Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 189, Issue 1, pp 43–47 | Cite as

Alkaline phosphatase as a reporter of σS levels and rpoS polymorphisms in different E. coli strains

Original Paper


σS is responsible for the transcriptional regulation of genes related to protection against stresses and bacterial survival and it accumulates in the cell under conditions of stress, such as nutrient limitation. An increase in the levels of σS causes a reduction in the expression of genes that are transcribed by RNA polymerase associated with the principal sigma factor, σ70. phoA, that encodes alkaline phosphatase (AP) is expressed under phosphate shortage conditions, and is also repressed by σS. Here we show that in a Pi-limited chemostat, accumulation of rpoS mutations is proportional to the intrinsic level of σS in the cells. Acquisition of mutations in rpoS relieves repression of the PHO genes. We also devised a non-destructive method based on the rpoS effect on AP that differentiates between rpoS+ and rpoS mutants, as well as between high and low-σS producers. Using this method, we provide evidence that σS contributes to the repression of AP under conditions of Pi excess and that AP variation among different strains is at least partly due to intrinsic variation in σS levels. Consequently, a simple and non-destructive AP assay can be employed to differentiate between strains expressing different levels of σS on agar plates.


rpoS Sigma factor Alkaline phosphatase PHO regulon 



Alkaline phosphatase







This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP- Brazil) and the Endeavour Research Fellowships (Australia).


  1. Colland F, Barth M, Hengge-Aronis R, Kolb A (2000) Sigma factor selectivity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: role for Crp, IHF and Lrp transcription factors. EMBO J 19:3028–3037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Echols H, Garen A, Garen S, Torriani A (1961) Genetic control of repression of alkaline phosphatase in E. coli. J Mol Biol 3:425–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Farewell A, Kvint K, Nyström T (1998) Negative regulation by rpoS: a case of sigma factor competition. Mol Microbiol 29:1039–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferenci T (2005) Maintaining a healthy SPANC balance through regulatory and mutational adaptation. Mol Microbiol 57:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hengge-Aronis R (2002) Signal transduction and regulatory mechanisms involved in control of the sigma(S) (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:373–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hengge-Aronis R, Fischer D (1992) Identification and molecular analysis of glgS, a novel growth-phase-regulated and rpoS-dependent gene involved in glycogen synthesis in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 6:1877–1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. King T, Ishihama A, Kori A, Ferenci T (2004) A regulatory trade-off as a source of strain variation in the species Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:5614–5620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lange R, Barth M, Hengge-Aronis R (1993) Complex transcriptional control of the sigma S-dependent stationary-phase-induced and osmotically regulated osmy (csi-5) gene suggests novel roles for Lrp, cyclic amp (cAMP) receptor protein-camp complex, and integration host factor in the stationary-phase response of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 175:7910–7917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maeda H, Fujita N, Ishihama A (2000) Competition among seven Escherichia coli sigma subunits: relative binding affinities to the core RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res 28:3497–3503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maharjan R, Seeto S, Notley-McRobb L, Ferenci T (2006) Clonal adaptive radiation in a constant environment. Science 313:514–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miller J (1992) A short course in bacterial genetics: a laboratory manual and handbook for Escherichia coli and related bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  12. Notley-McRobb L, King T, Ferenci T (2002) Rpos mutations and loss of general stress resistance in Escherichia coli populations as a consequence of conflict between competing stress responses. J Bacteriol 184:806–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ochman H, Selander RK (1984) Standard reference strains of Escherichia coli from natural populations. J Bacteriol 157:690–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Paget MSB, Helmann JD (2003) The sigma70 family of sigma factors. Genome Biol 4:203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schellhorn HE, Hassan HM (1988) Transcriptional regulation of katE in Escherichia coli k-12. J Bacteriol 170:4286–4292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Spira B, Silberstein N, Yagil E (1995) Guanosine 3′,5′-bispyrophosphate (ppGpp) synthesis in cells of Escherichia coli starved for Pi. J Bacteriol 177:4053–4058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Taschner NP, Yagil E, Spira B (2004) A differential effect of sigmaS on the expression of the PHO regulon genes of Escherichia coli. Microbiology 150:2985–2992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Taschner NP, Yagil E, Spira B (2006) The effect of IHF on sigmaS selectivity of the phoA and pst promoters of Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol 185:234–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vijayakumar SRV, Kirchhof MG, Patten CL, Schellhorn HE (2004) Rpos-regulated genes of Escherichia coli identified by random lacZ fusion mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 186:8499–8507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wanner BL (1996) Phosphorous assimilation and control of the phosphate regulon. In: Neidhardt FC, Curtiss RI, Ingraham JL, Lin EC, Low KBJ, Magasanik B, Reznikoff W, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE (eds) Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium cellular and molecular biology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 1357–1381Google Scholar
  21. Weber H, Polen T, Heuveling J, Wendisch VF, Hengge R (2005) Genome-wide analysis of the general stress response network in Escherichia coli: sigmaS-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity. J Bacteriol 187:1591–1603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências BiomédicasUniversidade de São PauloSão Paulo, SPBrazil
  2. 2.School of Molecular and Microbial BiosciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations