Advertisement

Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis

, Volume 192, Issue 3, pp 453–499 | Cite as

Existence of Atoms and Molecules in the Mean-Field Approximation of No-Photon Quantum Electrodynamics

  • Christian Hainzl
  • Mathieu Lewin
  • Éric Séré
Article

Abstract

The Bogoliubov–Dirac–Fock (BDF) model is the mean-field approximation of no-photon quantum electrodynamics. The present paper is devoted to the study of the minimization of the BDF energy functional under a charge constraint. An associated minimizer, if it exists, will usually represent the ground state of a system of N electrons interacting with the Dirac sea, in an external electrostatic field generated by one or several fixed nuclei. We prove that such a minimizer exists when a binding (HVZ-type) condition holds. We also derive, study and interpret the equation satisfied by such a minimizer. Finally, we provide two regimes in which the binding condition is fulfilled, obtaining the existence of a minimizer in these cases. The first is the weak coupling regime for which the coupling constant α is small whereas αZ and the particle number N are fixed. The second is the non-relativistic regime in which the speed of light tends to infinity (or equivalently α tends to zero) and Z, N are fixed. We also prove that the electronic solution converges in the non-relativistic limit towards a Hartree–Fock ground state.

Keywords

Lewin Quantum Electrodynamic Essential Spectrum Weak Coupling Regime Charge Sector 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson C.D.: The positive electron. Phys. Rev. 43, 491–494 (1933)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avron J., Seiler R., Simon B.: The index of a pair of projections. J. Funct. Anal. 120, 220–237 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bach V.: Error bound for the Hartree–Fock energy of atoms and molecules. Commun. Math. Phys. 147, 527–548 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bach V., Barbaroux J.-M., Helffer B., Siedentop H.: On the stability of the relativistic electron–positron field. Commun. Math. Phys. 201, 445–460 (1999)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bach V., Lieb E.H., Loss M., Solovej J.P.: There are no unfilled shells in unrestricted Hartree–Fock theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2981–2983 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bach V., Lieb E.H., Solovej J.P.: Generalized Hartree–Fock theory and the Hubbard model. J. Stat. Phys. 76(1–2), 3–89 (1994)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhatia R.: Matrix analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 169. Springer, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borwein J., Preiss D.: A smooth variational principle with applications to subdifferentiability and to differentiability of convex functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 303(2), 517–527 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaix, P.: Une Méthode de Champ Moyen Relativiste et Application à l’Etude du Vide de l’Electrodynamique Quantique. PhD Thesis, University Paris VI (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaix P., Iracane D.: From quantum electrodynamics to mean field theory: I. The Bogoliubov–Dirac–Fock formalism. J. Phys. B. 22, 3791–3814 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chaix P., Iracane D., Lions P.L.: From quantum electrodynamics to mean field theory: II. Variational stability of the vacuum of quantum electrodynamics in the mean-field approximation. J. Phys. B. 22, 3815–3828 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dietz K., Hess B.A.: Hartree–Fock-type equations in relativistic quantum electrodynamics with non-linear gauge fixing. J. Phys. E At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 24, 1129–1142 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dolbeault J., Esteban M.J., Séré E.: On the eigenvalues of operators with gaps. Application to Dirac operators. J. Funct. Anal. 174(1), 208–226 (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dirac P.A.M.: The quantum theory of the electron. Proc. R. Soc. A 117, 610–624 (1928)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dirac P.A.M.: A theory of electrons and protons. Proc. R. Soc. A 126, 360–365 (1930)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dirac, P.A.M.: Théorie du positron. Solvay report, pp.203–212 (1934). Gauthier-Villars, Paris. XXV, 353 SGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dirac P.A.M.: Discussion of the infinite distribution of electrons in the theory of the positron. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 30, 150–163 (1934)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Engel E., Dreizler R.M.: Field-theoretical approach to a relativistic Thomas–Fermi–Dirac–Weisäcker model. Phys. Rev. A 35(9), 3607–3618 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Esteban M.J., Séré E.: Solutions of the Dirac–Fock equations for atoms and molecules. Commun. Math. Phys. 203, 499–530 (1999)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Esteban M.J., Séré E.: Nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac–Fock equations. Ann. Henri Poincaré 2(5), 941–961 (2001)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Esteban M.J., Séré E.: A max-min principle for the ground state of the Dirac–Fock functional. Contemp. Math. 307, 135–141 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foldy L.L., Eriksen E.: Some physical consequences of vacuum polarization. Phys. Rev. 95(4), 1048–1051 (1954)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghoussoub N.: Duality and Perturbation Methods in Critical Point Theory. Cambridge University Press, London (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Glauber R., Rarita W., Schwed P.: Vacuum polarization effects on energy levels in μ-mesonic atoms. Phys. Rev. 120(2), 609–613 (1960)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gomberoff L., Tolmachev V.: Hartree–Fock approximation in quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 3(8), 1796–1804 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Griesemer M., Lieb E.H., Loss M.: Ground states in non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics. Invent. Math. 145(3), 557–595 (2001)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hainzl C., Lewin M., Séré E.: Existence of a stable polarized vacuum in the Bogoliubov–Dirac–Fock approximation. Commun. Math. Phys. 257, 515–562 (2005)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hainzl C., Lewin M., Séré E.: Self-consistent solution for the polarized vacuum in a no-photon QED model. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 38, 4483–4499 (2005)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hainzl C., Lewin M., Solovej J.P.: The mean-field approximation in quantum electrodynamics. The no-photon case. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 60(4), 546–596 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hamm A., Schütte D.: How to remove divergences from the QED-Hartree approximation. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 23, 3969–3982 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Heisenberg W.: Bemerkungen zur Diracschen Theorie des Positrons. Z. Phys. 90, 209–223 (1934)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hunziker W.: On the spectra of Schrödinger multiparticle Hamiltonians. Helv. Phys. Acta 39, 451–462 (1966)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kato T.: Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators. Springer, Heidelberg (1966)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kato, T.: Notes on projections and perturbation theory. Technical report No 9, University of California (1955)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Klaus M.: Non-regularity of the Coulomb potential in quantum electrodynamics. Helv. Phys. Acta 53, 36–39 (1980)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Klaus M., Scharf G.: The regular external field problem in quantum electrodynamics. Helv. Phys. Acta 50, 779–802 (1977)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lieb E.H.: Variational principle for Many-Fermion systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 457–459 (1981)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lieb E.H.: Bound on the maximum negative ionization of atoms and molecules. Phys. Rev. A. 29, 3018–3028 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lieb E.H., Loss M.: Existence of atoms and molecules in non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7(4), 667–710 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lieb E.H., Siedentop H.: Renormalization of the regularized relativistic electron–positron field. Commun. Math. Phys. 213(3), 673–683 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lieb E.H., Simon B.: The Hartree–Fock theory for Coulomb systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 53, 185–194 (1977)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lions, P.-L.: The concentration-compactness method in the Calculus of Variations. The locally compact case. Part. I: Anal. non-linéaire, Ann. IHP 1, 109–145 (1984). Part. II: Anal. non-linéaire, Ann. IHP 1, 223–283 (1984)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lions P.-L.: Solutions of Hartree–Fock equations for Coulomb systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 109, 33–97 (1987)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mohr P.J., Plunien G., Soff G.: QED corrections in heavy atoms. Phys. Rep. 293(5&6), 227–372 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nenciu G.: Existence of spontaneous pair creation in the external field approximation of Q.E.D. Commun. Math. Phys. 109, 303–312 (1987)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Paturel E.: Solutions of the Dirac equations without projector. Ann. Henri Poincaré 1, 1123–1157 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reinhard P.-G., Greiner W.: Quantum electrodynamics of strong fields. Rep. Prog. Phys. 40, 219–295 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reinhard P.-G., Greiner W., Arenhövel H.: Electrons in strong external fields. Nucl. Phys. A, 166, 173–197 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Reinhardt J., Müller B., Greiner W.: Theory of positron production in heavy-ion collision. Phys. Rev. A, 24(1), 103–128 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Reed, M., Simon, B.: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I. Functional Analysis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1980zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ruijsenaars S.N.M.: On Bogoliubov transformations for systems of relativistic charged particles. J. Math. Phys. 18(3), 517–526 (1977)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Scharf G., Seipp H.P.: Charged vacuum, spontaneous positron production and all that. Phys. Lett. 108B(3), 196–198 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schwinger J.: Quantum electrodynamics I. A covariant formulation. Phys. Rev. 74(10), 1439–1461 (1948)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schwinger J.: Quantum electrodynamics II. Vacuum polarization and self-energy. Phys. Rev. 75(4), 651–679 (1949)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schwinger J.: On Gauge invariance and vacuum polarization. Phys. Rev. II. Ser. 82(5), 664–679 (1951)ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Seiler E., Simon B.: Bounds in the Yukawa2 quantum field theory: upper bound on the pressure, Hamiltonian bound and linear lower bound. Commun. Math. Phys. 45, 99–114 (1975)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Simon, B.: Trace ideals and their applications. London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series, vol. 35. Cambridge University Press, London, 1979Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Swirles B.: The relativistic self-consistent field. Proc. R. Soc. A 152, 625–649 (1935)ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Thaller B.: The Dirac Equation. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tix C.: Lower bound for the ground state energy of the no-pair Hamiltonian. Phys. Lett. B 405, 293–296 (1997)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tix C.: Strict positivity of a relativistic Hamiltonian due to Brown and Ravenhall. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 30(3), 283–290 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Van Winter, C.: Theory of finite systems of particles. I. The Green function. Mat.-Fys. Skr. Danske Vid. Selsk. 2(8), (1964)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zhislin G.M.: A study of the spectrum of the Schrödinger operator for a system of several particles (Russian). Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obšč9, 81–120 (1960)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.CNRS and Département de Mathématiques (CNRS UMR 8088)Université de Cergy-PontoiseCergy-Pontoise CedexFrance
  3. 3.CEREMADE (CNRS UMR 7534)Université Paris-DauphineParis Cedex 16France

Personalised recommendations