Mathematische Zeitschrift

, 263:221 | Cite as

Some characterizations of domination

Article

Abstract

We show that a cocycle has a dominated splitting if and only if there is a uniform exponential gap between singular values of its iterates. Then we consider sets Σ in \({{\rm GL}(d, \mathbb R)}\) with the property that any cocycle with values in Σ has a dominated splitting. We characterize these sets in terms of existence of invariant multicones, thus extending a two-dimensional result by Avila, Bochi, and Yoccoz. We give an example showing how these multicones can fail to have convexity properties.

References

  1. 1.
    Arnold L.: Random Dynamical Systems. Springer, Berlin (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avila, A., Bochi, J., Yoccoz, J.-C.: Uniformly hyperbolic finite-valued \({SL(2, \mathbb R)}\) -cocycles.http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0133
  3. 3.
    Bochi J., Viana M.: The Lyapunov exponents of generic volume preserving and symplectic maps. Ann. Math. 161, 1423–1485 (2005)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonatti C., Díaz L.J., Pujals E.R.: A C 1-generic dichotomy for diffeomorphisms: weak forms of hyperbolicity or infinitely many sinks or sources. Ann. Math. 158, 355–418 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonatti C., Díaz L.J., Viana M.: Dynamics Beyond Uniform Hyperbolicity: A Global Geometric and Probabilistic Perspective. Springer, Berlin (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bougerol P., Lacroix J.: Products of random matrices with applications to Schrödinger operators. Birkhäuser, Boston (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bylov, B.F., Vinograd, R.E., Grobman, D.M., Nemyckiĭ, V.V.: Theory of Lyapunov exponents and its application to problems of stability (Russian). Izdat. “Nauka”, Moscow (1966)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Groot J., de Vries H.: Convex sets in projective space. Composit. Math. 13, 113–118 (1958)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Díaz, L.J.: How to put a stop to domination once and for all (and what comes afterwards). In: Partially hyperbolic dynamics, laminations, and Teichmüller flow, pp. 3–33, Fields Inst. Commun., vol. 51. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gourmelon N.: Adapted metrics for dominated splittings. Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 27, 1839–1849 (2007)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liao S.T.: On the stability conjecture. Chin. Ann. Math. 1, 9–30 (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lillo J.C.: Perturbations of nonlinear systems. Acta Math. 103, 123–138 (1960)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mañé R.: Contributions to the stability conjecture. Topology 17, 383–396 (1978)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mañé, R.: Oseledec’s theorem from the generic viewpoint. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, vols. 1, 2 (Warsaw, 1983), pp. 1269–1276. PWN, Warsaw (1984)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Millionshchikov V.M.: Systems with integral division which are everywhere dense in the set of all linear systems of differential equations (Russian). Differ. Uravn. 5, 1167–1170 (1969)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palmer K.J.: Exponential separation, exponential dichotomy and spectral theory for linear systems of ordinary differential equations. J. Differ. Equ. 46, 324–345 (1982)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pujals, E.R.: Tangent bundles dynamics and its consequences. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. III (Beijing, 2002), pp. 327–338. Higher Ed. Press, Beijing (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pujals, E.R.: From hyperbolicity to dominated splitting. In: Partially hyperbolic dynamics, laminations, and Teichmüller flow, pp. 89–102, Fields Inst. Commun., vol. 51. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sacker R.J., Sell G.R.: A spectral theory for linear differential systems. J. Differ. Equ. 27, 320–358 (1978)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yoccoz, J.-C.: Some questions and remarks about \({{\rm SL}(2, \mathbb{R})}\) cocycles. In: Modern Dynamical Systems and Applications, pp. 447–458. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.IMPARio de JaneiroBrazil
  3. 3.IMBUniversité de Bordeaux IBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations