Characterization of formaldehyde’s genotoxic mode of action by gene expression analysis in TK6 cells
- 560 Downloads
Gene expression analysis has been established as a tool for the characterization of genotoxic mechanisms of chemical mutagens. It has been suggested that expression analysis is capable of distinguishing compounds that cause DNA damage from those that interfere with mitotic spindle function. Formaldehyde (FA) is known to be a DNA-reactive substance which mainly induces chromosomal damage in cultured mammalian cells. However, there has been concern that FA might also induce leukemia-specific aneuploidies, although recent cytogenetic studies excluded a relevant aneugenic potential of FA. We now investigated whether gene expression profiling can be used as a molecular tool to further characterize FA’s genotoxic mode of action and to differentiate between clastogenic and aneugenic activity. TK6 cells were exposed to FA for 4 and 24 h, and changes in gene expression were analyzed using a whole-genome human microarray. Results were compared to the expression profiles of two DNA-damaging clastogens (methyl methanesulfonate and ethyl methanesulfonate) and two aneugens (colcemid and vincristine). The genotoxic activity of FA, MMS and EMS under these conditions was confirmed by comet assay experiments. The gene expression profiles indicated that clastogens and aneugens induce discriminable gene expression patterns. Exposure of TK6 cells to FA led to a discrete gene expression pattern, and all toxicogenomics analyses revealed a closer relationship of FA with clastogens than with aneugens.
KeywordsFormaldehyde Mutagenic potential Clastogen Aneugen Microarray analysis
The financial support by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the views in this paper are those of the authors they have no conflict of interest in presenting their opinions.
- Casanova M, Morgan KT, Steinhagen WH, Everitt JI, Popp JA, Heck HD (1991) Covalent binding of inhaled formaldehyde to DNA in the respiratory tract of rhesus monkeys: pharmacokinetics, rat-to-monkey interspecies scaling, and extrapolation to man. Fundam Appl Toxicol 17:409–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H, Fostel JM, Aruga C, Bauer D, Boitier E, Deng S, Dickinson D, Le Fevre AC, Fornace A Jr, Grenet O, Gu Y, Hoflack JC, Shiiyama M, Smith R, Snyder RD, Spire C, Tanaka G, Aubrecht J (2009) Characterization and interlaboratory comparison of a gene expression signature for differentiating genotoxic mechanisms. Toxicol Sci 110:341–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenwood SK, Hill R, Sun J, Armstrong MJ, Johnson TE, Gara JP, Galloway SM (2004) Population doubling: a simple and more accurate estimation of cell growth suppression in the in vitro assay for chromosomal aberrations that reduces irrelevant positive results. Environ Mol Mutagen 43:36–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) (2012) Chemical agents and related occupations. Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 100F:401–435Google Scholar
- Mathijs K, Brauers KJ, Jennen DG, Boorsma A, van Herwijnen MH, Gottschalk RW, Kleinjans JC, van Delft JH (2009) Discrimination for genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling in primary mouse hepatocytes improves with exposure time. Toxicol Sci 112:374–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Tang X, Rothman N, Vermeulen R, Ji Z, Shen M, Qiu C, Guo W, Liu S, Reiss B, Freeman LB, Ge Y, Hubbard AE, Hua M, Blair A, Galvan N, Ruan X, Alter BP, Xin KX, Li S, Moore LE, Kim S, Xie Y, Hayes RB, Azuma M, Hauptmann M, Xiong J, Stewart P, Li L, Rappaport SM, Huang H, Fraumeni JF Jr, Smith MT, Lan Q (2010) Occupational exposure to formaldehyde, hematotoxicity, and leukemia-specific chromosome changes in cultured myeloid progenitor cells. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:80–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar