Pharmacokinetics explain in vivo/in vitro discrepancies of carcinogen-induced gene expression alterations in rat liver and cultivated hepatocytes
- 647 Downloads
Cultivated hepatocytes represent a well-established in vitro system. However, the applicability of hepatocytes in toxicogenomics is still controversially discussed. Recently, an in vivo/in vitro discrepancy has been described, whereby the non-genotoxic rat liver carcinogen methapyrilene alters the expression of the metabolizing genes SULT1A1 and ABAT, as well as the DNA damage response gene GADD34 in vitro, but not in vivo. If the collagen sandwich cultures of hepatocytes really produce false-positive data, this would compromise its application in toxicogenomics. To revisit the putative in vivo/in vitro discrepancy, we first analyzed and modeled methapyrilene concentrations in the portal vein of rats. The relatively short half-life of 2.8 h implies a rapid decrease in orally administered methapyrilene in vivo below concentrations that can cause gene expression alterations. This corresponded to the time-dependent alteration levels of GADD34, ABAT and SULT1A1 RNA in the liver: RNA levels are altered 1, 6 and 12 h after methapyrilene administration, but return to control levels after 24 and 72 h. In contrast, methapyrilene concentrations in the culture medium supernatant of primary rat hepatocyte cultures decreased slowly. This explains why GADD34, ABAT and SULT1A1 were still deregulated after 24 h exposure in vitro, but not in vivo. It should also be considered that the earliest analyzed time point in the previous in vivo studies was 24 h after methapyrilene administration. In conclusion, previously observed in vitro/in vivo discrepancy can be explained by different pharmacokinetics present in vitro and in vivo. When the in vivo half-life is short, levels of some initially altered genes may have returned to control levels already 24 h after administration.
KeywordsHepatocyte in vitro system Alternative methods In vitro/in vivo comparison Genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens In vitro pharmacokinetics
Growth arrest and DNA damage inducible gene 34
Multi drug resistance protein 1NQO1: NADPH-quinone oxidoreductase
This study was supported by the SEURAT-1 projects NOTOX (EU-Project FP 7-Health- Grant Agreement No. 267038) and DETECTIVE (EU-Project FP 7-Health-Grant Agreement No. 266838) and by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; Förderkennzeichen 0313854).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bauer A, Schumann A, Gilbert M, Wilhelm C, Hengstler JG, Schiller J, Fuchs B (2009) Evaluation of carbon tetrachloride-induced stress on rat hepatocytes by 31P NMR and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: lysophosphatidylcholine generation from unsaturated phosphatidylcholines. Chem Phys Lipids 159(1):21–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beekmann JM, Boess F, Hildebrand H, Kalkuhl A, Suter L (2006) Gene Expression analysis of the hepatotoxicant methapyrilene in primary rat hepatocytes: an interlaboratory study. Environ Health Perspect 114(1):92–99Google Scholar
- Boess F, Kamber M, Romer S, Gasser R, Muller D, Albertini S, Suter L (2003) Gene expression in two hepatic cell lines, cultured primary hepatocytes, and liver slices compared to the in vivo liver gene expression in rats: possible implications for toxicogenomics use of in vitro systems. Toxicol Sci 73(2):386–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Godoy P, Hengstler JG, Ilkavets I, Meyer C, Bachmann A, Müller A, Tuschl G, Mueller SO, Dooley S (2009) Extracellular matrix modulates sensitivity of hepatocytes to fibroblastoid dedifferentiation and transforming growth factor beta-induced apoptosis. Hepatology 49(6):2031–2043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Godoy P, Lakkapamu S, Schug M, Bauer A, Stewart JD, Bedawi E, Hammad S, Amin J, Marchan R, Schormann W, Maccoux L, von Recklinghausen I, Reif R, Hengstler JG (2010b) Dexamethasone-dependent versus -independent markers of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in primary hepatocytes. Biol Chem 391(1):73–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heise T, Schug M, Storm D, Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H, Ahr HJ, Hellwig B, Rahnenfuhrer J, Ghallab A, Guenther G, Sisnaiske J, Reif R, Godoy P, Mielke H, Gundert-Remy U, Lampen A, Oberemm A, Hengstler JG (2012) In vitro–in vivo correlation of gene expression alterations induced by liver carcinogens. Curr Med Chem 19(11):1721–1730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hengstler JG, Utesch D, Steinberg P, Platt KL, Diener B, Ringel M, Swales N, Fischer T, Biefang K, Gerl M, Böttger T, Oesch F (2000) Cryopreserved primary hepatocytes as a constantly available in vitro model for the evaluation of human and animal drug metabolism and enzyme induction. Drug Metab Rev 32:81–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt NJ, Lechón MJG, Houston JB, Hallifax D, Brown HS, Maurel P, Kenna JG, Gustavsson L, Lohmann C, Skonberg C, Guillouzo A, Tuschl G, Li AP, LeCluyse E, Groothuis GMM, Hengstler JG (2007) Primary hepatocytes: current understanding of the regulation of metabolic enzymes and transporter proteins, and pharmaceutical practice for the use of hepatocytes in metabolism, enzyme induction, transporter, clearance, and hepatotoxicity studies. Drug Metab Rev 39:159–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kienhuis AS, van de Poll MCG, Wortelboer H, van Herwijnen M, Gottschalk R, Dejong CHC, Boorsma A, Paules RS, Kleinjans JCS, Stierum RH, van Delft JHM (2009) Parallelogram approach using rat-human in vitro and rat in vivo toxicogenomics predicts acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in humans. Toxicol Sci 107(2):544–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mathijs K, Brauers KJJ, Jennen DGJ, Boorsma A, van Herwijnen MHM, Gottschalk RWH, Kleinjans JCS, van Delft JHM (2009) Discrimination for genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling in primary mouse hepatocytes improves with exposure time. Toxicol Sci 112(2):374–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schug M, Heise T, Bauer A, Storm D, Blaszkewicz M, Bedawy E, Brulport M, Geppert B, Hermes M, Föllmann W, Rapp K, Maccoux L, Schormann W, Appel KE, Oberemm A, Gundert-Remy U, Hengstler JG (2008) Primary rat hepatocytes as in vitro system for gene expression studies: comparison of sandwich, Matrigel and 2D cultures. Arch Toxicol 82(12):923–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Uehara T, Minowa Y, Morikawa Y, Kondo C, Maruyama T, Kato I, Nakatsu N, Igarashi Y, Ono A, Hayashi H, Mitsumori K, Yamada H, Ohno Y, Urushidani T (2011) Prediction model of potential hepatocarcinogenicity of rat hepatocarcinogens using a large-scale toxicogenomics database. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 255:297–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Kesteren PC, Zwart PE, Pennings JL, Gottschalk WH, Kleinjans JC, van Delft JH, van Steeg H, Luijten M (2011) Deregulation of cancer-related pathways in primary hepatocytes derived from DNA repair-deficient Xpa-/-p53 ± mice upon exposure to benzo[a]pyrene. Toxicol Sci 123(1):123–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zellmer S, Schmidt-Heck W, Godoy P, Wenig H, Meyer C, Lehmann T, Sparna T, Schormann W, Hammad S, Kreutz C, Timmer J, von Weizsäcker F, Thürmann PA, Merfort I, Guthke R, Dooley S, Hengstler JG, Gebhardt R (2010) Transcription factors ETF, E2F, and SP-1 are involved in cytokine-independent proliferation of murine hepatocytes. Hepatology 52:2127–2136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar