Open-circuit fault-tolerance in multilevel inverters with reduced component count

  • Niraj Kumar DewanganEmail author
  • Tapan Prakash
  • Jitendra Kumar Tandekar
  • Krishna Kumar Gupta
Original Paper


High component count and subsequent effects on volume and reliability have been the major concerns for practical applications of multilevel inverters (MIs). Recent emergence of the so-called reduced component count MIs (RCC-MIs) has been driven by the attempts to reduce the number of power switches for multilevel power conversion. In many of such topologies, the aspect of fault tolerance has not been given full consideration. In this work, some of the recently proposed RCC-MI topologies have been considered and analyzed in the light of imparting fault tolerance capability in the case of open-switch failure of any one of the power switches. In an RCC-MI, the occurrence of an open-circuit fault in a power switch would often lead to shut down due to the lack of redundant switching states. To overcome these occurrences, an optimal addition of power switches is described in this work so that the desired redundant states can be synthesized. The modified RCC-MI topologies so obtained have been analyzed under the normal and faulty conditions and computer simulations have been carried out using MATLAB/Simulink, and corresponding results have been presented. The results so obtained are experimentally validated to prove the feasibility of the proposed fault-tolerant topologies.


Multilevel inverters RCC-MIs Fault tolerance Single-switch failure Reliability 



  1. 1.
    Gupta KK, Bhatnagar P (2017) Multilevel inverters: conventional and emerging topologies and their control. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 43–68Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dwivedi SK, Jain S, Gupta KK, Chaturvedi P (2018) Modeling and control of power electronics converter systems for power quality improvement. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 121–148Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akagi H (2017) Multilevel converters: fundamental circuits and systems. Proc IEEE 105(11):2048–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kala P, Arora S (2017) A comprehensive study of classical and hybrid multilevel inverter topologies for renewable energy applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:905–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babaei E, Laali S, Bayat Z (2015) A single phase cascaded multi-level inverter based on a new basic unit with reduced number of power switches. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(2):922–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta KK, Ranjan A, Bhatnagar P et al (2016) Multilevel inverter topologies with reduced device count: a review. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(1):135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agrawal R, Jain S (2017) Comparison of reduced part count multilevel inverters (RPC-MLIs) for integration to the grid. Electr Power Energy Syst 84:214–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ebrahimi J, Babaei E, Gharehpetian GB (2012) A new multilevel converter topology with reduced number of power electronic components. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 59(2):655–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta KK, Jain S (2014) A novel multilevel inverter based on switched DC sources. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(7):3269–3278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mokhberdoran A, Ajami A (2014) Symmetric and asymmetric design and implementation of new cascaded multilevel inverter topology. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29(12):6712–6724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Odeh CI, Obe ES, Ojo O (2016) Topology for cascaded multilevel inverter. IET Power Electron 9(5):921–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gautam SP, Sahu LK, Gupta S (2016) Reduction in number of devices for symmetrical and asymmetrical multilevel inverters. IET Power Electron 9(4):698–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oskuee MRJ, Karimi M, Ravadanegh SN et al (2015) An innovative scheme of symmetric multilevel voltage source inverter with lower number of circuit devices. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(11):6965–6973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Babaei E, Alilu S, Laali S (2014) A new general topology for cascaded multilevel inverters with reduced number of components based on developed H-bridge. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(8):3932–3939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Babaei E (2008) A cascade multilevel converter topology with reduced number of switches. IEEE Trans Power Electron 23(6):2657–2664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kamani PL, Mulla MA (2016) A new multilevel inverter topology with reduced device count and blocking voltage. In: IEEE 16th international conference on environment electrical engineering (EEEIC), Florence, 2016, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang W, Xu D, Enjeti PN et al (2014) Survey on fault-tolerant techniques for power electronic converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29(12):6319–6331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Choi UM, Blaabjerg F, Lee KB (2015) Reliability improvement of a T-type three-level inverter with fault-tolerant control strategy. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(5):2660–2673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi UM, Blaabjerg F, Lee KB (2015) Study and handling methods of power IGBT module failures in power electronic converter systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(5):2517–2533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghazanfari A, Abdel-Rady Y, Mohamed I (2016) A resilient framework for fault-tolerant operation of modular multilevel converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(5):2669–2678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rao AM, Sivakumar K (2015) A fault-tolerant single-phase five-level inverter for grid-independent PV systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(12):7569–7577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Amini J, Moallem M (2016) A fault-diagnosis and fault-tolerant control scheme for flying capacitor multilevel inverters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(3):1818–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodriguez J, Lai J-S, Peng FZ (2002) Multilevel inverters: a survey of topologies, controls, and applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49(4):724–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lezana P, Pou J, Meynard TA et al (2010) Survey on fault operation on multilevel inverters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(7):2207–2218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Song Y, Wang B (2013) Survey on reliability of power electronic systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(1):591–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Choupan R, Golshannavaz S, Nazarpour D et al (2019) A new structure for multilevel inverters with fault-tolerant capability against open circuit faults. Electr Power Syst Res 168:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee SS (2018) A single-phase single-source 7-level inverter with triple voltage boosting gain. IEEE Access 6:30005–30011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hsieh C, Liang T, Chen S et al (2016) Design and implementation of a novel multilevel DC–AC inverter. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 52(3):2436–2443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sun X, Wang B, Zhou Y et al (2016) A single dc source cascaded seven-level inverter integrating switched-capacitor techniques. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(11):7184–7194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Choi J, Kang F (2015) Seven-level PWM inverter employing series-connected capacitors paralleled to a single DC voltage source. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(6):3448–3459Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringG H Raisoni Institute of Engineering and TechnologyNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringNational Institute of Technology RaipurRaipurIndia
  3. 3.School of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringVIT Bhopal UniversityBhopalIndia
  4. 4.Electrical and Instrumentation Engineering DepartmentThapar Institute of Engineering and TechnologyPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations