Advertisement

CAPM-anomalies: quantitative puzzles

  • Sabine ElmigerEmail author
Research Article
  • 172 Downloads

Abstract

The stochastic discount factor is a crucial determinant of the equity premium as well as the cross-sectional distribution of stock returns. This gives rise to the idea that there is a tight link between the equity premium puzzle and cross-sectional asset pricing puzzles. This paper examines similarities between the low-beta premium, the value premium, the small-size premium and the equity premium in a special case of a static consumption-based asset pricing model with constant relative risk aversion and lognormal dividends that can be solved in closed form. The results show that cross-sectional asset pricing puzzles are quantitative puzzles just like the equity premium puzzle: The model generates a premium for stocks with a low beta, a high dividend-price ratio and a small market capitalization but the size of the premium is too small. Furthermore, the size of the premium rises together with the equity premium as the risk aversion coefficient or consumption risk is increased.

Keywords

CAPM CRRA Beta premium Value premium Size premium 

JEL Classification

G12 G11 D50 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bansal, R., Yaron, A.: Risks for the long run: a potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles. J. Finance 59(4), 1481–1509 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banz, R.W.: The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. J. Financ. Econ. 9(1), 3–18 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R.J.: Rare disasters and asset markets in the twentieth century. Q. J. Econ. 121(3), 823–866 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu, S.: Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: a test of the efficient market hypothesis. J. Finance 32(3), 663–682 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, F., Jensen, M.C., Scholes, M.: The capital asset pricing model: some empirical tests. In: Jensen, M.C. (ed.) Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, pp. 79–121. Praeger Publishers Inc., New York (1972)Google Scholar
  6. Breeden, D.T.: An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. J. Financ. Econ. 7(3), 265–296 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, J.Y., Cochrane, J.H.: By force of habit: a consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. J. Polit. Econ. 107(2), 205–251 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, J., Viceira, L.: Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carhart, M.M.: On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1), 57–82 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, L.: On the reversal of return and dividend growth predictability: a tale of two periods. J. Financ. Econ. 92(1), 128–151 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cochrane, J.H., Longstaff, F.A., Santa-Clara, P.: Two trees. Rev. Financ. Stud. 21(1), 347–385 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., Skinner, D.J.: Are dividends disappearing? Dividend concentration and the consolidation of earnings. J. Financ. Econ. 72(3), 425–456 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dittmar, R.F.: Nonlinear pricing kernels, kurtosis preference, and evidence from the cross section of equity returns. J. Finance 57(1), 369–403 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elmiger, S.: Market selection in an evolutionary market with dividends generated by a percolation model. https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/mtec/chair-of-entrepreneurial-risks-dam/documents/dissertation/master (2010). Accessed 14 May 2018
  15. Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 33(1), 3–56 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: The capital asset pricing model: theory and evidence. J. Econ. Perspect. 18(3), 25–46 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frazzini, A., Pedersen, L.H.: Betting against beta. J. Financ. Econ. 111(1), 1–25 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herings, P.J.J., Kübler, F.: Approximate CAPM when preferences are CRRA. Comput. Econ. 29(1), 13–31 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kraus, A., Litzenberger, R.: On the distributional conditions for a consumption-oriented three moment CAPM. J. Finance 38(5), 1381–1391 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lintner, J.: The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev. Econ. Stat. 47(1), 13–37 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucas, R.E.: Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46(6), 1429–1445 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, I.: The Lucas orchard. Econometrica 81(1), 55–111 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mehra, R., Prescott, E.C.: The equity premium: a puzzle. J. Monet. Econ. 15(2), 145–161 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mossin, J.: Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34(4), 768–783 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rubinstein, M.: The valuation of uncertain income streams and the pricing of options. Bell J. Econ. 7(2), 407–425 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sharpe, W.F.: Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finance 19(3), 425–442 (1964)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Banking and FinanceUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations