Mathematische Zeitschrift

, Volume 255, Issue 2, pp 245–282 | Cite as

Limit sets and strengths of convergence for sequences in the duals of thread-like Lie groups



We consider a properly converging sequence of non-characters in the dual space of a thread-like group \(G_N (N\geq {3})\) and investigate the limit set and the strength with which the sequence converges to each of its limits. We show that, if (π k ) is a properly convergent sequence of non-characters in \(\widehat{G}_N\), then there is a trade-off between the number of limits σ which are not characters, their degrees, and the strength of convergence i σ to each of these limits (Theorem 3.2). This enables us to describe various possibilities for maximal limit sets consisting entirely of non-characters (Theorem 4.6). In Sect. 5, we show that if (π k ) is a properly converging sequence of non-characters in\(\widehat{G}_N\) and if the limit set contains a character then the intersection of the set of characters (which is homeomorphic to \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\)) with the limit set has at most two components. In the case of two components, each is a half-plane. In Theorem 7.7, we show that if a sequence has a character as a cluster point then, by passing to a properly convergent subsequence and then a further subsequence, it is possible to find a real null sequence (c k ) (with \(c_k\ne 0\)) such that, for a in the Pedersen ideal of C *(G N ), \(\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} c_k {\rm Tr} ( \pi_k(a))\) exists (not identically zero) and is given by a sum of integrals over \(\mathbb{R}^{2}\).

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Primary 22D10 Primary 22D25 Primary 22E27 Secondary 46L30 Secondary 43A40 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Archbold R.J. (1994) Upper and lower multiplicity for irreducible representations of C*-algebras. Proc. London Math. Soc. 69(3): 121–143MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Archbold R.J., Kaniuth E. (1997) Simply connected nilpotent Lie groups with quasi-standard C*-algebras. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125, 2733–2742MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Archbold R.J., Spielberg J.S. (1996) Upper and lower multiplicity for irreducible representations of C*-algebras. II, J. Oper. Theory 36, 201–231MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Archbold R.J., Somerset D.W.B., Spielberg J.S. (1997) Upper multiplicity and bounded trace ideals in C*-algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 146, 430–463MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Archbold R.J., Kaniuth E., Schlichting G., Somerset D.W.B. (1999) On the topology of the dual of a nilpotent Lie group. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 125, 269–293MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Archbold R.J., Kaniuth E., Ludwig J., Schlichting G., Somerset D.W.B. (2001) Strength of convergence in duals of C*-algebras and nilpotent Lie groups. Adv. Math. 158, 26–65MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bekka M.B., Kaniuth E. (1988) Irreducible representations of locally compact groups that cannot be Hausdorff separated from the identity representation. J. Reine Angew. Math. 385, 203–220MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boidol J., Ludwig J., Müller D. (1988) On infinitely small orbits. Studia Math. 88, 1–11MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown I. (1973) Dual topology of a nilpotent Lie group. Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Sup. 6, 407–411MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corwin L., Greenleaf F.P. (1990) Representations of Nilpotent Lie Groups and Their Applications. Part 1: Basic Theory and Examples. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixmier J. (1968) Sur les espaces localement quasi-compact. Canad. J. Math. 20, 1093–1100MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dixmier, J. C*-algebras. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1977)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fell J.G.M. (1960) The dual spaces of C*-algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 94, 365–403MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaniuth E. (1999) Lower multiplicity for irreducible representations of nilpotent locally compact groups. J. Funct.Anal. 168, 313–326MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knuth D.E. (1973) The art of computer programming, vol 1. Fundamental algorithms. Addison Wesley, ReadingMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ludwig J. (1990) On the behaviour of sequences in the dual of a nilpotent Lie group. Math. Ann. 287, 239–257MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ludwig J., Rosenbaum G., Samuel J. (1986) The elements of bounded trace in the C*-algebra of a nilpotent Lie group. Invent. Math. 83, 167–190MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Milicic D. (1973) On C*-algebras with bounded trace. Glasnik Mat. 8, 7–21MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perdrizet F. (1971) Topologie et traces sur les C*algèbres. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 99, 193–239MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of Aberdeen, King’s CollegeScotlandUK
  2. 2.Département de Mathématiques, Île du SaulcyUniversité de MetzMetzFrance
  3. 3.Mathematisches InstitutTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations