Advertisement

Mathematische Zeitschrift

, Volume 292, Issue 1–2, pp 267–305 | Cite as

Signature characters of invariant Hermitian forms on irreducible Verma modules and Hall–Littlewood polynomials

  • Wai Ling YeeEmail author
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

The Unitary Dual Problem is one of mathematics’ most important open problems: classify the irreducible unitary representations of a group. The general approach has been to classify all representations admitting non-degenerate invariant Hermitian forms, compute the signatures of those forms, and then determine which forms are positive definite. Signature character algorithms and formulas arising from deforming representations and analysing changes at reducibility points, as in Adams et al. (Unitary representations of real reductive groups (ArXiv e-prints), 2012) and Yee (Represent Theory 9:638–677, 2005), produce very complicated formulas or algorithms from the resulting recursion. This paper shows that in the case of irreducible Verma modules all of the complexity can be encapsulated by the affine Hecke algebra: for compact real forms and for alcoves corresponding to translations of the fundamental alcove by a regular weight, signature characters of irreducible Verma modules are in fact “negatives” of Hall–Littlewood polynomial summands evaluated at \(q=-\,1\) times a version of the Weyl denominator, establishing a simple signature character formula and drawing an important connection between signature characters and the affine Hecke algebra. Signature characters of irreducible highest weight modules are shown to be related to Kazhdan-Lusztig basis elements. This paper also handles noncompact real forms. The current state of the art for the unitary dual is a computer algorithm for determining if a given representation is unitary. These results suggest the potential to move the state of the art to a closed form classification for the entire unitary dual.

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 22E50 Secondary 05E10 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Jeff Adams for very helpful and supportive conversations. I would like to thank the numerous people, especially M, who supported and helped me through illness which ultimately made this paper possible. I would also like to thank the referee for very helpful comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, J., Vogan Jr., D.A.: \(L\)-groups, projective representations, and the Langlands classification. Am. J. Math. 114(1), 45–138 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, J., van Leeuwen, M., Trapa, P., Vogan, D.A. : Jr. Unitary representations of real reductive groups (2012). (ArXiv e-prints) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beilinson, A., Bernstein, J.: A proof of Jantzen conjectures. In I. M. Gelfand Seminar, Adv. Soviet Math., vol. 16, pp. 1–50. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciubotaru, D.: Tutorial on affine Hecke algebras. http://www2.ims.nus.edu.sg/Programs/016theory/files/dan.pdf, (2016). Accessed 25 Apr 2017
  5. 5.
    Deodhar, V.V.: Some characterizations of Bruhat ordering on a Coxeter group and determination of the relative Möbius function. Invent. Math. 39(2), 187–198 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyer, M.J.: Hecke algebras and reflections in Coxeter groups, Ph.D. thesis. University of Sydney, Sydney (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaussent, S., Littelmann, P.: LS galleries, the path model, and MV cycles. Duke Math. J. 127(1), 35–88 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gelfand, I.M.: Collected Papers, vol. I. Springer, Berlin. With remarks by V. W. Guillemin and S. Sternberg (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green, J.A.: The characters of the finite general linear groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 80, 402–447 (1955)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall, P.: The Algebra of Partitions. Proceedings of the Fourth Canadian Mathematical Congress: Banff, pp. 147–159. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (1959)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Humphreys, J.E.: Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kazhdan, D., Lusztig, G.: Representations of Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras. Invent. Math. 53, 165–184 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knapp, A.W.: Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 140, 2nd edn. Birkhäuser, Boston (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knapp, A.W., Vogan Jr., D.A.: Cohomological Induction and Unitary Representations, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 45. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuznetsov, V.B., Sahi, S. (eds.): Jack, Hall–Littlewood and Macdonald Polynomials. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 417. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenart, C.: Hall–Littlewood polynomials, alcove walks, and fillings of Young diagrams. Discrete Math. 311(4), 258–275 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Littlewood, D.E.: On certain symmetric functions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 11, 485–498 (1961)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Littelmann, P.: A Littlewood–Richardson rule for symmetrizable Kac–Moody algebras. Invent. Math. 116(1–3), 329–346 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lenart, C., Postnikov, A.: Affine Weyl groups in \(K\)-theory and representation theory. Int. Math. Res. Notices 12, Art. ID rnm03865 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lenart, C., Postnikov, A.: A combinatorial model for crystals of Kac–Moody algebras. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 360(8), 4349–4381 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lusztig, G.: Affine Hecke algebras and their graded version. J. Am. Math. Soc. 2(3), 599–635 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macdonald, I.G.: Spherical functions on a group of \(p\)-adic type. Ramanujan Institute, Centre for Advanced Study in Mathematics, University of Madras, Madras. Publications of the Ramanujan Institute, No. 2 (1971)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Macdonald, I.G.: Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials. Oxford Classic Texts in the Physical Sciences, 2nd edn. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nelsen, K., Ram, A.: Kostka–Foulkes polynomials and Macdonald spherical functions. In: Surveys in Combinatorics, 2003 (Bangor), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 307, pp. 325–370. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ram, A.: Alcove walks, Hecke algebras, spherical functions, crystals and column strict tableaux. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 2(4, Special Issue: In honor of Robert D. MacPherson. Part 2), 963–1013 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Salamanca-Riba, S.A.: On the unitary dual of real reductive Lie groups and the \(A_{{\mathfrak{q}}}(\lambda )\) modules: the strongly regular case. Duke Math. J. 96(3), 521–546 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schwer, C.: Galleries, Hall–Littlewood polynomials, and structure constants of the spherical Hecke algebra. Int. Math. Res. Notices 31, Art. ID 75395 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vogan, D.A.: Unitarizability of certain series of representations. Ann. Math. 120, 141–187 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wallach, N.R.: On the unitarizability of derived functor modules. Invent. Math. 78(1), 131–141 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yee, W.L.: The signature of the Shapovalov form on irreducible Verma modules. Represent. Theory 9, 638–677 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yee, W.L.: Signatures of invariant Hermitian forms on irreducible highest weight modules. Duke Math. J. 142, 165–196 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yee, W.L.: Relating signed and classical Kazhdan–Lusztig polynomials. Duke Math. J. 163(11), 2161–2178 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations