Advertisement

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology

, Volume 366, Issue 5, pp 482–487 | Cite as

Electrophysiological and antiarrhythmic effects of the novel IKur channel blockers, S9947 and S20951, on left vs. right pig atrium in vivo in comparison with the IKr blockers dofetilide, azimilide, d,l-sotalol and ibutilide

  • Karsten Knobloch
  • Joachim Brendel
  • Stefan Peukert
  • Björn Rosenstein
  • Andreas E. Busch
  • Klaus J. Wirth
Original Article

Abstract.

Inhibition of the cardiac Kv1.5 channel, the molecular base for the human cardiac ultrarapid delayed rectifier potassium current (IKur), is considered a new promising atrial selective antiarrhythmic concept since this channel is presumed to contribute to atrial but not ventricular repolarization in the human heart. In a previous study in pigs we found clear baseline differences in refractoriness between left and right atrium with shorter effective refractory periods (ERPs) of the left atrium associated with a high left atrial vulnerability for tachyarrhythmias. In this newly established model we compared atrial and ventricular effects of two novel IKur blockers, S9947 and S20951, with the IKr blockers dofetilide, azimilide, ibutilide and d,l-sotalol. In pentobarbital anesthetized pigs (n=45) we determined ERPs in the free walls of both atria with the S1-S2-stimulus method at three basic cycle lengths (BCL 240/300/400 ms) and QTc-intervals. The incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias triggered by the S2-extrastimulus of the left atrium was evaluated (referred to as left atrial vulnerability).

In contrast to IKr blockade, IKur blockade had no effect on the QT-interval, but prolonged the atrial ERP. The IKur blockers were significantly stronger on left atrial ERP, IKr blockers on right atrial ERP (P<0.05 for all compounds tested). At 240 ms BCL the IKur blocker S20951, 3 mg/kg, prolonged left vs. right atrial ERP by 28±5 ms vs. 12±3 ms and S9947, 3 mg/kg, by 45±7 ms vs. 19±6 ms. By contrast the effect of dofetilide, 10 µg/kg, was stronger on the right than left atrium (47±6 ms vs. 25±2 ms), a profile also found with azimilide (5 mg/kg, 43±3 ms vs. 17±3 ms), ibutilide (15 µg/kg, 70±10 ms vs. 29±4 ms) and d,l-sotalol (1.5 mg/kg, 57±6 ms vs. 36±4 ms). The IKur blockers, S20951and S9947, significantly decreased left atrial vulnerability (–82% and –100%, respectively, P<0.01) in contrast to the selective IKr blocker dofetilide (–14%; n.s.).

In conclusion, IKur and IKr blockers showed substantial differences in their atrial and ventricular actions in pigs. IKr blockers were stronger on right atrial ERP, IKur blockers on left atrial ERP, suggesting interatrial differences in the expression of potassium channels. In contrast to selective IKr blockade, IKur blockade inhibited left atrial vulnerability and had no effect on the QT-interval. Thus, blockade of IKur seems to be a promising atrial selective antiarrhythmic concept.

Kv1.5 channel IKur Pigs Effective refractory period IKr blocker Atrial vulnerability QT-interval 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karsten Knobloch
    • 1
  • Joachim Brendel
    • 1
  • Stefan Peukert
    • 1
  • Björn Rosenstein
    • 1
  • Andreas E. Busch
    • 1
  • Klaus J. Wirth
    • 1
  1. 1.DG Cardiovascular Diseases, Aventis Pharma, Industriepark Höchst, H813, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Personalised recommendations