Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Concentration–response evaluation of ToxCast compounds for multivariate activity patterns of neural network function

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency’s ToxCast program has generated toxicity data for thousands of chemicals but does not adequately assess potential neurotoxicity. Networks of neurons grown on microelectrode arrays (MEAs) offer an efficient approach to screen compounds for neuroactivity and distinguish between compound effects on firing, bursting, and connectivity patterns. Previously, single concentrations of the ToxCast Phase II library were screened for effects on mean firing rate (MFR) in rat primary cortical networks. Here, we expand this approach by retesting 384 of those compounds (including 222 active in the previous screen) in concentration–response across 43 network activity parameters to evaluate neural network function. Using hierarchical clustering and machine learning methods on the full suite of chemical-parameter response data, we identified 15 network activity parameters crucial in characterizing activity of 237 compounds that were response actives (“hits”). Recognized neurotoxic compounds in this network function assay were often more potent compared to other ToxCast assays. Of these chemical-parameter responses, we identified three k-means clusters of chemical-parameter activity (i.e., multivariate MEA response patterns). Next, we evaluated the MEA clusters for enrichment of chemical features using a subset of ToxPrint chemotypes, revealing chemical structural features that distinguished the MEA clusters. Finally, we assessed distribution of neurotoxicants with known pharmacology within the clusters and found that compounds segregated differentially. Collectively, these results demonstrate that multivariate MEA activity patterns can efficiently screen for diverse chemical activities relevant to neurotoxicity, and that response patterns may have predictive value related to chemical structural features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Alloisio S, Giussani V, Nobile M et al (2016) Microelectrode array (MEA) platform as a sensitive tool to detect and evaluate Ostreopsis cf. ovata toxicity. Harmful Algae 55:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2016.03.001

  2. Bader BM, Steder A, Klein AB et al (2017) Functional characterization of GABAA receptor-mediated modulation of cortical neuron network activity in microelectrode array recordings. PLoS ONE 12:e0186147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186147

  3. Bal-Price A, Crofton KM, Sachana M et al (2015) Putative adverse outcome pathways relevant to neurotoxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol 45:83–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2014.981331

  4. Bal-Price A, Lein PJ, Keil KP et al (2017) Developing and applying the adverse outcome pathway concept for understanding and predicting neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicology 59:240–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.05.010

  5. Baskar MK, Murthy PB (2018) Acute in vitro neurotoxicity of some pyrethroids using microelectrode arrays. Toxicol Vitr 47:165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2017.11.010

  6. Bradley JA, Luithardt HH, Metea MR, Strock CJ (2018) In vitro screening for seizure liability using microelectrode array technology. Toxicol Sci 163:240–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfy029

  7. Cano-Nicolau J et al (2016) Estrogenic effects of several BPA analogs in the developing zebrafish brain. Front Neurosci 10:1–14

  8. Charrad M, Ghazzali N, Boiteau V, Niknafs A (2014) An examination of indices for determining the number of clusters: NbClust Package R topics documented. J Stat Softw 61:1–36

  9. Chiappalone M, Bove M, Vato A et al (2006) Dissociated cortical networks show spontaneously correlated activity patterns during in vitro development. Brain Res 1093:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.049

  10. Colombi I, Mahajani S, Frega M et al (2013) Effects of antiepileptic drugs on hippocampal neurons coupled to micro-electrode arrays. Front Neuroeng 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2013.00010

  11. Defranchi E, Vogel S, van Ravenzwaay B et al (2011) Feasibility assessment of micro-electrode chip assay as a method of detecting neurotoxicity in vitro. Front Neuroeng 4:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2011.00006

  12. Dingemans MML, Schütte MG, Wiersma DMM et al (2016) Chronic 14-day exposure to insecticides or methylmercury modulates neuronal activity in primary rat cortical cultures. Neurotoxicology 57:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.10.002

  13. Dix DJ, Houck KA, Martin MT et al (2007) The toxcast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. Toxicol Sci 95:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfl103

  14. Filer DL (2016) tcpl: ToxCast Data Analysis Pipeline. R package version 1.2.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tcpl

  15. Filer DL, Kothiya P, Woodrow Setzer R et al (2017) Tcpl: The ToxCast pipeline for high-throughput screening data. Bioinformatics 33:618–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw680

  16. Frank E, Hall MA, Witten IH (2016) The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for "Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Fourth Edi. Morgan Kaufman

  17. Frega M, Pasquale V, Tedesco M et al (2012) Cortical cultures coupled to micro-electrode arrays: a novel approach to perform in vitro excitotoxicity testing. Neurotoxicol Teratol 34:116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2011.08.001

  18. Gong P, Hong H, Perkins EJ (2015) Ionotropic GABA receptor antagonism-induced adverse outcome pathways for potential neurotoxicity biomarkers. Biomark Med 9:1225–1239. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm.15.58

  19. Gramowski A, Jugelt K, Weiss DG, Gross GW (2004) Substance identification by quantitative characterization of oscillatory activity in murine spinal cord networks on microelectrode arrays. Eur J Neurosci 19:2815–2825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03373.x

  20. Gramowski A, Jügelt K, Stüwe S et al (2006) Functional screening of traditional antidepressants with primary cortical neuronal networks grown on multielectrode neurochips. Eur J Neurosci 24:455–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04892.x

  21. Gramowski-Voß A, Schwertle HJ, Pielka AM et al (2015) Enhancement of cortical network activity in vitro and promotion of GABAergic neurogenesis by stimulation with an electromagnetic field with a 150 MHz carrier wave pulsed with an alternating 10 and 16 Hz modulation. Front Neurol 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00158

  22. Heusinkveld HJ, Molendijk J, Van den Berg M, Westerink RHS (2013) Azole fungicides disturb intracellular Ca2+ in an additive manner in dopaminergic PC12 cells. Toxicol Sci 134:374–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kft119

  23. Hondebrink L, Verboven AHA, Drega WS et al (2016) Neurotoxicity screening of (illicit) drugs using novel methods for analysis of microelectrode array (MEA) recordings. Neurotoxicology 55:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.04.020

  24. Huang T, Wang Z, Wei L et al (2016) Microelectrode array-evaluation of neurotoxic effects of magnesium as an implantable biomaterial. J Mater Sci Technol 32:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2015.08.009

  25. Johnstone AFM, Gross GW, Weiss DG et al (2010) Microelectrode arrays: a physiologically based neurotoxicity testing platform for the 21st century. Neurotoxicology 31:331–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2010.04.001

  26. Judson RS, Houck KA, Kavlock RJ et al (2010) In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: The toxcast project. Environ Health Perspect 118:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901392

  27. Kajta M, Wójtowicz AK (2013) Impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on neural development and the onset of neurological disorders. Pharmacol. Reports 65:1632–1639

  28. Kasteel EEJ, Westerink RHS (2017) Comparison of the acute inhibitory effects of Tetrodotoxin (TTX) in rat and human neuronal networks for risk assessment purposes. Toxicol Lett 270:12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.02.014

  29. Kavlock R, Chandler K, Houck K et al (2012) Update on EPA’s ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. Chem Res Toxicol 25:1287–1302. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx3000939

  30. Keefer EW, Gramowski A, Gross GW (2001a) NMDA receptor-dependent periodic oscillations in cultured spinal cord networks. J Neurophysiol 86:3030–3042. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.6.3030

  31. Keefer EW, Gramowski A, Stenger DA et al (2001b) Characterization of acute neurotoxic effects of trimethylolpropane phosphate via neuronal network biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 16:513–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5663(01)00165-8

  32. Kolde R (2018) pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1:10

  33. Lantz SR, Mack CM, Wallace K et al (2014) Glufosinate binds N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors and increases neuronal network activity in vitro. Neurotoxicology 45:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2014.09.003

  34. Li MH (2008a) Effects of nonionic and ionic surfactants on survival, oxidative stress, and cholinesterase activity of planarian. Chemosphere 70:1796–1803

  35. Li MH (2008b) Effects of nonylphenol on cholinesterase and carboxylesterase activities in male guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Ecotoxicol. Environ Saf 71:781–786

  36. Li J, Settivari R, LeBaron MJ, Marty MS (2019) An industry perspective: a streamlined screening strategy using alternative models for chemical assessment of developmental neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicology 73:17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2019.02.010

  37. Mack CM, Lin BJ, Turner JD et al (2014) Burst and principal components analyses of MEA data for 16 chemicals describe at least three effects classes. Neurotoxicology 40:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2013.11.008

  38. Maeda E, Robinson H, Kawana A (1995) The mechanisms of generation and propagation of synchronized bursting in developing networks of cortical neurons. J Neurosci 15:6834–6845. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-10-06834.1995

  39. McConnell ER, McClain MA, Ross J et al (2012) Evaluation of multi-well microelectrode arrays for neurotoxicity screening using a chemical training set. Neurotoxicology 33:1048–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2012.05.001

  40. Meyer DA, Carter JM, Johnstone AFM, Shafer TJ (2008) Pyrethroid modulation of spontaneous neuronal excitability and neurotransmission in hippocampal neurons in culture. Neurotoxicology 29:213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2007.11.005

  41. Mohana Krishnan B, Prakhya BM (2016) In vitro evaluation of pyrethroid-mediated changes on neuronal burst parameters using microelectrode arrays. Neurotoxicology 57:270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.10.007

  42. Muramoto K, Ichikawa M, Kawahara M et al (1993) Frequency of synchronous oscillations of neuronal activity increases during development and is correlated to the number of synapses in cultured cortical neuron networks. Neurosci Lett 163:163–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(93)90372-R

  43. Narahashi T (2002) Nerve membrane ion channels as the target site of insecticides. Mini Rev Med Chem 2:419–432

  44. Nicolas J, Hendriksen PJM, van Kleef RGDM et al (2014) Detection of marine neurotoxins in food safety testing using a multielectrode array. Mol Nutr Food Res 58:2369–2378. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201400479

  45. Novellino A, Scelfo B, Palosaari T et al (2011) Development of micro-electrode array based tests for neurotoxicity: assessment of interlaboratory reproducibility with neuroactive chemicals. Front Neuroeng 4:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(72)90159-0

  46. Pancrazio JJ, Keefer EW, Ma W et al (2001) Neurophysiologic effects of chemical agent hydrolysis products on cortical neurons in vitro. Neurotoxicology 22:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-813X(01)00028-6

  47. Pancrazio JJ, Gopal K, Keefer EW, Gross GW (2014) Botulinum toxin suppression of CNS network activity in vitro. J Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/732913

  48. Pine J (2006) A history of MEA development. In: Taketani M, Baudry M (eds) Advances in network electrophysiology. Springer, pp 3–23

  49. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna

  50. Richard AM, Judson RS, Houck KA et al (2016) ToxCast chemical landscape: paving the road to 21st century toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol 29:1225–1251. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00135

  51. Sachana M, Rolaki A, Bal-Price A (2018) Development of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP): chronic binding of antagonist to N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) during brain development induces impairment of learning and memory abilities of children. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 354:153–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2018.02.024

  52. SAS Institute Inc. JMP Version 14.0. Cary, NC, 1989–2007

  53. Scelfo B, Politi M, Reniero F et al (2012) Application of multielectrode array (MEA) chips for the evaluation of mixtures neurotoxicity. Toxicology 299:172–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2012.05.020

  54. Shafer TJ, Rijal SO, Gross GW (2008) Complete inhibition of spontaneous activity in neuronal networks in vitro by deltamethrin and permethrin. Neurotoxicology 29:203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2008.01.002

  55. Strickland JD, Martin MT, Richard AM et al (2018) Screening the ToxCast phase II libraries for alterations in network function using cortical neurons grown on multi-well microelectrode array (mwMEA) plates. Arch Toxicol 92:487–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2035-5

  56. Sung D-J, Kim J-G, Won KJ et al (2012) Blockade of K and Ca2 channels by azole antifungal agents in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Biol Pharm Bull 35:1469–1475

  57. U.S. EPA (2015) ToxCast and Tox21 Summary Files from invitrodb_v2

  58. Valdivia P, Martin M, LeFew WR et al (2014) Multi-well microelectrode array recordings detect neuroactivity of ToxCast compounds. Neurotoxicology 44:204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2014.06.012

  59. Vassallo A, Chiappalone M, De Camargos LR et al (2017) A multi-laboratory evaluation of microelectrode array-based measurements of neural network activity for acute neurotoxicity testing. Neurotoxicology 60:280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2016.03.019

  60. Vidal-Liñán L, Bellas J, Salgueiro-González N, Muniategui S, Beiras R (2015) Bioaccumulation of 4-nonylphenol and effects on biomarkers, acetylcholinesterase, glutathione-S-transferase and glutathione peroxidase, in Mytilus galloprovincialis mussel gilla. Environ Pollut. 200:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.012

  61. Wallace K, Strickland JD, Valdivia P et al (2015) A multiplexed assay for determination of neurotoxicant effects on spontaneous network activity and viability from microelectrode arrays. Neurotoxicology 49:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2015.05.007

  62. Wei T, Simko V (2017) R package “corrplot”: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.84)

  63. Wheeler BC, Nam Y (2011) In vitro microelectrode array technology and neural recordings. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 39:45–61. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v39.i1.40

  64. Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York

  65. Yang C, Tarkhov A, Marusczyk J et al (2015) New publicly available chemical query language, CSRML, to support chemotype representations for application to data mining and modeling. J Chem Inf Model 55:510–528. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500667v

  66. Ylä-Outinen L, Heikkilä J, Skottman H et al (2010) Human cell-based micro electrode array platform for studying neurotoxicity. Front Neuroeng 3:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2010.00111

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the outstanding tissue culture and general laboratory support of Ms Theresa Freudenrich at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In addition, the authors thank Drs Katie Paul-Friedman and Holly Mortensen at the US EPA for their useful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL) and in part by CRADA 644-11 between the US EPA and Axion Biosystems. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [ES025128, ES030007] and the US Environmental Protection Agency [STAR R835802].

Author information

Correspondence to Timothy J. Shafer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

JDS was an employee of Axion Biosystems when the data collection for this work was conducted. Axion is a manufacturer of microelectrode array recording equipment and supplies. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Marissa B. Kosnik and Jenna D. Strickland contributed equally to this manuscript.

This document has been subjected to review by US EPA Office of Research and Development and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This work was supported in part by CRADA 644–11 between the US EPA and Axion Biosystems.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kosnik, M.B., Strickland, J.D., Marvel, S.W. et al. Concentration–response evaluation of ToxCast compounds for multivariate activity patterns of neural network function. Arch Toxicol 94, 469–484 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02636-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Neurotoxicity
  • Screening
  • ToxCast