The in vitro PIG-A gene mutation assay: glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-related genotype-to-phenotype relationship in TK6 cells
- 522 Downloads
In our previous work, we established an in vitro variant of the currently developed in vivo PIG-A assay as promising mutagenicity test system. We applied the human B-lymphoblastoid cell line TK6 for the in vitro assay development, which is based on the cellular glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) status. At least 22 genes are involved in GPI biosynthesis, leading to the complex situation that, in principle, multiple genes could induce a GPI-deficient phenotype by acquiring inactivating mutations. However, only the PIG-A gene is located on the X-chromosome, rendering PIG-A more sensitive compared to autosomal linked, GPI-relevant genes. In this work, we investigated the GPI-related genotype-to-phenotype relationship in TK6 cells. By a next-generation sequencing approach, we identified a heterozygous chromosomal deletion on chromosome 17, where the PIG-L gene is located. In the analyzed TK6 cell clones, the GPI-deficient phenotype was induced either by mutations in PIG-A, by the complete absence of PIG-A mRNA, or by deletions in the remaining functional PIG-L gene, causing loss of heterozygosity. The identified PIG-L heterozygosity could also be responsible for the increased sensitivity toward mutagenic ethyl methanesulfonate or UV-C treatments of p53-proficient TK6 compared to the TK6-related, but p53-deficient WI-L2-NS cell line. Moreover, the WI-L2-NS cell line was found to exhibit a much lower number of GPI-deficient mutant cells in the purchased cell batch, and WI-L2-NS exerted a lower spontaneous rate of GPI deficiency compared to TK6 cells.
KeywordsTK6 PIG-A PIG-L GPI biosynthesis In vitro mutation assay Next-generation sequencing
This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Excellence Initiative KIT and INST 121384/24-1 FUGG).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Batt SM, Jabeen T, Mishra AK, Veerapen N, Krumbach K, Eggeling L, Besra GS, Fütterer K (2010) Acceptor substrate discrimination in phosphatidyl-myo-inositol mannoside synthesis: structural and mutational analysis of mannosyltransferase Corynebacterium glutamicum PimB. J Biol Chem 285(48):37741–37752CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hillmen P, Bessler M, Mason PJ, Watkins WM, Luzzatto L (1993) Specific defect in N-acetylglucosamine incorporation in the biosynthesis of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor in cloned cell lines from patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90(11):5272–5276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Miura D, Dobrovolsky VN, Mittelstaedt RA, Kasahara Y, Katsuura Y, Heflich RH (2008) Development of an In vivo gene mutation assay using the endogenous Pig-A gene: II. Selection of Pig-A mutant rat spleen T-cells with proaerolysin and sequencing Pig-A cDNA from the mutants. Environ Mol Mutagen 49(8):622–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- NCBI (2015) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NM_002641.3