Monetary rules in a two-sector endogenous growth model

  • Antoine Le RicheEmail author
  • Francesco Magris
  • Daria Onori
Research Article


We study the balanced growth paths and their stability features of a monetary two-sector endogenous growth model with physical capital and human capital accumulation. The demand of money is motivated on the ground of a fractional cash-in-advance constraint on consumption expenditures and on those in the investment in physical capital. We consider, in sequence, two monetary rules implemented by the Central Bank. First, we assume that the latter pegs the money growth rate and then the nominal interest rate according to a Taylor feedback rule. When the Central Bank pegs the money growth rate, there emerges a unique balanced growth path which turns out to be indeterminate for a low amplitude of the liquidity constraint and/or for a low enough intertemporal elasticity of substitution in consumption even under the hypothesis that the cash-in-advance constraint applies uniquely on consumption expenditures. On the other hand, when the monetary policy is implemented according to a Taylor feedback rule, an unintended liquidity trap equilibrium may coexist with multiple interior Taylor equilibria. If, on the one hand, the liquidity trap equilibrium is bound to be locally determinate; on the other hand, the Taylor interior equilibrium may become locally indeterminate provided the cash-in-advance constraint applies also on the investment in physical capital good and under a physical capital intensive human capital good. A global analysis is performed in which we show that the Taylor equilibrium and the liquidity trap one are connected through a heteroclinic orbit.


Cash-in-advance Endogenous growth Indeterminacy Monetary policy Two-sector 

JEL Classification

E32 E52 O41 O42 



  1. Barro, R.: Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J. Polit. Econ. 98, 103–125 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter, M.: Are consumer durables important for business cycles? Rev. Econ. Stat. 78, 147–155 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S., Uribe, M.: The perils of Taylor rules. J. Econ. Theory 96, 40–69 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bich, P., Drugeon, J.P., Morhaim, L.: On temporal aggregators and dynamic programming. Econ. Theory 66, 787–817 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, E.W., Wang, P., Yip, C.K.: A general two-sector model of endogenous growth with human and physical capital: balanced growth and transitional dynamics. J. Econ. Theory 68, 149–173 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benhabib, J., Nishimura, K.: Competitive equilibrium cycles. J. Econ. Theory 35, 284–306 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosi, S., Magris, F.: Indeterminacy and endogenous fluctuations with arbitrary small liquidity constraint. Res. Econ. 57, 39–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosi, S., Magris, F., Venditti, A.: Multiple equilibria in a cash-in-advance two-sector economy. Int. J. Econ. Theory 1, 131–149 (2005a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bosi, S., Cazzavillan, G., Magris, F.: Plausibility of indeterminacy and complex dynamics. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 78, 103–115 (2005b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brito, P., Venditti, A.: Local and global indeterminacy in two-sector models of endogenous growth. J. Math. Econ. 46, 893–911 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M.: Monetary policy in practice: some international evidence. Eur. Econ. Rev. 42, 1033–1067 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drugeon, J.P.: On the emergence of competitive equilibrium growth cycles. Econ. Theory 52, 397–427 (2013). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drugeon, J.P., Ha-Huy, T., Nguyen, T.D.H.: On maximin dynamic programming and the rate of discount. Econ. Theory (2018).
  14. Grandmont, J.-M.: Nonlinear difference equations, bifurcations and chaos: an introduction. Res. Econ. 62, 122–177 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grandmont, J.-M., Pintus, P., de Vilder, R.: Capital-labor substitution and competitive nonlinear endogenous business cycles. J. Econ. Theory 80, 14–59 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruber, J.: A tax-based estimate of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. Q. J. Finance 3, 1–20 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hahn, F., Solow, R.: A Critical Essay on Modern Macroeconomic Theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  18. Hori, T., Mizutani, N., Uchino, T.: Endogenous structural change, aggregate balanced growth, and optimality. Econ. Theory 65, 125–153 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, K.X.D., Meng, Q., Xue, J.: Money growth targeting and indeterminacy in small open economies. Econ. Theory 66, 1–37 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, R.W.: The structure of simple general equilibrium models. J. Polit. Econ. 73, 557–572 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuznetsov, Y.: Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 112. Springer, Berlin (1965)Google Scholar
  22. Le Riche, A., Magris, F., Parent, A.: Liquidity trap and stability of Taylor rules. Math. Soc. Sci. 88, 16–27 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Le Van, C., Pham, N.S.: Intertemporal equilibrium with financial asset and physical capital. Econ. Theory 62, 155–199 (2017). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leeper, E.M.: Equilibria under ’Active’ and ’Passive’ monetary and fiscal policies. J. Monet. Econ. 27, 129–147 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lucas, R.E.: Interest rates and currency prices in a two-country world. J. Monet. Econ. 10, 335–359 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lucas, R.E., Stokey, N.L.: Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital. J. Monet. Econ. 12, 55–93 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menuet, M., Minea, A., Villieu, P.: Deficit, monetization, and economic growth: a case for multiplicity and indeterminacy. Econ. Theory 65, 819–853 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mino, K.: Long-run effects of monetary expansion in a two-sector model of endogenous growth. J. Macroecon. 19, 635–655 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mino, K., Nishimura, K., Shimomura, K., Wang, P.: Equilibrium dynamics in discrete-time endogenous growth models with social constant returns. Econ. Theory 34, 1–23 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulligan, C.: Capital interest and aggregate intertemporal substitution. NBER Working Paper 9373 (2002)Google Scholar
  31. Romer, P.M.: Increasing returns and long-run growth. J. Polit. Econ. 94, 1002–1037 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmitt-Grohé, S., Uribe, M.: Price-level determinacy and monetary policy under a balanced-budget requirement. J. Monet. Econ. 45, 211–246 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sorger, G.: Cycles and chaos in the one-sector growth model with elastic labor supply. Econ. Theory 65, 55–77 (2018). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Svensson, L.E.O.: Money and asset prices in a cash-in-advance economy. J. Polit. Econ. 5, 919–944 (1985)Google Scholar
  35. Takahashi, H.: Optimal balanced growth in a general multi-sector endogenous growth model with constant returns. Econ. Theory 37, 31–49 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Takahashi, H., Mashiyama, K., Sakagami, R.: Does the capital intensity matter? Evidence from the postwar Japanese economy and other OECD countries. Macroecon. Dyn. 16, 103–116 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vissing-Jorgensen, A., Attanasio, O.: Stock-market participation, intertemporal substitution and risk aversion. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 93, 383–391 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodford, M.: Interest Rate and Prices: Foundation of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Tours, CNRS, LEO, FRE 2014OrléansFrance
  3. 3.University of Orléans, CNRS, LEO, FRE 2014OrléansFrance

Personalised recommendations