Electrical Engineering

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 241–253 | Cite as

Network switching and voltage evaluation during power system restoration

  • Abbas Ketabi
  • Iman Sadeghkhani
  • Rene Feuillet
Original Paper


In this work, voltage evaluation after power components energization such as transmission line, transformer and shunt reactor is analyzed using artificial neural network (ANN)-based approach. Throughout the initial phase of system restoration, unexpected overvoltage may happen due to nonlinear interaction between the unloaded transformer and the transmission system. Such an overvoltage might damage some equipment and delay power system restoration. In the cases of transformer and shunt reactor energization, ANN is trained with the worst case scenario of switching angle and remanent flux which reduce the number of required simulations for training ANN. Moreover, for achieving good generalization capability for developed ANN, equivalent parameters of the network are used as ANN inputs. The simulated results for a partial of 39-bus New England test system show that the proposed technique can estimate the peak values and duration of overvoltages during network switching with good accuracy.


Artificial neural networks Transient overvoltages  Power system restoration  Power components energization 

Nomenclatures and abbreviations


Artificial neural network


Levenberg Marquardt


Multi-layer perceptron


Power system blockset


Temporary overvoltages


Harmonic index


Thevenin impedance at the bus j for hth harmonic


Inrush current for hth harmonic

\(\phi _\mathrm{r}\)

Remanent flux


Switching time


Fundamental frequency


  1. 1.
    Adibi MM, Alexander RW, Avramovic B (1992) Overvoltage control during restoration. IEEE Trans Power Syst 7(4):1464–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ketabi A, Ranjbar AM, Feuillet R (2002) Analysis and control of temporary overvoltages for automated restoration planning. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 17(4):1121–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayashi T et al (1990) Modeling and simulation of black start and restoration of an electric power system. Results of a questionnaire. Electra 131:157–169Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadeghkhani I (2009) Using artificial neural network for estimation of switching and resonance overvoltages during bulk power system restoration. M.Sc. dissertation, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of KashanGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sadeghkhani I, Ketabi A, Feuillet R (2009) New approach to harmonic overvoltages reduction during transformer energization via controlled switching. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on intelligent system applications to power systems, Curitiba, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morin G (1987) Service restoration following a major failure on the hydroquebec power system. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 2(2):454–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sadeghkhani I, Ketabi A, Feuillet R (2009) Estimation of temporary overvoltages during power system restoration using artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of 15th international conference on intelligent system applications to power systems, Curitiba, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ketabi A, Sadeghkhani I (2011) Electric power systems simulation using MATLAB. Morsal Publications, Kashan (in Persian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sybille G, Brunelle P, Hoang L, Dessaint LA, Al-Haddad K (2000) Theory and applications of power system blockset, a MATLAB/Simulink-based simulation tool for power systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society, Winter Meeting, pp 774–779Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duro MM (2009) Damping modelling in transformer energization studies for system restoration: some standard models compared to field measurements. In: Proceedings of IEEE Bucharest Power Tech Conference, Bucharest, RomaniaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sybille G, Gavrilovic MM, Belanger J, Do VQ (1985) Transformer saturation effects on EHV system overvoltages. IEEE Trans Power App Syst PAS104(3):671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haykin S (1998) Neural network: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thukaram D, Khincha HP, Khandelwal S (2006) Estimation of switching transient peak overvoltages during transmission line energization using artificial neural network. Electric Power Syst Res 76(4):259–269Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(6): 989–993 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prikler L, Ban G, Banfai G (1997) EMTP models for simulation of shunt reactor switching transients. Electr. Power Energy Syst 19(4):235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keokhoungning T, Premrudeepreechacharn S, Ngamsanroaj K (2009) Evaluation of switching overvoltage in 500 kV transmission line interconnection Nam Theun 2 Power Plant to Roi Et 2 substation. In: Proceedings of Asia Pacific Power and Energy, Engineering Conference, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wunderlich S, Adibi MM, Fischl R, Nwankpa COD (1994) An approach to standing phase angle reduction. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9(1):470–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of KashanKashanIran
  2. 2.Department of Electrical Engineering, Najafabad BranchIslamic Azad UniversityNajafabadIran
  3. 3.Grenoble Electrical Engineering Lab (G2ELab), Grenoble INPGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations