Advertisement

Expression and functional properties of canine, rat, and murine histamine H4 receptors in Sf9 insect cells

  • David Schnell
  • Irena Brunskole
  • Katerina Ladova
  • Erich H. Schneider
  • Patrick Igel
  • Stefan Dove
  • Armin Buschauer
  • Roland SeifertEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The histamine H4 receptor (H4R) is expressed on cells of the immune system including eosinophils, dendritic cells, and T cells and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma, atopic dermatitis, and pruritus. Analysis of the H4R in these diseases depends on the use of animal models. However, there are substantial pharmacological differences between various H4R species orthologs. The purpose of this study was to analyze the pharmacological properties of canine, rat, and murine H4R in comparison to human H4R expressed in Sf9 insect cells. Only hH4R and cH4R exhibited a sufficiently high [3H]histamine affinity for radioligand binding studies. Generally, cH4R exhibited lower ligand-affinities than hH4R. Similarly, in high-affinity GTPase studies, ligands were more potent at hH4R than at other H4R species orthologs. Unlike the other H4R species orthologs, hH4R exhibited high agonist-independent (constitutive) activity. Most strikingly, the prototypical H4R antagonist (1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine) (JNJ7777120) exhibited partial agonistic activity at cH4R, rH4R, and mH4R, whereas at hH4R, JNJ7777120 was a partial inverse agonist. H4R agonists from the class of N G -acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines and cyanoguanidines exhibited substantial differences in terms of affinity, potency, and efficacy among H4R species orthologs, too. The species-dependent pharmacological profiles are not due to the highly variable amino acid sequence position 341. Finally, H4R species orthologs differ from each other in terms of regulation by NaCl. Collectively, there are profound pharmacological differences between H4R species orthologs. Most importantly, caution must be exerted when interpreting pharmacological effects of “the prototypical H4R antagonist” JNJ7777120 as H4R antagonism.

Keywords

Histamine H4 receptor Histamine Receptor species orthologs JNJ7777120 GTPase Sf9 insect cells 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Mrs. Gertraud Wilberg and Mrs. Astrid Seefeld for expert technical assistance. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, research training program GRK 760 “Medicinal Chemistry: Molecular Recognition—Ligand-Receptor Interactions” and program project SFB 587 “Immune Reactions of the Lung in Infection and Allergy”) and the COST program BM0806 (H4R network) of the European Union. Thanks are also due to Dr. R. Thurmond for helpful discussion and generously providing cDNAs for cH4R, rH4R and mH4R, and JNJ7777120. We also thank the reviewers for their helpful critique.

References

  1. Black JW, Duncan WA, Durant CJ, Ganellin CR, Parsons EM (1972) Definition and antagonism of histamine H2-receptors. Nature 236:385–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckland KF, Williams TJ, Conroy DM (2003) Histamine induces cytoskeletal changes in human eosinophils via the H4-receptor. Br J Pharmacol 140:1117–1127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coruzzi G, Adami M, Guaita E, de Esch IJ, Leurs R (2007) Antiinflammatory and antinociceptive effects of the selective histamine H4-receptor antagonists JNJ7777120 and VUF6002 in a rat model of carrageenan-induced acute inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol 563:240–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costa T, Lang J, Gless C, Herz A (1990) Spontaneous association between opioid receptors and GTP-binding regulatory proteins in native membranes: specific regulation by antagonists and sodium ions. Mol Pharmacol 37:383–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowden JM, Zhang M, Dunford PJ, Thurmond RL (2010) The histamine H4 receptor mediates inflammation and pruritus in Th2-dependent dermal inflammation. J Invest Dermatol 130:1023–1033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deml KF, Beermann S, Neumann D, Strasser A, Seifert R (2009) Interactions of histamine H1-receptor agonists and antagonists with the human histamine H4-receptor. Mol Pharmacol 76:1019–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunford PJ, O’Donnell N, Riley JP, Williams KN, Karlsson L, Thurmond RL (2006) The histamine H4 receptor mediates allergic airway inflammation by regulating the activation of CD4+ T cells. J Immunol 176:7062–7070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Galandrin S, Bouvier M (2006) Distinct signalling profiles of β1 and β2 adrenergic receptor ligands toward adenylyl cyclase and mitogen-activated protein kinase reveals the pluridimensionality of efficacy. Mol Pharmacol 70:1575–1584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hagelüken A, Burde R, Nürnberg B, Harhammer R, Buschauer A, Seifert R (1995) Cationic-amphiphilic arpromidine-derived guanidines and a histamine trifluoromethyl-toluidide derivative may activate pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins by a receptor-independent mechanism. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 351:305–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hill SJ, Ganellin CR, Timmerman H, Schwartz JC, Shankley NP, Young JM, Schunack W, Levi R, Haas HL (1997) International Union of Pharmacolpgy XIII. Classification of histamine receptors. Pharmacol Rev 49:253–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Igel P, Schneider E, Schnell D, Elz S, Seifert R, Buschauer A (2009a) N G-Acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines as potent histamine H4 receptor agonists: selectivity by variation of the N G-substituent. J Med Chem 52:2623–2627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Igel P, Geyer R, Strasser A, Dove S, Seifert R, Buschauer A (2009b) Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of cyanoguanidine-type and structurally related histamine H4 receptor agonists. J Med Chem 52:6297–6313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Igel P, Dove S, Buschauer A (2010) Histamine H4 receptor agonists. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20:7191–7199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang W, Lim HD, Zhang M, Desai P, Dai H, Colling PM, Leurs R, Thurmond RL (2008) Cloning and pharmacological characterization of the dog histamine H4 receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 592:26–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelley MT, Bürckstümmer T, Wenzel-Seifert K, Dove S, Buschauer A, Seifert R (2001) Distinct interaction of human and guinea pig histamine H2-receptor with guanidine-type agonists. Mol Pharmacol 60:1210–1225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kenakin T, Miller LJ (2010) Seven transmembrane receptors as shapeshifting proteins: the impact of allosteric modulation and functional selectivity on new drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev 62:265–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leurs R, Chazot PL, Shenton FC, Lim HD, de Esch IJ (2009) Molecular and biochemical pharmacology of the histamine H4 receptor. Br J Pharmacol 157:14–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lim HD, van Rijn RM, Ling P, Bakker RA, Thurmond RL, Leurs R (2005) Evaluation of histamine H1-, H2-, and H3-receptor ligands at the human histamine H4 receptor: Identification of 4-methylhistamine as the first potent and selective H4 receptor agonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 314:1310–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lim HD, Jongejan A, Bakker RA, Haaksma E, de Esch IJ, Leurs R (2008) Phenylalanine 169 in the second extracellular loop of the human histamine H4 receptor is responsible for the difference in agonist binding between human and mouse H4 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 327:88–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim HD, de Graaf C, Jiang W, Sadek P, McGovern PM, Istyastono EP, Bakker RA, de Esch IJP, Thurmond RL, Leurs R (2010) Molecular determinants of ligand binding to H4R species variants. Mol Pharmacol 77:734–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ling P, Ngo K, Nguyen S, Thurmond RL, Edwards JP, Karlsson L, Fung-Leung WP (2004) Histamine H4 receptor mediates eosinophil chemotaxis with shape change and adhesion molecule upregulation. Br J Pharmacol 142:161–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu C, Wilson SJ, Kuei C, Lovenberg TW (2001) Comparison of human, mouse, rat, and guinea pig histamine H4 receptors reveals substantial pharmacological species variation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 299:121–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitsuhashi M, Misuhashi T, Payan DG (1989) Multiple signalling pathways of histamine H2 receptors. Identification of an H2 receptor-dependent Ca2+ mobilization pathway in human HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells. J Biol Chem 264:18356–18362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan RK, McAllister B, Cross L, Green DS, Kornfeld H, Center DM, Cruikshank WW (2007) Histamine 4 receptor activation induces recruitment of FoxP3+ T cells and inhibits allergic asthma in a murine model. J Immunol 178:8081–8089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Neumann D, Beermann S, Seifert R (2010) Does the histamine H4 receptor have a pro- or anti-inflammatory role in murine bronchial asthma? Pharmacology 85:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Reilly M, Alpert R, Jenkinson S, Gladue RP, Foo S, Trim S, Peter B, Trevethick M, Fidock M (2002) Identification of a histamine H4 receptor on human eosinophils—role in eosinophil chemotaxis. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 22:431–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Preuss H, Ghorai P, Kraus A, Dove S, Buschauer A, Seifert R (2007) Constitutive activity and ligand selectivity of human, guinea pig, rat, and canine histamine H2 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 321:983–995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rajagopal S, Rajagopal K, Lefkowitz RJ (2010) Teaching old receptors new tricks: biasing seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:373–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosethorne EM, Charlton SJ (2011) Agonist-biased signalling at the histamine H4 receptor: JNJ7777120 recruits beta-arrestin without activating G proteins. Mol Pharmacol in press PMID:21134907Google Scholar
  30. Ross EM, Wilkie TM (2000) GTPase-activating proteins for heterotrimeric G proteins: regulators of G protein signalling (RGS) and RGS-like proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 69:795–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rossbach K, Wendorff S, Sander K, Stark H, Gutzmer R, Werfel T, Kietzmann M, Bäumer W (2009a) Histamine H4 receptor antagonism reduces hapten-induced scratching behaviour but not inflammation. Exp Dermatol 18:57–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rossbach K, Stark H, Sander K, Leurs R, Kietzmann M, Bäumer W (2009b) The histamine H4 receptor as a new target for treatment of canine inflammatory skin disease. Vet Dermatol 20:555–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneider EH, Seifert R (2009) Histamine H4 receptor-RGS fusion proteins expressed in Sf9 insect cells: a sensitive and reliable approach for the functional characterization of histamine H4 receptor ligands. Biochem Pharmacol 78:607–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schneider EH, Seifert R (2010a) Sf9 cells: a versatile model system to investigate the pharmacological properties of G protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol Ther 128:387–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider EH, Seifert R (2010b) Co-expression systems as models for the analysis of constitutive GPCR activity. Methods Enzymol 485:527–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schneider EH, Seifert R (2010c) Fusion proteins as model systems for the analysis of constitutive GPCR activity. Methods Enzymol 485:459–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schneider EH, Schnell D, Papa D, Seifert R (2009) High constitutive activity and a G-protein-independent high-affinity state of the human histamine H4-receptor. Biochemistry 48:1424–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schneider EH, Schnell D, Strasser A, Dove S, Seifert R (2010a) Impact of the DRY motif and the missing “ionic lock” on constitutive activity and G-protein coupling of the human histamine H4 receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 333:382–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneider EH, Strasser A, Thurmond RL, Seifert R (2010b) Structural requirements for inverse agonism and neutral antagonism of indole-, benzimidazole-, and thienopyrrole-derived histamine H4 receptor ligands. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 334:513–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schnell D, Seifert R (2010) Modulation of histamine H3 receptor function by monovalent ions. Neurosci Lett 472:114–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schnell D, Burleigh K, Trick J, Seifert R (2010a) No evidence for functional selectivity of proxyfan at the human histamine H3 receptor coupled to defined Gi/Go protein heterotrimers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 332:996–1005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schnell D, Strasser A, Seifert R (2010b) Comparison of the pharmacological properties of human and rat histamine H3-receptors. Biochem Pharmacol 80:1437–1449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seifert R, Dove S (2009) Functional selectivity of GPCR ligand stereoisomers: new pharmacological opportunities. Mol Pharmacol 75:13–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seifert R, Wenzel-Seifert K (2002) Constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors: cause of disease and common property of wild-type receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 366:381–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seifert R, Wenzel-Seifert K, Bürckstümmer T, Pertz HH, Schunack W, Dove S, Buschauer A, Elz S (2003) Multiple differences in agonist and antagonist pharmacology between human and guinea pig histamine H1-receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305:1104–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seifert R, Schneider EH, Dove S, Brunskole I, Neumann D, Strasser A, Buschauer A (2011) Paradoxical stimulatory effects of the “standard” histamine H4-receptor antagonist JNJ7777120: The H4-receptor joins the club of 7TM receptors exhibiting functional selectivity. Mol Pharmacol (in press) PMID:21266488Google Scholar
  47. Söhlemann P, Hekman M, Puzicha M, Buchen C, Lohse MJ (1995) Binding of purified recombinant β-arrestin to guanine-nucleotide-binding-protein-coupled receptors. Eur J Biochem 232:464–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strakhova MI, Cuff CA, Manelli AM, Carr TL, Witte DG, Baranowski JL, Vortherms TA, Miller TR, Rundell L, McPherson MJ, Adair RM, Brito AA, Bettencourt BM, Yao BB, Wetter JM, Marsh KC, Liu H, Cowart MD, Brioni JD, Esbenshade TA (2009) In vitro and in vivo characterization of A-940894: a potent H4 receptor antagonist with anti-inflammatory properties. Br J Pharmacol 157:44–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strange PG (2010) Use of the GTPγS ([35S]GTPγS and Eu-GTPγS) binding assay for analysis of ligand potency and efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors. Br J Pharmacol 161:1238–1249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thurmond RL, Gelfand EW, Dunford PJ (2008) The role of histamine H1 and H4 receptors in allergic inflammation: the search for new antihistamines. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7:41–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tiligada E, Zampeli E, Sander K, Stark H (2009) Histamine H3 and H4 receptors as novel drug targets. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18:1519–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walseth TF, Johnson RA (1979) The enzymatic preparation of [α-32P]nucleoside triphosphates and cyclic [32P]AMP, and cyclic [32P]GMP. Biochim Biophys Acta 562:11–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wenzel-Seifert K, Hurt CM, Seifert R (1998) High constitutive activity of the human formyl peptide receptor. J Biol Chem 273:24181–24189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Schnell
    • 1
  • Irena Brunskole
    • 2
  • Katerina Ladova
    • 2
  • Erich H. Schneider
    • 1
  • Patrick Igel
    • 2
  • Stefan Dove
    • 2
  • Armin Buschauer
    • 2
  • Roland Seifert
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry IIUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  3. 3.Institute for PharmacologyMedical School of HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations