Complete genome sequence and comparative genome analysis of a new special Yersinia enterocolitica
Yersinia enterocolitica is the most diverse species among the Yersinia genera and shows more polymorphism, especially for the non-pathogenic strains. Individual non-pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains are wrongly identified because of atypical phenotypes. In this study, we isolated an unusual Y. enterocolitica strain LC20 from Rattus norvegicus. The strain did not utilize urea and could not be classified as the biotype. API 20E identified Escherichia coli; however, it grew well at 25 °C, but E. coli grew well at 37 °C. We analyzed the genome of LC20 and found the whole chromosome of LC20 was collinear with Y. enterocolitica 8081, and the urease gene did not exist on the genome which is consistent with the result of API 20E. Also, the 16 S and 23 SrRNA gene of LC20 lay on a branch of Y. enterocolitica. Furthermore, the core-based and pan-based phylogenetic trees showed that LC20 was classified into the Y. enterocolitica cluster. Two plasmids (80 and 50 k) from LC20 shared low genetic homology with pYV from the Yersinia genus, one was an ancestral Yersinia plasmid and the other was novel encoding a number of transposases. Some pathogenic and non-pathogenic Y. enterocolitica-specific genes coexisted in LC20. Thus, although it could not be classified into any Y. enterocolitica biotype due to its special biochemical metabolism, we concluded the LC20 was a Y. enterocolitica strain because its genome was similar to other Y. enterocolitica and it might be a strain with many mutations and combinations emerging in the processes of its evolution.
KeywordsComplete genome sequence Comparative genome analysis Phylogenetic analysis Yersinia
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Project, no. 31100101) and the National Sci-Tech Key Project (2012ZX10004-201, 2013ZX10004203-002). We thank Liuying Tang and Jim Nelson for critical reading of and helpful comments on our manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bercovier H, Falcou J, Brault G, Buissiere J, Mollaret HH (1981) gamma Glutamyltransferase activity in the genus “Yersinia” (author’s transl). Ann Microbiol 132:197–200Google Scholar
- Lewin A, Strauch E, Hertwig S, Hoffmann B, Nattermann H, Appel B (1996) Comparison of plasmids of strains of Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1A with the virulence plasmid of a pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strain. Int J Med Microbiol 285:52–63Google Scholar
- McNally A, Cheasty T, Fearnley C, Dalziel RW, Paiba GA, Manning G, Newell DG (2004) Comparison of the biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from pigs, cattle and sheep at slaughter and from humans with yersiniosis in Great Britain during 1999–2000. Lett Appl Microbiol 39:103–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01548.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNally A, Dalton T, La Ragione RM, Stapleton K, Manning G, Newell DG (2006) Yersinia enterocolitica isolates of differing biotypes from humans and animals are adherent, invasive and persist in macrophages, but differ in cytokine secretion profiles in vitro. J Med Microbiol 55:1725–1734. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46726-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spinner JL, Seo KS, O’Loughlin JL, Cundiff JA, Minnich SA, Bohach GA, Kobayashi SD (2010) Neutrophils are resistant to Yersinia YopJ/P-induced apoptosis and are protected from ROS-mediated cell death by the type III secretion system. PLoS ONE 5:e9279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009279 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar