rather sceptical, especially with regard to application-oriented knowledge. Our data further substantiate the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT) recommendations to improve pharmacology education throughout the entire medical curriculum, e.g. by providing more training in simulated and clinical environments.

Keywords

Medical education Pharmacology Clinical pharmacology Knowledge Self-assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the people making the PJ-STArT-Block possible (a project initiated by several institutions of the University of Cologne, viz. Department of Palliative Medicine, Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Center of Pharmacology, Office of the Medical Faculty’s Dean of Studies, Kölner Interprofessionelles Skills Lab & Simulationszentrum, Institute for the History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, Institute of Comparative Education and Social Sciences). Alumni data were collected by the University of Cologne (Evaluation of Studies and Teaching | Higher Education Research Institute).

Contribution of authors

JM wrote the paper. SH, WJ and JM designed the study. WJ, BF and JM performed the research. WJ and JM analysed the data.

Funding information

This study was in parts supported financially by the rectorate of the University of Cologne.

References

  1. Aura SM, Sormunen MS, Jordan SE, Tossavainen KA, Turunen HE (2015) Learning outcomes associated with patient simulation method in pharmacotherapy education: an integrative review. Simul Healthc 10:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanch-Hartigan D (2011) Medical students’ self-assessment of performance: results from three meta-analyses. Pat Educ Counsel 84:3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) (2017) Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020, URL https://www.bmbf.de/files/2017-03-31_Masterplan%20Beschlusstext.pdfGoogle Scholar
  4. Brinkman DJ, Tichelaar J, van Agtmael MA, Schotsman R, de Vries TP, Richir MC (2014) The prescribing performance and confidence of final-year medical students. Clin Pharmacol Ther 96(5):531–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkman DJ, Tichelaar J, Schutte T, Benemei S, Böttiger Y, Chamontin B, Christiaens T, Likic R, Mačìulaitis R, Marandi T, Monteiro EC, Papaioannidou P, Pers YM, Pontes C, Raskovic A, Regenthal R, Sanz EJ, Tamba BI, Wilson K, Vries T, Richir MC, Agtmael MV, Working Group Research on CPT Education of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT) (2017a) Essential competencies in prescribing: a first european cross-sectional study among 895 final-year medical students. Clin Pharmacol Ther 101(2):281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brinkman DJ, van Rossem AP, Tichelaar J, Richir MC, van Agtmael MA (2017b) Does medical students knowing more about drugs lead to better treatment choices? J Clin Pharmacol 57(8):1071–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinkman DJ, Tichelaar J, Okorie M, Bissell L, Christiaens T, Likic R, Mačìulaitis R, Costa J, Sanz EJ, Tamba BI, Maxwell SR, Richir MC, van Agtmael MA, Education Working Group of the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT) (2017c) Pharmacology and therapeutics education in the European Union needs harmonization and modernization: a cross-sectional survey among 185 medical schools in 27 countries. Clin Pharmacol Ther 102(5):815–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinkman DJ, Tichelaar J, Graaf S, Otten RHJ, Richir MC, van Agtmael MA (2018) Do final-year medical students have sufficient prescribing competencies? A systematic literature review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 84(4):615–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dafsari HS, Herzig S, Matthes J (2017) A multi-centre student survey on weighing disciplines in medical curricula—a pilot study. GMS J Med Educ 34(2):Doc24Google Scholar
  10. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L (2006) Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence. JAMA 296(9):1094–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dean B, Schachter M, Vincent C, Barber N (2002) Causes of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a prospective study. Lancet 359(9315):1373–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Vries TPGM, Henning RH, Hogerzeil HV, Fresle DA (1994) Guide to good prescribing. A practical manual. Geneva: World Health Organization Action Programme on Essential DrugsGoogle Scholar
  13. Dormann H, Sonst A, Müller F, Vogler R, Patapovas A, Pfistermeister B, Plank-Kiegele B, Kirchner M, Hartmann N, Bürkle T, Maas R (2013) Adverse drug events in older patients admitted as an emergency: the role of potentially inappropriate medication in elderly people (PRISCUS). Dtsch Arztebl Int 110(13):213–219Google Scholar
  14. Dornan T, Ashcroft D, Heathfield H, Lewis P, Miles J, Taylor D, Tully M, Wass V (2009) An in depth investigation into causes of prescribing errors by foundation trainees in relation to their medical education. EQUIP study. General Medical Council. Available from URL http://www.gmc-uk.org/FINAL_Report_prevalence_and_causes_of_prescribing_errors.pdf_28935150.pdf
  15. Eva KW, Regehr G (2011) Exploring the divergence between self-assessment and self-monitoring. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 16(3):311–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer MR, Bauer D, Mohn K; NKLM-Projektgruppe (2015) Finally finished! National competence based catalogues of learning objectives for undergraduate medical education (NKLM) and dental education (NKLZ) ready for trial. GMS Z Med Ausbild 32(3): Doc35Google Scholar
  17. Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR (2000) BEME guide no. 1: best evidence medical education. Med Teach 21(6):253–262Google Scholar
  18. Hauser K, Koerfer A, Niehaus M, Albus C, Herzig S, Matthes J (2017) The prescription talk—an approach to teach patient-physician conversation about drug prescription to medical students. GMS J med Educ 34(2): Doc18Google Scholar
  19. Hauser K, Matthes J (2017) Medical students’ medication communication skills regarding drug prescription-a qualitative analysis of simulated physician-patient consultations. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 73(4):429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johannsen W (2012) Einfluss realitätsnaher Szenarien mit Simulationspatienten auf studentische Selbsteinschätzungen pharmakologischer Expertise und Verbesserungsvorschläge für die pharmakologische Ausbildung – eine Interview- und Fragebogenstudie. Dissertation, University of CologneGoogle Scholar
  21. Kampmeyer D, Matthes J, Herzig S (2015) Lucky guess or knowledge: a cross-sectional study using the bland and Altman analysis to compare confidence-based testing of pharmacological knowledge in 3rd and 5th year medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 20(2):431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R (2004) A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Publ Opinion Quart 68:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keijsers CJ, Ross S (2015) A pharmacological approach to education. Br J Clin Pharmacol 80(3):329–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller GE (1990) The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 65(Suppl):S63–S67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ross S, Loke YK (2009) Do educational interventions improve prescribing by medical students and junior doctors? A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 67(6):662–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ross S, Ryan C, Duncan EM, Francis JJ, Johnston M, Ker JS, Lee AJ, MacLeod MJ, Maxwell S, McKay G, McLay J, Webb DJ, Bond C (2013) Perceived causes of prescribing errors by junior doctors in hospital inpatients: a study from the PROTECT programme. BMJ Qual Saf 22(2):97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryan C, Ross S, Davey P, Duncan EM, Francis JJ, Fielding S, Johnston M, Ker J, Lee AJ, MacLeod MJ, Maxwell S, McKay GA, McLay JS, Webb DJ, Bond C (2014) Prevalence and causes of prescribing errors: the prescribing outcomes for trainee doctors engaged in clinical training (PROTECT) study. PLoS One 9(1):e79802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schiessl C, Hallal H, Johannsen W, Kliche O, Neumann E, Thrien C, Stosch C (2010) Gut vorbereitet ins Praktische Jahr mit dem Kölner PJ-STArT-Block. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung (GMA). Bochum, 23.-25.09.2010. Düsseldorf: German medical science GMS publishing house. Doc10gma66Google Scholar
  29. Seifert R (2018) Basiswissen Pharmakologie. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. Van der Vleuten CPM, Dolmans DHJM, Scherpbier AJJA (2000) The need for evidence in education. Med Teach 22(3):246–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ward M, Gruppen L, Regehr G (2002) Measuring self-assessment: current state of the art. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 7(1):63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watmough S, Cherry MG, O'sullivan H (2012) A comparison of self-perceived competencies of traditional and reformed curriculum graduates 6 years after graduation. Med Teach 34(7):562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Hoonhout LH, Waaijman R, Smits M, Hout FA, Zwaan L, Christiaans-Dingelhoff I, Timmermans DR, Groenewegen PP, van der Wal G (2009) Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Qual Saf Health Care 18(4):297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wencke Johannsen
    • 1
  • Bernhard Frings
    • 1
  • Stefan Herzig
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jan Matthes
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Center of PharmacologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.TH Köln - Technology, Arts, SciencesUniversity of Applied SciencesCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations