The abelian monodromy extension property for families of curves
Article
First Online:
Received:
Abstract
Necessary and sufficient conditions are given (in terms of monodromy) for extending a family of smooth curves over an open subset \({U \subset S}\) to a family of stable curves over S. More precisely, we introduce the abelian monodromy extension (AME) property and show that the standard Deligne–Mumford compactification is the unique, maximal AME compactification of the moduli space of curves. We also show that the Baily–Borel compactification is the unique, maximal projective AME compactification of the moduli space of abelian varieties.
Keywords
Modulus Space Abelian Variety Exceptional Divisor Mapping Class Group Dehn Twist
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Abramovich, D., Olsson, M., Vistoli, A.: Tame stacks in positive characteristic. arXiv:0703310Google Scholar
- 2.Adem, A., Leida, J., Ruan, Y.: Orbifolds and Stringy Topology. Cambridge University Press, London, pp. xii+149 (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Altman A., Kleiman S.L.: On the purity of the branch locus. Compos. Math. Fasc. 23(4), 461–465 (1971)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 4.Ash, A., Mumford, D., Rapoport, M., Tai, Y.: Smooth Compactification of Locally Symmetric Varieties, Lie Groups: History, Frontiers and Applications, vol. IV. Math. Sci. Press, Brookline, pp. iv+335 (1975)Google Scholar
- 5.Borel A.: Some metric properties of arithmetic quotients of symmetric space and an extension theorem. J. Diff. Geom. 6, 543–560 (1972)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 6.Birman J., Lubotzky A., McCarthy J.: Abelian and solvable subgroups of the mapping class groups. Duke Math. J. 50(4), 1107–1120 (1983)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 7.Boggi, M.: Monodromy of stable curves of compact type: rigidity and extension. Int. Math. Res. Not., no. 6, Article ID rnm017, p 16 (2007)Google Scholar
- 8.Cattani, E.: Mixed Hodge structures, compactifications and monodromy weight filtration, Topics in transcendental algebraic geometry (Princeton, NJ, 1981/1982). Ann. of Math. Stud., vol. 106, pp. 75–100, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1984)Google Scholar
- 9.Chai, C.-L., Faltings, G.: Degeneration of abelian varieties. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 3. Folge, Band 22, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. xii+316 (1990)Google Scholar
- 10.Deligne, P.: Théorie de Hodge II. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. No. 40, pp. 5–57 (1971)Google Scholar
- 11.Deligne, P., Mumford, D.: The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus, Publications mathématiques de l’I.H.É.S. tome 36, 75–109 (1969)Google Scholar
- 12.Donaldson, S.K.: Polynomials, vanishing cycles and Floer homology. Mathematics: Frontiers and Perspectives. Am. Math. Soc., Providence, pp. 55–64 (2000)Google Scholar
- 13.Erdenberger C., Grushevsky S., Hulek K.: Intersection theory of toroidal compactifications of \({{\mathcal A}_4}\). Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 38(3), 396–400 (2006)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 14.Grothendieck, A., Murre, J.: The tame fundamental group of a formal neighbourhood of a divisor with normal crossings on a scheme. LNM, vol. 208. Springer, Heidelberg (1971)Google Scholar
- 15.Grothendieck, A.: Exposé IX; Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique 7Google Scholar
- 16.Harris, J., Morrison, I.: Moduli of Curves, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 187, pp. xiv+366 Springer, New York (1998)Google Scholar
- 17.Kollár, J.: Fundamental groups of rationally connected varieties. Mich. Math. J. 48, 359–368 (2000) arXiv:math.AG/0203174Google Scholar
- 18.Keel S., Mori S.: Quotients by groupoids. Ann. Math. 145, 193–213 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kresch A., Vistoli A.: On coverings of Deligne–Mumford stacks and surjectivity of the Brauer map. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 36(2), 188–192 (2004)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ivanov, N.V.: Automorphisms of Teichmüller modular groups. Lectures Notes in Math., vol. 1346, pp. 199–270. Springer, Berlin (1988)Google Scholar
- 21.Jong A.J., Oort F.: On extending families of curves. J. Algebraic Geom. 6(3), 545–562 (1997)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 22.Landman A.: On the Picard–Lefschetz transformation for algebraic manifolds acquiring general singularities. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 181, 89–126 (1973)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 23.Looijenga E.: Smooth Deligne–Mumford compactifications by means of Prym level structures. J. Algebraic Geom. 3(2), 283–293 (1994)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 24.Moret-Bailly L.: Un théorème de pureté pour les familles de courbes lisses. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 300(14), 489–492 (1985)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mochizuki S.: Extending families of curves over log regular schemes. J. Reine Angew. Math. 511, 43–71 (1999)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 26.Noohi, B.: Foundations of topological stacks I. math.AG/0503247Google Scholar
- 27.Saito T.: Log smooth extension of a family of curves and semi-stable reduction. J. Algebraic Geom. 13(2), 287–321 (2004)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 28.Schmid, W.: Abbildungen in arithmetische Quotienten hermitesch symmetrischer Räume (German). Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 412, pp. 243–258. Springer, Berlin (1974)Google Scholar
- 29.Stix J.: A monodromy criterion for extending curves. Int. Math. Res. Not. 29, 1787–1802 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 30.Vakil R.: The moduli space of curves and its tautological ring. Notices Am. Math. Soc. 50(6), 647–658 (2003)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag 2008