Advertisement

Electrical Engineering

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 149–156 | Cite as

PI and PID controllers tuning for integral-type servo systems to ensure robust stability and controller robustness

  • Radu-Emil PrecupEmail author
  • Stefan Preitl
Original Paper

Abstract

The paper derives PI and PID parametric conditions to guarantee the robust stability of the closed-loop system with respect to parametric variations of plants used in the case of integral-type servo systems. In addition, parametric conditions are obtained to ensure the controller robustness. Then, the parametric conditions are expressed as recommendations for the choice of the design parameter in the case of PI and PID controllers tuning by the extended symmetrical optimum method. A case study including experimental and simulated results illustrates the parametric conditions and design recommendations.

Keywords

Controller robustness Extended symmetrical optimum method PI controllers PID controllers Robust stability 

List of symbols

ACT

Actuator

C

Personal computer

CS

Control system

ESO

Extended symmetrical optimum

MB

Measuring block

SO

Symmetrical optimum

t.f.

Transfer function

μC

Microcontroller

References

  1. 1.
    Åström KJ, Hägglund T (1995) PID controllers theory: design and tuning, 2nd edn. Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, NCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Preitl S, Precup RE (1999) An extension of tuning relations after symmetrical optimum method for PI and PID controllers. Automatica 35:1731–1736CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bodson M (2003) Reconfigurable nonlinear autopilot. J Guid Contr Dynam 26:719–727Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ho MT, Wang HS (2003) PID controller design with guaranteed gain and phase margins. Asian J Contr 5:374–381Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silva GJ, Datta A, Bhattacharyya SP (2003) On the stability and controller robustness of some popular PID tuning rules. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 48:1638–1641CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keel LH, Bhattacharyya SP (1997) Robust, fragile or optimal? IEEE Trans Automat Contr 42:1098–1105CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kharitonov VL (1979) Asymptotic stability of an equilibrium position of a family of systems of linear differential equations. Differential Equations 14:1483–1485zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson BDO, Jury EI, Mansour M (1987) On robust Hurwitz polynomials. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 32:909–913Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kessler C (1958) Das symmetrische Optimum. Regelungstechnik 6:395–400, 432–436zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loron L (1997) Tuning of PID controllers by the non-symmetrical optimum method. Automatica 33:103–107CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.“Politehnica” University of TimisoaraDepartment of Automation and Industrial InformaticsTimisoaraRomania

Personalised recommendations