Advertisement

Economic Theory

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 847–876 | Cite as

Settlement games with rank-order payoffs and applications to sovereign debt restructuring

  • Rohan Pitchford
  • Mark L. J. Wright
Research Article

Abstract

Consider a sovereign who must obtain agreement with all creditors in order to realize a gain from re-entering world capital markets. A simple game of settlement is developed to reflect strategic interaction between creditors in this environment. Payoffs to creditors depend only on the rank-order in which they settle and the solution concept is Markov-perfect equilibrium. This generates an extremely simple and tractable solution under which delay depends a comparison between the immediate payoff and the average over payoffs going forward. The solution can generate sequences of cascade and delay observed in practice. Comparative dynamics, the effect of increasing the number of creditors and the impact on delay of secondary markets are analyzed. We derive the empirical distribution of delay implied by the model for comparison to the observed distribution of delays in the data. Finally, we derive predictions for the time path of settlements within a given sovereign debt restructuring as a function of the motives for creditors to holdout, and compare these predictions with data on the ongoing negotiations to restructure Argentina’s debts.

Keywords

Sovereign debt Negotiation Timing games 

JEL Classification

D23 D78 F34 K12 K33 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the editors and seminar participants for many helpful comments. Pitchford gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Australian Research Council. All remaining errors are our own.

References

  1. Bai, Y., Zhang, J.: Sovereign debt renegotiation and secondary market. Paper presented to Society for Economics Dynamics Conference, Boston (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, D., Wright, M.L.J.: Recovery before redemption: a theory of delays in sovereign debt renegotiations. Unpublished paper, University of California at Los Angeles (2008)Google Scholar
  3. Fudenberg, D., Levine, D.K., Jean, T.: Infinite-horizon models of bargaining with one-sided incomplete information. In: Al, R. (ed.) Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, pp. 73–98. Cambrige University Press, Cambridge (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grossman, S.J., Hart, O.D.: Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell J. Econ. 11(1), 42–64 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haldane, A.G., Penalver, A., Saporta, V., Shin, H.S.: Optimal collective action clause thresholds. Bank of England Working Paper (2004)Google Scholar
  6. Hendricks, K., Weiss, A., Wilson, C.: War of attrition in continuous time with complete information. Int. Econ. Rev. 29(4), 663–680 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kapur, S.: Markov perfect equilibria in an N-player war of attrition. Econ. Lett. 47, 149–154 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kletzer, K.: Sovereign bond restructuring: collective action clauses and official crisis intervention. IMF Working Paper, 03:134 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. Krueger, A.O.: A new approach to sovereign debt restructuring. Address to Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, Delhi, India, December 20. http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2001/112601.htm (2001)
  10. Krueger, A.O.: Sovereign debt restructuring mechanism-one year later. Address to European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, December 10. http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2002/121002.htm (2002a)
  11. Krueger, A.O.: A New Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring. International Monetary Fund, Washington (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Menezes, F.M., Pitchford, R.: A model of seller holdout. Econ. Theory 24(2), 231–253 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pitchford, R., Wright, M.L.J.: Holdouts in sovereign debt restructuring: a theory of negotiation in a weak contractual environment. Rev. Econ. Stud. 79, 812–837 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pitchford, R., Wright, M.L.J.: Restructuring the sovereign debt restructuring mechanism. Mimeo, June 5 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, J.B.: Sovereign debt restructuring: a U.S. perspective. Remarks at the Conference, Sovereign Debt Workouts: Hopes and Hazards, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C. http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/po2056.htm (2002)
  16. Taylor, J.B.: Global Financial Warriors: The Untold Story of International Finance in the Post-9/11 World. W. W. Norton, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Weinschelbaum, F., Wynne, J.: Renegotiation, collective action clauses and sovereign debt markets. J. Int. Econ. 67(1), 47–72 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wright, M.L.J.: Reputation and sovereign debt. Unpublished paper, MIT (2005a)Google Scholar
  19. Wright, M.L.J.: Coordinating creditors. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(2), 388–392 (2005b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research School of EconomicsAustralian National UniversityActonAustralia
  2. 2.Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations