Advertisement

Design of the magnetic hysteresis mathematical model based on Preisach theory

  • Mikhail Andreev
  • Alisher Askarov
  • Aleksey SuvorovEmail author
Original Paper
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

In the frame of the constantly increasing in electric power systems (EPSs) complexity, the challenge of ensuring adequacy of relay protection (RP) devices operation becomes more and more urgent. The authors propose to use the detailed mathematical models of the combination «instrument transformers (IT)—RP» with modern EPS simulators as the solution. It is very important to adequately simulate IT, in particular, the magnetic core magnetization process, because IT largely determines the shape of the RP-controlled signal and affects on its operation. However, in practice simplified models are currently used due to the lack of an accurate mathematical description of the IT core magnetization characteristics. Such models do not reflect all processes in the magnetic core. The aim of this work is to develop a hysteresis mathematical model, which will have a high accuracy in reproducing the magnetization processes of transformer core. The main research method is mathematical modeling of the ferromagnetic material magnetization processes in the MathCAD software. The article presents main development principles of the mathematical model with magnetic hysteresis memory based on the Preisach theory, which reproduces with high accuracy both the major and minor hysteresis loops.

Keywords

Relay protection Magnetic hysteresis Mathematical simulation Inverse hysteresis model Preisach theory Major hysteresis loop Minor hysteresis loop 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation under the governmental Grant “Science” No. 13.5852.2017/8.9 (Development of the concept for comprehensive validation of calculating modes and processes in electric power system and tools of its realization).

References

  1. 1.
    Dommel HW (1969) Digital computer solution of electromagnetic transients in single- and multiphase networks. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 88(4):388–399.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1969.292459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matyuk VF, Osipov AA (2011) Mathematical model of magnetization curve and magnetic hysteresis loops. Part I. Analysis of models. Nerazrushajushhij kontrol’ i diagnostika 2:3–35Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deane JHB (1994) Modeling the dynamics of nonlinear inductor circuits. IEEE Trans Magn 30(5):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.312521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carpenter KH (1991) A differential equation approach to minor loops in the Jiles–Atherton hysteresis model. IEEE Trans Magn 27(6):4404–4406.  https://doi.org/10.1109/20.278655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naumov VA, Shevcov VM (2003) Mathematical model of current transformer in the research of differential protection algorithms. Elektricheskie stantsii 3:51–56Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Novash IF, Rumjancev JF (2015) Simplified model of three phase groups of current transformers in the system dynamic modelling. In: Energetika. Proceedings of CIS higher education institutions and power engineering associations, vol 5, pp 23–38Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korol EG (2007) Analysis of methods of modelling hysteresis loop of ferromagnetic materials. Electr Eng Electromech 6:44–47Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mishchenko EN (2015) Magnetic hysteresis. Measurement and processing methods of experimental data. Bull Rostov State Transp Univ 57(1):116–122Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lambert J (1973) Computational methods in ordinary differential equations. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hairer E, Wanner G (1996) Solving ordinary differential equations II: stiff and differential algebraic problems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamming R (1962) Numerical methods for scientists and engineers. Dover Publications, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andreev M, Gusev A, Ruban N et al (2018) Hybrid real-time simulator of large-scale power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2876668 (in print) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Preisach F (1935) Uber die magnetische nachwirkung. Z Phys 94:277–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eichler J, Novák M, Košek M (2017) Differences between Preisach model and experiment for soft ferromagnetic materials, effect of instrument accuracy. In: IEEE international workshop of electronics, control, measurement, signals and their application to mechatronics (ECMSM), pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ecmsm.2017.7945877
  15. 15.
    Willerich S, Herzog H (2016) Interpretation of an energy based hysteresis model as a scalar Preisach operator. In: IEEE conference on electromagnetic field computation (CEFC), pp 1–1.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cefc.2016.7815903
  16. 16.
    Tousignant M, Sirois F, Kedous-Lebouc A (2016) Identification of the Preisach model parameters using only the major hysteresis loop and the initial magnetization curve. In: IEEE conference on electromagnetic field computation (CEFC), pp 1–1.  https://doi.org/10.1109/cefc.2016.7816148
  17. 17.
    Anooshahpour F, Polushin IG, Patel RV (2016) Classical Preisach model of hysteretic behavior in a da Vinci instrument. In: IEEE international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), pp 1392–1397.  https://doi.org/10.1109/aim.2016.7576965
  18. 18.
    Eichler J, Novák M, Košek M (2016) Experimental-numerical method for identification of weighting function in Preisach model for ferromagnetic materials. In: International conference on applied electronics (AE), pp 75–80.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ae.2016.7577245
  19. 19.
    Eichler J, Novák M, Košek M (2016) Implementation of the first order reversal curve method for identification of weight function in Preisach model for ferromagnetics. In: ELEKTRO, pp 602–607.  https://doi.org/10.1109/elektro.2016.7512149
  20. 20.
    Zsurzsan T, Andersen MAE, Zhang Z et al (2015) Preisach model of hysteresis for the piezoelectric actuator drive. In: 41st annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society (IECON), pp 2788–2793.  https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon.2015.7392524
  21. 21.
    Mittal S, Menq CH (2000) Hysteresis compensation in electromagnetic actuators through Preisach model inversion. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 5(4):394–409.  https://doi.org/10.1109/3516.891051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wawrzała P (2013) Application of a Preisach hysteresis model to the evaluation of PMN-PT ceramics properties. Arch Metall Mater 58(4):1347–1350.  https://doi.org/10.2478/amm-2013-0172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andreev MV, Borovikov YS, Sulaymanov AO (2015) Instruments for all-regimes simulation of transformers differential protections in electrical power systems. Russ Electromech 4:63–67.  https://doi.org/10.17213/0136-3360-2015-4-63-67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division for Power and Electrical Engineering, School of Energy and Power EngineeringTomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations