Advertisement

Archives of Toxicology

, Volume 87, Issue 7, pp 1219–1230 | Cite as

Comparison of toxicity between the different-type TiO2 nanowires in vivo and in vitro

  • Eun-Jung Park
  • Hyun-Woo Shim
  • Gwang-Hee Lee
  • Jae-Ho Kim
  • Dong-Wan Kim
Inorganic Compounds

Abstract

In this study, we compared their toxicity in vivo and in vitro based on the physicochemical properties of three different types of TiO2 nanowires, H2Ti3O7 nanowires (1HTO), hydrothermal treatment (2HTO), and calcination (3HTO) of 1HTO. The surface of 1HTO was smooth, and the surface of 2HTO was much rougher. The negative charge on the surface increased in the order of 2HTO, 3HTO, and 1HTO, whereas the surface area increased in the order of 3HTO, 1HTO, and 2HTO. The lung is a main exposure route of nanoparticles. On day 28 after a single instillation (1 mg/kg), three nanowires induced a Th2-type inflammatory response together with the relative increase in CD4+ T cells, especially by 2HTO. In vitro, three TiO2 nanowires (10 μg/ml) commonly induced the generation of cell debris in eight cell lines which may be the potential target organ of nanoparticles, especially by 2HTO. It seemed that the generation of cell debris coincides with the increase in autophagosome-like vacuoles in the cytosol. In further study using BEAS-2B cells originated from the lung, the protein amount from cells exposed to 2HTO decreased more clearly although the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was less compared to 1HTO and 3HTO. Based on these results, we suggest that surface area may act as an important factor depends on the biological response by TiO2 nanowires. Furthermore, the increase in autophagosome-like vacuoles may be an important cause of cell death by nanoparticles with ROS.

Keywords

Titanium Nanowires Toxicity Autophagosome Surface area Vacuoles 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011-35B-E00011, NRF-2011-0030745).

Supplementary material

204_2013_1019_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)
204_2013_1019_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 1496 kb)

References

  1. Ai J, Biazar E, Jafarpour M, Montazeri M, Majdi A, Aminifard S et al (2011) Nanotoxicology and nanoparticle safety in biomedical designs. Int J Nanomedicine 6:1117–1127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aillon KL, Xie Y, El-Gendy N, Berkland CJ, Forrest ML (2009) Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:457–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andón FT, Fadeel B. (2012) Programmed Cell Death: Molecular Mechanisms and Implications for Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials. Acc Chem Res Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen X, Mao SS (2007) Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev 107:2891–2959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Degterev A, Yuan J (2008) Expansion and evolution of cell death programmes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(5):378–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Donaldson K, Tran CL (2004) An introduction to the short-term toxicology of respirable industrial fibres. Mut Res 553:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donaldson K, Murphy F, Schinwald A, Duffin R, Poland CA (2011) Identifying the pulmonary hazard of high aspect ration nanoparticles to enable their safety-by-design. Nanomedicine (Lond) 6:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fadeel B, Garcia-Bennett AE (2010) Better safe than sorry: understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles manufactured for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62:362–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galluzzi L, Kroemer G (2008) Necroptosis: a specialized pathway of programmed necrosis. Cell 135(7):1161–1163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gustafsson AB, Gottlieb RA (2008) Recycle or die: the role of autophagy in cardioprotection. J Mol Cell Cardiol 44(4):654–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton RF, Wu N, Porter D, Buford M, Wolfarth M, Holian A (2009) Particle length-dependent titanium dioxide nanomaterials toxicity and bioactivity. Part Fiber Toxicol 6:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris J (2011) Autophagy and cytokines. Cytokine 56(2):140–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henics T, Wheatley DN (1999) Cytoplasmic vacuolation, adaptation and cell death: a view on new perspectives and features. Biol Cell 91(7):485–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horie M, Nishio K, Fujita K, Kato H, Endoh S, Suzuki M et al (2010) Cellular responses by stable and uniform ultrafine titanium dioxide particles in culture-medium dispersions when secondary particle size was 100 nm or less. Toxicol In Vitro 24:1629–1638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsiao IL, Huang YJ (2011) Effects of various physicochemical characteristics on the toxicities of ZnO and TiO nanoparticles toward human lung epithelial cells. Sci Total Environ 409:1219–1228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2010) IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. 93Google Scholar
  17. Jin C, Tang Y, Yang FG, Li XL, Xu S, Fan XY et al (2011) Cellular toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles in anatase and rutile crystal phase. Biol Trace Elem Res 141:3–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston HJ, Hutchison GR, Christensen FM, Peters S, Hankin S, Aschberger K et al (2010) A critical review of the biological mechanisms underlying the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of carbon nanotubes: the contribution of physic-chemical characteristics. Nanotoxicology 4:207–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karlsson HL, Gustafsson J, Cronholm P, Moller L (2009) Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles—a comparison between nano- and micrometer size. Toxicol Lett 188:112–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kobayashi K (2009) Targeting the hippocampal mossy fiber synapse for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Mol Neurobiol 39:24–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kroemer G, Levine B (2008) Autophagic cell death: the story of a misnomer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(12):1004–1010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar V, Kumari A, Guleria P, Yadav SK (2012) Evaluating the toxicity of selected types of nanochemicals. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 215:39–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee DK, Cho IS, Lee SW, Kim DH, Shim HW, Kim DW, Hong KS. (2010) Low-temperature synthesis of phase-pure0D-1D BaTiO3 nanostructures using H2Ti3O7 templates. Euro J Inorg Chem 1343–1347Google Scholar
  24. Madl AK, Pinkerton KE (2009) Health effects of inhaled engineered and incidental nanoparticles. Crit Rev Toxicol 39:629–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Magrez A, Horvath L, Smajda R, Salicio V, Pasquier N, Forro L et al (2009) Cellular toxicity of TiO2-based nanofilaments. ACS Nano 3:2274–2280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meissner T, Potthoff A, Richter V (2009) Physico-chemical characterization in the light of toxicological effects. Inhal Toxicol 21(Suppl 1):35–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moolgavkar SH, Brown RC, Turim J (2001) Biopersistence, fiber length, and cancer risk assessment for inhaled fibers. Inhal Toxicol 13:755–772PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oh WK, Kim S, Choi M, Kim C, Jeong YS, Cho BR et al (2010) Cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and innate immune response of silica-titania hollow nanoparticles based on size and surface functionality. ACS Nano 4:5301–5313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Park EJ, Yi J, Chung KH, Ryu DY, Choi J, Park K (2008) Oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles in cultured BEAS-2B cells. Toxicol Lett 180:222–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sanchez VC, Pietruska JR, Miselis NR, Hurt RH, Kane AB (2009) Biopersistence and potential adverse health impacts of fibrous nanomaterials: what have we learned from asbestos? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1:511–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schanen BC, Karakoti AS, Seal S, Drake DR 3rd, Warren WL, Self WT (2009) Exposure to titanium dioxide nanomaterials provokes inflammation of an in vitro human immune construct. ACS Nano 3:2523–2532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmid D, Münz C (2007) Innate and adaptive immunity through autophagy. Immunity 27(1):11–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwartz LM, Smith SW, Jones ME, Osborne BA (1993) Do all programmed cell deaths occur via apoptosis? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90(3):980–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shukla RK, Kumar A, Pandey AK, Singh SS, Dhawan A (2011) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis in human keratinocyte cells. J Biomed Nanotechnol 7:100–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh S, Nalwa HS (2007) Nanotechnology and health safety—toxicity and risk assessments of nanostructured materials on human health. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:3048–3070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teow Y, Asharani PV, Hande MP, Valiyaveettil S (2011) Health impact and safety of engineered nanomaterials. Chem Commun (Camb) 47:7025–7038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang JX, Fan YB, Gao Y, Hu QH, Wang TC (2009) TiO2 nanoparticles translocation and potential toxicological effect in rats after intraarticular injection. Biomaterials 30:4590–4600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Warheit DB, Webb TR, Sayes CM, Colvin VL, Reed KL (2006) Pulmonary instillation studies with nanoscale TiO2 rods and dots in rats: toxicity is not dependent upon particle size and surface area. Toxicol Sci 91:227–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu J, Sun J, Xue Y (2010) Involvement of JNK and p53 activation in G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles in neuron cells. Toxicol Lett 199:269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu W, Liu P, Li J (2012) Necroptosis: an emerging form of programmed cell death. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 82(3):249–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ (2005) Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating. Cell Death Differ 12:1542–1552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang S, Chen Q, Peng LM (2005) Structure and formation of H2Ti3O7 nanotubes in an alkali environment. Phys Rev B 71:014104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eun-Jung Park
    • 1
  • Hyun-Woo Shim
    • 2
  • Gwang-Hee Lee
    • 2
  • Jae-Ho Kim
    • 1
  • Dong-Wan Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Science and TechnologyAjou UniversitySuwonKorea
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringAjou UniversitySuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations