Advertisement

Electrical Engineering

, Volume 101, Issue 3, pp 855–865 | Cite as

Study and improvement in the radio communication quality for rotating electrical machine

  • Sonia Ben BrahimEmail author
  • Ridha Bouallegue
  • Jacques David
  • Tan Hoa Vuong
Original Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

The wireless communication for rotating electrical machines is beneficial for diagnosis purposes as well as real-time monitoring. The electromagnetic waves propagation characteristics inside electrical machine is rather delicate. So it will be interesting to find a dynamic tool adapted to our problem. The idea is to validate these propagation concepts with real signatures. The tool must then analyze the signatures of the received signal strength indication. These experiments have shown that the antenna rotation is a disturbance-causing factor of the signal transmission. Thus, in this paper, our aim is to analyze the electromagnetic wave propagation characteristics in rotating environments in order to obtain the optimum parameters and providing a strong theoretical support for radio monitoring system performance improvement. Therefore, our work will process the important parameter which is the path loss variation in rotating environments.

Keywords

Wireless communication Rotating electrical machines RSSI Path Loss Propagation model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Innov’COM Laboratory of Higher School of Telecommunication, University of Carthage, Tunisia, and LAPLACE Laboratory of the National Polytechnic Institute of Toulouse, France.

References

  1. 1.
    Tavner PJ (2008) Review of condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines. IET Electr Power Appl 2(4):215–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Habetler TG, Harley RG, Tallam RM, Lee SB, Obaid R, Stack J (2002) Complete current-based induction motor condition monitoring: stator, rotor, bearings, and load. In: 8th IEEE international power electronics congress CIEPGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tashakori A, Ektesabi M (2013) A simple fault tolerant control system for Hall effect sensors failure of BLDC motor. In: 8th IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben Brahim S, Bouallegue R, David J, Vuong TH (2015) Wireless communication to monitor the rotating electrical machines. In: 23rd international conference on software telecommunications and computer networks (SoftCOM)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ben Brahim S, Bouallegue R, David J, Vuong TH, David M (2016) A wireless on-line temperature monitoring system for rotating electrical machine. Wirel Pers Commun 95(2):979–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben Brahim S, Bouallegue R, David J, Vuong TH, David M (2016) Design and implementation of wireless sensor network node for rotating electrical machine. In: The twenty-first IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheikh-Mhand (2010) Design and Etude du canal de propagation radio pour les systèmes embarqués sans fil automobile. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse-INPTGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nader M, Jawhar I (2008) A fault tolerant wired/wireless sensor network architecture for monitoring pipeline infrastructures. In: International conference on sensor technologies and applications (SENSORCOMM’08)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henao H, Capolino G-A, Fernandez-Cabanas M, Filippetti F, Bruzzese C, Strangas E, Pusca R, Estima J, Riera-Guasp M, Hedayati-Kia S (2014) Trends in fault diagnosis for electrical machines: a review of diagnostic techniques. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 8:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hubert CI (1990) Electric machines. Prentice Hall Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cupertino F, Vanna E, Salvatore L, Stasi S (2004) Analysis techniques for detection of induction motor broken rotor bars after supply disconnection. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 40(2):526–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aileen J, Nagarajan S, Rama Reddy S (2011) Detection of broken bars in three phase squirrel cage induction motor using finite element method. In: International conference on emerging trends in electrical and computer technology (ICETECT)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zaabi W, Bensalem Y, Trabelsi H (2014) Fault analysis of induction machine using Finite Element Method (FEM). In: 15th international conference on sciences and techniques of automatic control and computer engineering (STA)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pande DC (1999) Electromagnetic compatibility problems in mobile communication systems. In: International conference on electromagnetic interference and compatibility (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shapira J (2011) Electromagnetic compatibility for system engineers. IETE Tech Rev 28:70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mathur M, Rai JK, Sridhar N (2016) Electromagnetic compatibility analysis of projected capacitive touch technology based panel computer for military application. J Electromagn Waves Appl 30(13):1689–1701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ben Brahim S, Bouallegue R, David J, Vuong TH, David M (2016) Modelling and characterization of rotor temperature monitoring system. In: 12th international conference on wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Akeyama A, Sakagami S, Yosizawa K (1990) Propagation characteristics of air-ground propagation paths, 900MHz band. IEEE Trans IEICE Jpn J73–B–11:838–842Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hata M (1980) Empirical formula for propagation loss in land mobile radio service. IEEE Trans Veh Technol VT–29:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ben Brahim S, Bouallegue R, David J, Vuong TH (2015) Electromagnetic wave propagation characteristics of rotating antenna in electrical machine. In: 11th international conference on wireless communication and mobile computing (WiCOM) (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ben Brahim S, Bouallegue R, David J, Vuong TH (2016) Path-loss characteristics for wireless communication system in rotating electrical machine. In: 11th international conference on wireless communication and mobile computing (AINA) (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sinan K, Bulent T (2017) Path-loss modeling for wireless sensor networks: a review of models and comparative evaluations. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 59:18–37Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu J, Yan X, Zhu Y, Wang J, Yang Y, Ge X, Mao G, Tirkkonen O (2017) Statistical analysis of path losses for sectorized wireless networks. IEEE Trans Commun 65(4):1828–1838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Microchip. RN-171 Data Sheet (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Microchip. RN-171-EK Data Sheet (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sommer C, Joerer S, Dressler F (2012) On the applicability of two-ray path loss models for vehicular network simulation. In: Vehicular networking conference (VNC). IEEE, pp 64–69 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leng Y, Pan YF, Li QX, Liu S (2008) Analysis of electromagnetic wave propagation characteristics in rotating environment. In: Proceedings of ICEPTHDP international conference, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kong JA (2002) Electromagnetic wave theory. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 889–903Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leng Y, Dong W, Peng S, Ge X, Nga GJ, Sheng L (2012) Study on electromagnetic wave propagation characteristics in rotating environments and its application in tire pressure monitoring. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 61:1765–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rappaport TS (2004) Wireless communications: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing (ch. 3)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.InnoV’COM Laboratory-Sup’ComUniversity of CarthageTunisTunisia
  2. 2.LAPLACE Laboratory-UMR5213INPTToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations