Advertisement

Archives of Toxicology

, Volume 69, Issue 4, pp 235–241 | Cite as

Lactational exposure to methylmercury in the hamster

  • Kerstin Nordenhäll
  • Lennart Dock
  • Marie Vahter
Original Investigation

Abstract

Syrian Golden hamster dams were administered 203Hg-labelled methyl mercury (MeHg; 1.6 μmol/kg) 1 day after parturition and milk was collected twice during the 1st week. The excretion of 203Hg in milk and the uptake, retention and tissue distribution of 203Hg in the pups was studied using gamma counting. The fraction of inorganic Hg in milk and in the kidneys of the pups was determined following separation of inorganic Hg and MeHg by ion exchange chromatography. The concentration of 203Hg in milk on the 1st day after MeHg administration was 0.12 nmol/g. 203Hg was mainly (80–90%) excreted as MeHg during the first 6 days of lactation. The whole body and tissue concentration of 203Hg in the pups increased for 10–15 days and decreased thereafter. The content of 203Hg in the pelt and the fraction of inorganic Hg in the kidney increased throughout the study period (4 weeks). The excretion of MeHg in milk corresponded to at least 5% of the dose administered to the dam. Our study demonstrates that breast milk may be a significant source of MeHg exposure during the critical neonatal period.

Key words

Methylmercury Hamster Breast milk Mercury speciation Mercury distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amin-Zaki L, Elhassani S, Majeed MA, Clarkson TW, Doherty RA, Greenwood MR (1974) Studies of infants postnatally exposed to methylmercury. J Pediatr 85: 81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin-Zaki L, Elhassani S, Majeed MA, Clarksson TW, Doherty RA, Greenwood MR, Giovanoli-Jakubczak T (1976) Perinatal methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Am J Dis Child 130: 1070–1076PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin-Zaki L, Majeed MA, Greenwood MR, Elhassani SB, Clarksson TW, Doherty RA (1981) Methylmercury poisoning in the Iraqi suckling infant: a longitudinal study over five years. J Appl Toxicol 1: 210–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aschner M, Aschner JL (1990) Mercry neurotoxicity: mechanisms of blood-brain barrier transport. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 14 [2]: 169–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakir F, Damluji SF, Amin-Zaki L, Murtadha M, Khalidi A, Al-Rawi NY, Tikriti S, Dhahir HI, Clarkson TW, Smith JC, Doherty RA (1973) Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Science 181: 230–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi BH (1989) The effects of methylmercury on the developing brain. Prog Neurobiol 32: 447–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobbing J, Sands J (1973) Quantitative growth and development of human brain. Arch Dis Child 48: 757–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dock L, Rissanen R-L, Vahter M (1994) Demethylation and placental transfer of methyl mercury in the pregnant hamster. Toxicology 94: 131–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dock L, Rissanen R-L, Vahter M (1995) Metabolism of mercury in hamster pups administered a single dose of 203Hg-labeled methyl mercury. Pharmacol Toxicol 76: 80–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doherty RA, Gates AH, Landry TD (1977) Methylmercury excretion: developmental changes in mouse and man. Pediat Res 11: 416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falkmer S, Waller T (1984) Försöksdjursteknik. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm, p 70 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  12. Greenwood MR, Clarkson TW, Doherty RA, Gates AH, Amin-Zaki L, Elhassani S, Majeed MA (1978) Blood clearance half-times in lactating and nonlactating members of a population exposed to methylmercury. Environ Res 16: 48–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Habermann BH (1974) Mechanical collection from mice for Bittner virus isolation. Lab Anim Sci 24: 935–937Google Scholar
  14. Kjellström T, Kennedy P, Wallis S, Stewart A, Friberg L, Lind B, Wutherspoon P, Mantell C (1989) Physical and mental development of children with prenatal exposure to mercury from fish. Stage 2: interviews and psychological tests at age 6. National Swedish Environmental Protection Board Report 3642Google Scholar
  15. Kostial K, Kello D, Jugo S, Rabar I, Maljkovic T (1978) Influence of age on metal metabolism and toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 25: 81–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kostial K, Simonovic I, Rabar I, Blanusa M, Landeka M (1983) Age and intestinal retention of mercury and cadmium in rats. Environ Res 31: 111–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lok E (1983) The effect of weaning on blood, hair, fecal and urinary mercury after chronic ingestion of methylmercuric chloride by infant monkeys. Toxicol Lett 15: 147–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. May K, Stoeppler M, Reisinger K (1987) Studies in the ratio total mercury/methylmercury in the aquatic food chain. Toxicol Environ Chem 13: 153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miettinen JK (1973) Absorption and elimination of dietary mercury (Hg2+) and methylmercury in man. In: Miller MW, Clarkson TW (eds) Mercury, mercurials and mercaptans. Charles C Thomas, Springfield Ill. pp 233–243Google Scholar
  20. Naganuma A, Koyama Y, Imura N (1980) Behavior of methylmercury in mammalian erythrocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 54: 405–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naganuma A, Urano T, Imura N (1985) A simple and rapid method for preparation of 203Hg-labeled methylmercury from 203HgCl2 and methylcobalamin. J Pharmacobiodyn 8: 69–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nagasawa H (1979) A device for milk collection from mice. Lab Anim Sci 29: 633–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Omata S, Kasama H, Hasegawa H, Hasegawa K, Ozaki K, Sugano H (1986) Species difference between rat and hamster in tissue accumulation of mercury after administration of methylmercury. Arch Toxicol 59: 249–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oskarsson A (1987) Effect of disulfiram on milk transfer and tissue distribution of lead in the neonatal rat. Toxicol Lett 36: 73–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Petersson K, Dock L, Vahter M (1989) Metabolism of methylmercury in rabbits and hamsters. Biol Trace Elem Res 21: 219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Petersson K, Dock L, Söderling K, Vahter M (1991) Distribution of mercury in rabbits subchronically exposed to low levels of radiolabeled methylmercury. Pharmacol Toxicol 68: 464–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Renshaw HW, Van Hoosier GL, Amend NK (1975) A survey of naturally occuring diseases of the Syrian hamster. Lab Anim 9: [3]: 179–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rowland IR, Robinson RD, Doherty RA, Landry TD (1983) Are developmental changes in methylmercury metabolism and excretion mediated by the intestinal microflora? In: Clarkson TW, Nordberg GF, Sager PR (eds) Reproductive and developmental toxicity of metals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 745–758Google Scholar
  29. Shi C, Lane AT, Clarkson TW (1990) Uptake of mercury by the hair of methylmercury-treated newborn mice. Environ Res 51: 170–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Skerfving S (1988) Mercury in women exposed to methylmercury through fish consumption, and in their newborn babies and breast milk. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 41: 475–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sundberg J (1992) Environmental contaminants in breast milk. Vår Föda 44: 250–254Google Scholar
  32. Sundberg J, Oskarsson A, Albanus L (1991) Methylmercury exposure during lactation: milk concentration and tissue uptake of mercury in the neonatal rat. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 46: 255–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sundberg J, Oskarsson A (1992) Placental and lactational transfer of mercury from rats exposed to methylmercury in their diet: speciation of mercury in the offspring. J Trace Elem Exp Med 5: 47–56Google Scholar
  34. Swedish Expert Group (1971) Methylmercury in fish. A toxicologicalepidemiological evaluation of risks. Nord Hyg Tidskr 4[Suppl]:19–364Google Scholar
  35. Thomas DJ, Fisher HL, Hall IL, Mushak P (1982) Effects of age and sex on retention of mercury by methyl mercury-treated rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 62: 445–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas DJ, Fisher HL, Sumler MR, Hall IL, Mushak P (1988) Distribution and retention of organic and inorganic mercury in methyl mercury-treated neonatal rats. Environ Res 47: 59–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weihe WH (1968) Der Milchleistungstest bei Versuchstieren. Z Versuchsitierk 10: 147–157Google Scholar
  38. WHO (1990) Environmental Health Criteria 101: methylmercury. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoshida M, Satoh H, Kishimoto T, Yamamura Y (1992) Exposure to mercury via breast milk in suckling offspring of maternal guinea pigs exposed to mercury vapor after parturition. J Toxicol Environ Health 35: 135–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yoshida M, Watanabe C, Satoh H, Kishimoto T, Yamamura Y (1994) Milk transfer and tissue uptake in suckling offspring after exposure of lactating maternal guinea pigs to inorganic or methylmercury. Arch Toxicol 68: 174–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Åberg B, Ekman L, Falk R, Greitz U, Persson G, Snihs J-O (1969) Metabolism of methylmercury (203Hg) compounds in man. Arch Environ Health 19: 478–484PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerstin Nordenhäll
    • 1
  • Lennart Dock
    • 1
  • Marie Vahter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Environmental MedicineKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations