Deciphering the role of Burkholderia cenocepacia membrane proteins in antimicrobial properties of chitosan
- 434 Downloads
Chitosan, a versatile derivative of chitin, is widely used as an antimicrobial agent either alone or mixed with other natural polymers. Burkholderia cenocepacia is a multidrug-resistant bacteria and difficult to eradicate. Our previous studies shown that chitosan had strong antibacterial activity against B. cenocepacia. In the current study, we have investigated the molecular aspects for the susceptibility of B. cenocepacia in response to chitosan antibacterial activity. We have conducted RNA expression analysis of drug efflux system by RT-PCR, membrane protein profiling by SDS–PAGE, and by LC-MS/MS analysis following the validation of selected membrane proteins by real-time PCR analysis. By RT-PCR analysis, it was found that orf3, orf9, and orf13 were expressed at detectable levels, which were similar to control, while rest of the orf did not express. Moreover, shotgun proteomics analysis revealed 21 proteins in chitosan-treated cells and 16 proteins in control. Among them 4 proteins were detected as shared proteins under control and chitosan-treated cells and 17 proteins as uniquely identified proteins under chitosan-treated cells. Among the catalog of uniquely identified proteins, there were proteins involved in electron transport chain and ATP synthase, metabolism of carbohydrates and adaptation to atypical conditions proteins which indicate that utilization and pattern of chitosan is diverse which might be responsible for its antibacterial effects on bacteria. Moreover, our results showed that RND drug efflux system, which display the ability to transport a variety of structurally unrelated drugs from a cell and consequently are capable of conferring resistance to a diverse range of chemotherapeutic agents, was not determined to play its role in response to chitosan. It might be lipopolysaccharides interaction with chitosan resulted in the destabilization of membrane protein to membrane lyses to cell death. Membrane proteome analysis were also validated by RT-qPCR analysis, which corroborated our results that of membrane proteins.
KeywordsChitosan Antibacterial activity RND efflux Membrane proteins
This project was supported by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303015, 201003066) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY12C14007).
- Bazzini S, Udine C, Sass A, Pasca MR, Longo F, Emiliani G, Fondi M, Perrin E, Decorosi F, Viti C, Giovannetti L, Leoni L, Fani R, Riccardi G, Mahenthiralingam E, Buroni S (2011) Deciphering the role of RND efflux transporters in Burkholderia cenocepacia. PLoS One 6(4):e18902PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dina Raafat, Bargen K, Haas A, Sahl HG (2008) Insights into the mode of action of chitosan as an antibacterial compound. Appl Environ Microbial 12:3764–3773Google Scholar
- Franklin TJ, Snow GA (1981) Biochemistry of antimicrobial action, 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, p 175Google Scholar
- Muzzarelli RAA, Boudrant J, Meyer D, Manno N, DeMarchis M, Paoletti MG (2012) Current views on fungal chitin/chitosan, human chitinases, food preservation, glucans, pectins and inulin: a tribute to Henri Braconnot, precursor of the carbohydrate polymers science, on the chitin bicentennial. Carbohydr Polym 87:995–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nikaido H (1996) Outer membrane. In: Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R, Ingraham JL, Brooks Low K, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE (Eds.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology (2nd ed.) (Vol. 1, pp. 29–47). edition. Washington DC: American Society for MicrobiologyGoogle Scholar
- No HK, Meyers SPJ (1995) Aquat Food Prod Technol 4:27–52Google Scholar
- Rabea EI, Badawy MET, Stevens CV, Smagghe G, Steurbaut W (2003) Biomacromolecules 4:1457–1465Google Scholar
- Solov'eva T, Davydova V, Krasikova I, Yermak I (2013) Marine compounds with therapeutics potential in Gram negative species. Mar Drugs 11:2216–2229Google Scholar
- Takemono K, Sunamoto J, Askasi M (1989) Polymers and medical care. Mita, Tokyo Chapter IVGoogle Scholar
- Tikhonov VE, Stepnova EA, Babak VG, Yamskov IA, Palma-Guerrero J, Jansson HB, Lopez-Llorca LV, Salinas J, Gerasimenko DV, Avdienko ID, Varlamov VP (2006) Bactericidal and antifungal activities of a low molecular weight chitosan and its N-/2(3)-(dodec-2-enyl) succinoyl/-derivatives. Carbohydr Polym 64:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar