Advertisement

Archives of Toxicology

, Volume 92, Issue 12, pp 3585–3595 | Cite as

Whole genome sequencing analysis of small and large colony mutants from the mouse lymphoma assay

  • Xiaoqing Guo
  • Bohu Pan
  • Ji-Eun Seo
  • Ying Chen
  • Jian Yan
  • Nan Mei
  • Tao Chen
Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity

Abstract

The Thymidine kinase (Tk) gene forward mutation assay, known as the mouse lymphoma assay (MLA), has been widely used for evaluating the genotoxicity of chemical agents. A striking morphological feature of Tk mutant colonies is the bimodal distribution of their sizes, with cells from the large colonies growing at a normal rate and cells from the small colonies growing at a slower rate than normal. To understand the molecular distinction for the different growth rates, we performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis of the large and small colony mutants generated from the MLA. Three large colony and three small colony mutants generated from cells treated with 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO) or the vehicle control were selected for analysis. The WGS data were analyzed for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and chromosome copy number along chromosome 11, where the Tk gene is located. Although there were LOH alterations in both large and small colony mutants, copy number changes near Tk locus were found only in small colony mutants produced by the vehicle control and 4-NQO treatments. The chromosome copy number in the regions near the Tk locus increased from two to three or four in the spontaneous small colony mutants and decreased from two to one in the 4-NQO-induced small colony mutants. These results suggest that chromosome damage was repaired differently in the large and small colony mutants, resulting in significant chromosome alterations in the small colony mutants, but not in the large colony mutants. Thus, chromosome alterations near the Tk locus may play a major role in the inhibition of cell growth in the Tk small colony mutants.

Keywords

Whole genome sequencing Mouse lymphoma assay Chromosome copy number variation Loss of heterozygosity DNA damage Small colony Tk mutants Large colony Tk mutants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

BP and JES were supported by appointments to the Postgraduate Research Program at the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR) administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There was no conflict of interest declared.

Supplementary material

204_2018_2318_MOESM1_ESM.docx (587 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 587 KB)

References

  1. Amisten S, Mohammad Al-Amily I, Soni A, Hawkes R, Atanes P, Persaud SJ, Rorsman P, Salehi A (2017) Anti-diabetic action of all-trans retinoic acid and the orphan G protein coupled receptor GPRC5C in pancreatic beta-cells. Endocr J 64(3):325–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Applegate ML, Moore MM, Broder CB, Burrell A, Juhn G, Kasweck KL, Lin PF, Wadhams A, Hozier JC (1990) Molecular dissection of mutations at the heterozygous thymidine kinase locus in mouse lymphoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87(1):51–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Belkadi A, Bolze A, Itan Y, Cobat A, Vincent QB, Antipenko A, Shang L, Boisson B, Casanova JL, Abel L (2015) Whole-genome sequencing is more powerful than whole-exome sequencing for detecting exome variants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(17):5473–5478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beroukhim R, Lin M, Park Y, Hao K, Zhao X, Garraway LA, Fox EA, Hochberg EP, Mellinghoff IK, Hofer MD, Descazeaud A, Rubin MA, Meyerson M, Wong WH, Sellers WR, Li C (2006) Inferring loss-of-heterozygosity from unpaired tumors using high-density oligonucleotide SNP arrays. PLoS Comput Biol 2(5):e41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop AJ, Schiestl RH (2001) Homologous recombination as a mechanism of carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1471(3):M109–M121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blazak WF, Los FJ, Rudd CJ, Caspary WJ (1989) Chromosome analysis of small and large L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell colonies: comparison of trifluorothymidine-resistant and unselected cell colonies from mutagen-treated and control cultures. Mutat Res 224(2):197–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boeva V, Zinovyev A, Bleakley K, Vert JP, Janoueix-Lerosey I, Delattre O, Barillot E (2011) Control-free calling of copy number alterations in deep-sequencing data using GC-content normalization. Bioinformatics 27(2):268–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boeva V, Popova T, Bleakley K, Chiche P, Cappo J, Schleiermacher G, Janoueix-Lerosey I, Delattre O, Barillot E (2012) Control-FREEC: a tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28(3):423–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen T, Moore MM (2004) Screening for chemical mutagens using the mouse lymphoma assay. In: Yan ZaC GW (eds.), (ed) Optimization in drug discovery: in-vitro methods. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 337–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen T, Harrington-Brock K, Moore MM (2002a) Mutant frequencies and loss of heterozygosity induced by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in the Thymidine kinase gene of L5178Y/Tk +/–-3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 17(2):105–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen T, Harrington-Brock K, Moore MM (2002b) Mutant frequency and mutational spectra in the Tk and Hprt genes of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-treated mouse lymphoma cellsdagger. Environ Mol Mutagen 39(4):296–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark LS, Harrington-Brock K, Wang J, Sargent L, Lowry D, Reynolds SH, Moore MM (2004) Loss of P53 heterozygosity is not responsible for the small colony thymidine kinase mutant phenotype in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 19(4):263–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clive D, Johnson KO, Spector JF, Batson AG, Brown MM (1979) Validation and characterization of the L5178Y/TK+/- mouse lymphoma mutagen assay system. Mutat Res 59(1):61–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies MJ, Phillips BJ, Rumsby PC (1993) Molecular analysis of mutations at the tk locus of L5178Y mouse-lymphoma cells induced by ethyl methanesulphonate and mitomycin C. Mutat Res 290(2):145–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. de Clare M, Oliver SG (2013) Copy-number variation of cancer-gene orthologs is sufficient to induce cancer-like symptoms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Biol 11:24CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Du H, Pan B, Chen T (2017) Evaluation of chemical mutagenicity using next generation sequencing: a review. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 35(3):140–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. el-Tarras A, Dubins JS, Warner J, Hoffman C, Cobb RR (1995) Molecular analysis of the TK locus in L5178Y large and small colony mouse lymphoma cell mutants induced by hycanthone methanesulfonate. Mutat Res 332(1–2):89–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW (2006) Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 7(2):85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman JL, Perry GH, Feuk L, Redon R, McCarroll SA, Altshuler DM, Aburatani H, Jones KW, Tyler-Smith C, Hurles ME, Carter NP, Scherer SW, Lee C (2006) Copy number variation: new insights in genome diversity. Genome Res 16(8):949–961CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamazon ER, Stranger BE (2015) The impact of human copy number variation on gene expression. Brief Funct Genomics 14(5):352–357CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo X, Verkler TL, Chen Y, Richter PA, Polzin GM, Moore MM, Mei N (2011) Mutagenicity of 11 cigarette smoke condensates in two versions of the mouse lymphoma assay. Mutagenesis 26(2):273–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo X, Mittelstaedt RA, Guo L, Shaddock JG, Heflich RH, Bigger AH, Moore MM, Mei N (2013) Nitroxide TEMPO: a genotoxic and oxidative stress inducer in cultured cells. Toxicol In Vitro 27(5):1496–1502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Guo X, Heflich RH, Dial SL, Richter PA, Moore MM, Mei N (2016) Quantitative analysis of the relative mutagenicity of five chemical constituents of tobacco smoke in the mouse lymphoma assay. Mutagenesis 31(3):287–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Han T, Wang J, Tong W, Moore MM, Fuscoe JC, Chen T (2006) Microarray analysis distinguishes differential gene expression patterns from large and small colony Thymidine kinase mutants of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. BMC Bioinformatics 7(Suppl 2):S9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrington-Brock K, Collard DD, Chen T (2003) Bromate induces loss of heterozygosity in the Thymidine kinase gene of L5178Y/Tk+/–-3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells. Mutat Res 537(1):21–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Honma M (2005) Generation of loss of heterozygosity and its dependency on p53 status in human lymphoblastoid cells. Environ Mol Mutagen 45(2–3):162–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Honma M, Momose M, Sakamoto H, Sofuni T, Hayashi M (2001) Spindle poisons induce allelic loss in mouse lymphoma cells through mitotic non-disjunction. Mutat Res 493(1–2):101–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hozier J, Sawyer J, Moore M, Howard B, Clive D (1981) Cytogenetic analysis of the L5178Y/TK+/− leads to TK−/− mouse lymphoma mutagenesis assay system. Mutat Res 84(1):169–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Joshi NA, Fass JN (2011) Sickle: a sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33) [Software]. https://github.com/najoshi/sickle. Accessed 8/6/2018
  30. Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754–1760CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Li W, Olivier M (2013) Current analysis platforms and methods for detecting copy number variation. Physiol Genomics 45(1):1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing S (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078–2079CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Liechty MC, Scalzi JM, Sims KR, Crosby H Jr, Spencer DL, Davis LM, Caspary WJ, Hozier JC (1998) Analysis of large and small colony L5178Y tk−/− mouse lymphoma mutants by loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and by whole chromosome 11 painting: detection of recombination. Mutagenesis 13(5):461–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mei N, Guo X, Moore MM (2014) Methods for Using the Mouse Lymphoma Assay to Screen for Chemical Mutagenicity and Photo-Mutagenicity. In: Caldwell GW, Yan Z (eds) Optimization in drug discovery: in-vitro methods, pp 561–592Google Scholar
  35. Mishra S, Whetstine JR (2016) Different facets of copy number changes: permanent, transient, and adaptive. Mol Cell Biol 36(7):1050–1063CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Moore MM, Clive D, Hozier JC, Howard BE, Batson AG, Turner NT, Sawyer J (1985) Analysis of trifluorothymidine-resistant (TFTr) mutants of L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma cells. Mutat Res 151(1):161–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore-Brown MM, Clive D, Howard BE, Batson AG, Johnson KO (1981) The utilization of trifluorothymidine (TFT) to select for thymidine kinase-deficient (TK−/−) mutants from L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma cells. Mutat Res 85(5):363–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Murthy SK, DiFrancesco LM, Ogilvie RT, Demetrick DJ (2002) Loss of heterozygosity associated with uniparental disomy in breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol 15(12):1241–1250CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD (2015) Test No. 490: In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene. https://www.oecd-ilibraryorg/environment/test-no-490-in-vitro-mammalian-cell-gene-mutation-tests-using-the-thymidine-kinase-gene_9789264264908-en. Accessed 8 June 2018
  40. Popova T, Manie E, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Rigaill G, Barillot E, Stern MH (2009) Genome Alteration Print (GAP): a tool to visualize and mine complex cancer genomic profiles obtained by SNP arrays. Genome Biol 10(11):R128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Tang YC, Amon A (2013) Gene copy-number alterations: a cost-benefit analysis. Cell 152(3):394–405CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, Jordan T, Shakir K, Roazen D, Thibault J, Banks E, Garimella KV, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, DePristo MA (2013) From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 43:11 10 11–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang J, Chen T, Honma M, Chen L, Moore MM (2007) 3′-azido-3′-deoxythymidine induces deletions in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Environ Mol Mutagen 48(3–4):248–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang J, Sawyer JR, Chen L, Chen T, Honma M, Mei N, Moore MM (2009) The mouse lymphoma assay detects recombination, deletion, and aneuploidy. Toxicol Sci 109(1):96–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoqing Guo
    • 1
  • Bohu Pan
    • 2
  • Ji-Eun Seo
    • 1
  • Ying Chen
    • 1
  • Jian Yan
    • 1
  • Nan Mei
    • 1
  • Tao Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Genetic and Molecular ToxicologyNational Center for Toxicological ResearchJeffersonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Bioinformatics and BiostatisticsNational Center for Toxicological ResearchJeffersonUSA

Personalised recommendations