Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 199, Issue 3, pp 445–455 | Cite as

Evidence of mercury trapping in biofilm-EPS and mer operon-based volatilization of inorganic mercury in a marine bacterium Bacillus cereus BW-201B

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
  • 278 Downloads

Abstract

Biofilm-forming mercury-resistant marine bacterium Bacillus cereus BW-201B has been explored to evident that the bacterial biofilm-EPS (exopolymers) trap inorganic mercury but subsequently release EPS-bound mercury for induction of mer operon-mediated volatilization of inorganic mercury. The isolate was able to tolerate 50 ppm of mercury and forms biofilm in presence of mercury. mer operon-mediated volatilization was confirmed, and –SH was found to be the key functional group of bacterial EPS responsible for mercury binding. Biofilm-EPS-bound mercury was found to be internalized to the bacterial system as confirmed by reversible conformational change of –SH group and increased expression level of merA gene in a timescale experiment. Biofilm-EPS trapped Hg after 24 h of incubation, and by 96 h, the volatilization process reaches to its optimum confirming the internalization of EPS-bound mercury to the bacterial cells. Biofilm disintegration at the same time corroborates the results.

Keywords

Mercury-resistant marine bacteria Biofilm EPS merA Biofilm architecture Bioavailability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the authorities of NIT, Rourkela, for providing facilities. S.D. thanks the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India for a research Grant (No. BT/PR7480/BCE/8/945/2012).

Supplementary material

203_2016_1317_MOESM1_ESM.doc (94 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 93 kb)

References

  1. Abdelatey LM, Khalil WK, Ali TH, Mahrous KF (2011) Heavy metal resistance and gene expression analysis of metal resistance genes in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria present in Egyptian soils. J Appl Sci Environ Sanit 6:201–211Google Scholar
  2. Allison DG (2003) The biofilm matrix. Biofouling 19:139–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Asahara A, Nakajima M, Fukaya R, Tokoro H, Ohkoshi SI, Suemoto T (2012) Ultrafast dynamics of reversible photoinduced phase transitions in rubidium manganese hexacyanoferrate investigated by midinfrared CN vibration spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 86:195138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkay T, Miller SM, Summers AO (2003) Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:355–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyer PD (1959) Sulfhydryl and disulfide groups of enzymes. Enzymes 1:511–588Google Scholar
  6. Bura R, Cheung M, Liao B, Finlayson J, Lee BC, Droppo IG, Liss SN (1998) Composition of extracellular polymeric substances in the activated sludge floc matrix. Water Sci Technol 37:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cappuccino J, Sherman N (2013) Microbiology: a laboratory manual. Pearson/Benjamin Cummings, Dorling Kindersley, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty J, Das S (2014) Characterization and cadmium-resistant gene expression of biofilm-forming marine bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa JP-11. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:14188–14201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakraborty J, Das S (2016) Characterization of the metabolic pathway and catabolic gene expression in biphenyl degrading marine bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa JP-11. Chemosphere 144:1706–1714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards (2006) Institute methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, Approved Standard M7-A7, 7th edn. CLSI, WayneGoogle Scholar
  11. Dash HR, Das S (2012) Bioremediation of mercury and the importance of bacterial mer genes. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 75:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dash HR, Das S (2014) Assessment of mercury pollution through mercury resistant marine bacteria in Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, Odisha, India. Indian J Geo-Mar Sci 43:1103–1115Google Scholar
  13. Dash HR, Mangwani N, Chakraborty J, Kumari S, Das S (2013) Marine bacteria: potential candidates for enhanced bioremediation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:561–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dash HR, Mangwani N, Das S (2014) Characterization and potential application in mercury bioremediation of highly mercury-resistant marine bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis PW-05. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:2642–2653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies D (2003) Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:114–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De Souza MJ, Nair S, Bharathi PL, Chandramohan D (2006) Metal and antibiotic-resistance in psychrotrophic bacteria from Antarctic Marine waters. Ecotoxicology 15:379–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Deng X, Wang P (2012) Isolation of marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury and their bioaccumulation process. Bioresour Technol 121:342–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fang HHP, Xu LC, Chan KY (2002) Effects of toxic metals and chemicals on biofilm and biocorrosion. Water Res 36:4709–4716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Faust B (1997) Modern chemical techniques: An essential reference for students and teachers. Royal Society of Chemistry. ISBN 9780854042869Google Scholar
  20. Flemming HC, Neu TR, Wozniak DJ (2007) The EPS matrix: the “house of biofilm cells”. J Bacteriol 189:7945–7947CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evol 39:783–791Google Scholar
  22. Hancock V, Dahl M, Klemm P (2010) Abolition of biofilm formation in urinary tract Escherichia coli and Klebsiella isolates by metal interference through competition for Fur. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3836–3841CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison JJ, Ceri H, Yerly J, Stremick CA, Hu Y, Martinuzzi R, Turner RJ (2006) The use of microscopy and three-dimensional visualization to evaluate the structure of microbial biofilms cultivated in the Calgary Biofilm Device. Biol Proced Online 8:194–215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison JJ, Ceri H, Turner RJ (2007) Multimetal resistance and tolerance in microbial biofilms. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:928–938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Ersbøll BK, Molin S (2000) Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 146:2395–2407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Høiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, Molin S, Ciofu O (2010) Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 35:322–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong Z, Chen W, Rong X, Cai P, Dai K, Huang Q (2013) The effect of extracellular polymeric substances on the adhesion of bacteria to clay minerals and goethite. Chem Geol 360:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jain K, Parida S, Mangwani N, Dash HR, Das S (2013) Isolation and characterization of biofilm-forming bacteria and associated extracellular polymeric substances from oral cavity. Ann Microbiol 63:1553–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeffrey WH, Nazaret S, Barkay T (1996) Detection of the merA gene and its expression in the environment. Microb Ecol 32:293–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kristian SA, Birkenstock TA, Sauder U, Mack D, Götz F, Landmann R (2008) Biofilm formation induces C3a release and protects Staphylococcus epidermidis from IgG and complement deposition and from neutrophil-dependent killing. J Infect Dis 197:1028–1035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Leid JG, Willson CJ, Shirtliff ME, Hassett DJ, Parsek MR, Jeffers AK (2005) The exopolysaccharide alginate protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria from IFN-γ-mediated macrophage killing. J Immunol 175:7512–7518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Leonhäuser J, Wang W, Deckwer WD, Wagner-Döbler I (2007) Functioning of the mercury resistance operon at extremely high Hg(II) loads in a chemostat: a proteome analysis. J Biotechnol 132:469–480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lisovskyy IP, Litovchenko VG, Mazunov DO, Kaschieva S, Koprinarova J, Dmitriev SN (2005) Infrared spectroscopy study of Si-SiO2 structures irradiated with high-energy electrons. J Optoelectron Adv Mater 7:325–328Google Scholar
  34. Ma H, Bryers JD (2010) Non-invasive method to quantify local bacterial concentrations in a mixed culture biofilm. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37:1081–1089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Mah TFC, O’Toole GA (2001) Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol 9:34–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mangwani N, Dash HR, Chauhan A, Das S (2012) Bacterial quorum sensing: functional features and potential applications in biotechnology. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 22:215–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakamura K, Nakahara H (1988) Simplified X-ray film method for detection of bacterial volatilization of mercury chloride by Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:2871–2873PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Nascimento AM, Chartone-Souza E (2003) Operon mer: bacterial resistance to mercury and potential for bioremediation of contaminated environments. Genet Mol Res 2:92–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Neurath H, Hill RL (1977) The proteins. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Nishikawa Y, Nakano T, Noda I (2012) Detection of reversible nonlinear dynamic responses of polymer films by using time-resolved soft-pulse compression attenuated total reflection step-scan fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 66:312–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Oregaard G, Sorenson SJ (2007) High diversity of bacterial mercuric reductase genes from surface and sub-surface floodplain soil (Oak Ridge, USA). ISME J 1:453–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Toole GA (2003) To build a biofilm. J Bacteriol 185:2687–2689CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R (2000) Biofilm formation as microbial development. Ann Rev Microbiol 54:49–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pavia D, Lampman G, Kriz G, Vyvyan J (2008) Introduction to spectroscopy. In: Cengage learning, pp 784Google Scholar
  45. Pepi M, Gaggi C, Bernardini E, Focardi S, Lobianco A, Ruta M, Nicolardi V, Volterrani M, Gasperini S, Trinchera G, Renzi P, Gabellini M, Focardi SE (2011) Mercury-resistant bacterial strains Pseudomonas and Psychrobacter spp. isolated from sediments of Orbetello Lagoon (Italy) and their possible use in bioremediation processes. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 65:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pepi M, Focardi S, Tarabelli A, Volterrani M, Focardi SE (2013) Bacterial strains resistant to inorganic and organic forms of mercury isolated from polluted sediments of the Orbetello Lagoon, Italy, and their possible use in bioremediation processes. E3S Web of Conferences. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20130131002
  47. Prakash B, Veeregowda BM, Krishnappa G (2003) Biofilms: a survival strategy of bacteria. Curr Sci 85:1299–1307Google Scholar
  48. Ramaiah N, De J (2003) Unusual rise in mercury-resistant bacteria in coastal environs. Microb Ecol 45:444–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Rapposch S, Zangerl P, Ginzinger W (2000) Influence of fluorescence of bacteria stained with acridine orange on the enumeration of microorganisms in raw milk. J Diary Sci 83:2753–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Santos-Gandelman JF, Cruz K, Crane S, Muricy G, Giambiagi-deMarval M, Barkay T, Laport MS (2014) Potential application in mercury bioremediation of a marine sponge-isolated Bacillus cereus strain Pj1. Curr Microbiol 69:374–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Schroeder WH, Munthe J (1998) Atmospheric mercury—an overview. Atmos Environ 32:809–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seigneur C, Vijayaraghavan K, Lohman K, Karamchandani P, Scott C (2004) Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 38:555–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Settle AF (1997) Handbook of instrumental techniques for analytical chemistry. Prentice Hall Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  55. Sinha A, Pant KK, Khare SK (2012) Studies on mercury bioremediation by alginate immobilized mercury tolerant Bacillus cereus cells. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 71:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sotero-Martins A, Jesus MSD, Lacerda M, Moreira JC, Filgueiras ALL, Barrocas PRG (2008) A conservative region of the mercuric reductase gene (merA) as a molecular marker of bacterial mercury resistance. Braz J Microbiol 39:307–310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Stewart PS (2002) Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. Int J Med Microbiol 292:107–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Stewart PS, William Costerton J (2001) Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358:135–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Teitzel GM, Parsek MR (2003) Heavy metal resistance of biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2313–2320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Vuong C, Voyich JM, Fischer ER, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, DeLeo FR, Otto M (2004) Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) protects Staphylococcus epidermidis against major components of the human innate immune system. Cell Microbiol 6:269–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang X, Wood TK (2011) Toxin-antitoxin systems influence biofilm and persister cell formation and the general stress response. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:5577–5583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Wei X, Fang L, Cai P, Huang Q, Chen H, Liang W, Rong X (2011) Influence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on Cd adsorption by bacteria. Environ Pollut 159:1369–1374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Whelan DR, Hiscox TJ, Rood JI, Bambery KR, McNaughton D, Wood BR (2014) Detection of an en masse and reversible B-to A-DNA conformational transition in prokaryotes in response to desiccation. J R Soc Interface. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0454 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Zulaika E, Sembiring L (2014) Indigenous mercury resistant bacterial isolates belong to the genus Bacillus from Kalimas Surabaya as a potential mercury bioreducer. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 4:72–76Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Ecology (LEnME), Department of Life ScienceNational Institute of TechnologyRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations