Advertisement

Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 191, Issue 5, pp 415–424 | Cite as

Comparative effectiveness of Pseudomonas and Serratia sp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt-stressed conditions

  • Zahir Ahmad ZahirEmail author
  • Usman Ghani
  • Muhammad Naveed
  • Sajid Mahmood Nadeem
  • Hafiz Naeem Asghar
Original Paper

Abstract

Ethylene synthesis is accelerated in response to various environmental stresses like salinity. Ten rhizobacterial strains isolated from wheat rhizosphere taken from different salt affected areas were screened for growth promotion of wheat under axenic conditions at 1, 5, 10 and 15 dS m−1. Three strains, i.e., Pseudomonas putida (N21), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (N39) and Serratia proteamaculans (M35) showing promising performance under axenic conditions were selected for a pot trial at 1.63 (original), 5, 10 and 15 dS m−1. Results showed that inoculation was effective even in the presence of higher salinity levels. P. putida was the most efficient strain compared to the other strains and significantly increased the plant height, root length, grain yield, 100-grain weight and straw yield up to 52, 60, 76, 19 and 67%, respectively, over uninoculated control at 15 dS m−1. Similarly, chlorophyll content and K+/Na+ of leaves also increased by P. putida over control. It is highly likely that under salinity stress, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid-deaminase activity of these microbial strains might have caused reduction in the synthesis of stress (salt)-induced inhibitory levels of ethylene. The results suggested that these strains could be employed for salinity tolerance in wheat; however, P. putida may have better prospects in stress alleviation/reduction.

Keywords

Salinity Pseudomonas Serratia ACC-deaminase Ethylene Triticum aestivum L. 

Abbreviations

ACC

1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid

CFU

Colony-forming unit

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this manuscript was financially supported by Higher Education Commission (HEC), Islamabad, Pakistan.

References

  1. Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME Jr (1992) Ethylene in plant biology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arshad M, Frankenberger WT Jr (2002) Ethylene: agricultural sources and applications. Kluwer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Asghar HN, Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Khaliq A (2002) Relationship between in vitro production of auxins by rhizobacteria and their growth-promoting activities in Brassica juncea L. Biol Fertil Soils 35:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayers RS, Westcot DW (1985) Water quality for agriculture. FAO irrigation and drainage papers 29 (rev. 1). FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Balota M, Cristescu S, Payne WA, Hekkert SL, Laarhoven LJJ, Harren FJM (2004) Ethylene production of two wheat cultivars exposed to desiccation, heat and paraquat induced oxidation. Crop Sci 44:812–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belimov AA, Safronova VI, Mimura T (2002) Response of spring rape (Brassica napus L. var. Oleifera) to inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase depends on nutrient status of the plant. Can J Microbiol 48:189–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belimov AA, Hontzeas N, Safronova VI, Demchinskaya SV, Piluzza G, Bullitta S, Glick BR (2005) Cadmium-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria associated with the roots of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern.). Soil Biol Biochem 37:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR (2000) Plant growth promoting bacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants. Can J Microbiol 46:237–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng Z, Park E, Glick BR (2007) 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase from Pseudomonas putida UW4 facilitates the growth of canola in the presence of salt. Can J Microbiol 53:912–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics 11:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dworkin M, Foster J (1958) Experiments with some microorganisms which utilize ethane and hydrogen. J Bacteriol 75:592–601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Glick BR, Bashan Y (1997) Genetic manipulation of plant growth-promoting bacteria to enhance biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens. Biotechnol Adv 15:353–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glick BR, Liu C, Ghosh S, Dumbroff EB (1997) Early development of canola seedlings in the presence of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR 12-2. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1233–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190:63–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glick BR, Patten CL, Holguin G, Penrose DM (1999) Biochemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, London, p 267Google Scholar
  17. Grichko VP, Glick BR (2001) Amelioration of flooding stress by ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamdia MA, El-Komy HM (1998) Effect of salinity, gibberllic acid and Azospirillum inoculation on growth and nitrogen uptake of Zea mays. Biol Planta 40:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamdia MA, Shaddad MAK, Doaa MM (2004) Mechanism of salt tolerance and interactive effect of Azospirillum bransilense inoculation on maize cultivars grown under salt stress conditions. Plant Growth Regul 44:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method for growing plant without soil. University of California, Agri. Exp. Stn., Berkly, CA, Circ., pp 347Google Scholar
  21. Jeschke WD, Wolf O (1988) External potassium is not required for root growth in saline conditions: experiments with Ricinus communis L. grown in reciprocal split-root system. J Exp Bot 39:1149–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynch J, Lauchli A (1984) Potassium transport in salt stressed barley roots. Planta 161:295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma JH, Yao JL, Cohen D, Morris B (1998) Ethylene inhibitors enhance in vitro formation from apple shoot culture. Plant Cell Rep 17:211–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maathius FJM, Verlin D, Smith FA, Sandres D, Fernea Bandez JA, Walker NA (1996) The physiological relevance of Na+-coupled K+ transport. Plant Physiol 112:1609–1616Google Scholar
  25. Marcelis LFM, van Hooijdonk H (1999) Effect of salinity on growth, water use and nutrient use in radish (raphanus sativus L.). Plant Soil 215:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mattoo AK, Suttle JC (1991) The plant hormone ethylene. CRC Press, Inc., Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:565–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mead R, Curnow RN, Hasted AM (2003) Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  29. Mehta S, Nautiyal CS (2001) An efficient method for qualitative screening of phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Curr Microbiol 43:57–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nadeem SM, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Arshad M (2007) Preliminary investigations on inducing salt tolerance in maize through inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase activity. Can J Microbiol 53:1141–1149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niu X, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Pardo JM (1995) Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environment. Plant Physiol 109:735–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nukui N, Ezura H, Yohsshi K, Yasuta T, Minamisawa K (2000) Effect of ethylene precursor and inhibitors for ethylene biosynthesis and perception on nodulation in Lotus japonicus and Macroptilium atropurpureum. Plant Cell Physiol 41:893–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roussos PA, Tsantilli E, Pontikis CA (2005) Responses of jojoba explant to different salinity levels during the proliferation stage in vitro. Indus Crops Products 23:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Russell AD, Hugo WB, Ayliffo GAJ (1982) Principles and practices of disinfection, preservation and sterilization. Black Wall Scientific, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan J, Estefan G, Rashid A (2001) Soil and plant analysis: laboratory manual. International centre for agricultural research in dry areas (ICARDA) Aleppo, pp 172Google Scholar
  36. Safronova VI, Stepanok VV, Engqvist GL, Alekseyev YV, Belimove AA (2006) Root-associated bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase improve growth and nutrient uptake by pea genotypes cultivated in cadmium supplemented soil. Biol Fertil Soils 42:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saqib M, Akhtar J, Qureshi RH, Aslam M, Nawaz S (2000) Effect of salinity and sodicity on growth and ionic relations of different wheat genotypes. Pak J Soil Sci 18:99–104Google Scholar
  38. Saravankumar D, Samiyappan R (2007) ACC-deaminase from Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated saline resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogea) plants. J Appl Microbiol 102:1283–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sergeeva E, Shah S, Glick BR (2006) Growth of transgenic canola (Brassica napus cv. Westar) expressing a bacterial 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase gene on high concentrations of salt. World J Microbiol Biochem 22:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaharoona B, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2006) Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase on maize (Zea mays L.) growth under axenic conditions and on nodulation in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Lett Appl Microbiol 42:155–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaharoona B, Jamro GM, Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Memon KS (2007) Effectiveness of various Pseudomonas spp. and Burkhaldaria caryophylli containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:1300–1307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Simons M, van der Bij AJ, Brand I, de Weger LA, Wijffelman CA, Lugtenberg BJJ (1996) Gnotobiotic system for studying rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe Inter 9:600–607Google Scholar
  43. Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dicky DA (1997) Principles and procedures of statistics––a biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill, Singapore, pp 204–227Google Scholar
  44. Youssef E, Karrou M, Benichou M (2000) Salt stress on epinasty in relation to ethylene production and water relation to tomato. Agronomie 20:399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yue H, Mo W, Li C, Zheng Y, Li H (2007) The salt stress relief and growth promotion effect of RS-5 on cotton. Plant Soil 297:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zahir ZA, Munir A, Asghar HN, Shaharoona B, Arshad M (2007) Effectiveness of rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase for growth promotion of pea (Pisum sativum) under drought conditions. J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:958–963Google Scholar
  47. Zhu JK, Hasegava PM, Bressan RA (1997) Molecular aspect of osmotic stress. Crit Rev Plant Sci 16:253–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zahir Ahmad Zahir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Usman Ghani
    • 1
  • Muhammad Naveed
    • 1
  • Sajid Mahmood Nadeem
    • 1
  • Hafiz Naeem Asghar
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations