Advertisement

Economic Theory

, Volume 64, Issue 4, pp 675–706 | Cite as

Debt in the US economy

  • Kaiji Chen
  • Ayşe İmrohoroğlu
Research Article

Abstract

In 2011, the publicly held debt-to-GDP ratio in the USA reached \(68\,\%\) and is expected to continue rising. Many proposals to curb the government deficit and the resulting debt are being discussed. In this paper, we use the standard neoclassical growth model to examine the future path of output, budget deficits, and debt in the US economy under different tax policies. While this framework is relatively simple, it incorporates the general equilibrium effects of tax policy, which are often missing from the static scoring method used by the Congressional Budget Office. Our results show that debt-to-GNP ratios above \(100\,\%\) are likely to continue into the future and that even small labor supply elasticities have a significant impact on these projections. We also find that labor income tax rates higher than \(40\,\%\) are needed for the deficit-to-GNP ratio to return to its historical level in the long run. Such high tax rates, however, result in about 10 % lower per capita GNP and large welfare costs at the steady state compared to the historical tax rates.

Keywords

Tax distortion Dynamic Laffer curve Debt-to-GNP ratio 

JEL Classification

E27 E62 H68 

References

  1. Arellano, C., Bai, Y.: Fiscal Austerity During Debt Crises. Working paper, University of Rochester (2014)Google Scholar
  2. Atkeson, A., Chari, V.V., Kehoe, P.: Taxing capital income: a bad idea. Fed. Reserve Bank Minneap. Q. Rev. 23(3), 3–17 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. Auerbach, A.: Dynamic scoring: an introduction to the Issues. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(2), 421–425 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro, R.: Robin hood can’t lead us out of the debt hole. Wall Str. J. (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Baxter, M., King, R.: Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. Am. Econ. Rev. 83(3), 315–334 (1993)Google Scholar
  6. Blundell, R., MaCurdy, T.: Labor supply. In: Ashenfelter, O., Card, D. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, pp. 1559–1695. North-Holland (1999)Google Scholar
  7. Birkeland, K., Prescott, E.C.: On the needed quantity of government debt. Fed. Reserve Bank Minneap. Q. Rev. 31(1), 2–15 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Braun, R.A., Ikeda, D., Joines, D.H.: The saving rate in japan: why it has fallen and why it will remain low. Int. Econ. Rev. 50(1), 291–321 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braun, R.A., Uhlig, H.: The Welfare Enhancing Effects of a Selfish Government in the Presence of Uninsurable, Idiosyncratic Risk. Humboldt University SFB 649 Discussion Paper (2006-070) (2006)Google Scholar
  10. Chari, V.V., Kehoe, P.J., McGrattan, E.R.: Business cycle accounting. Econometrica 75(3), 781–836 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, K., İmrohoroğlu, A., İmrohoroğlu, S.: The Japanese saving rate. Am. Econ. Rev. 96(5), 1850–1858 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, K., İmrohoroğlu, A., İmrohoroğlu, S.: The Japanese saving rate between 1960–2000: productivity, policy changes, and demographics. Econ. Theory 32(1), 87–104 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, K., İmrohoroğlu, A., İmrohoroğlu, S.: A quantitative assessment of the decline in the U.S. current account. J. Monet. Econ. 56(8), 1135–1147 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., Weber, A.: Does Indivisible Labor Explain the Difference between Micro and Macro Elasticities? A Meta-Analysis of Extensive Margin Elasticities. NBER Working Paper No. 16729 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. Cochrane, H.J.: Understanding policy in the great recession: some unpleasant fiscal arithmetic. Eur. Econ. Rev. 55(2011), 2–30 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cochrane, H.J.: CBO and the fiscal cliff. Bloomberg.com (2012)
  17. Cooley, T., Prescott, E.C.: Economic growth and business cycles. In: Cooley, T. (ed.) Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995)Google Scholar
  18. Cole, H.L., Ohanian, L.E.: The great depression in the United States from a neoclassical perspective. Fed. Reserve Bank Minneap. Q. Rev. 23(1), 2–24 (1999)Google Scholar
  19. Congressional Budget Office: CBO’s 2011 Long-Term Budget Outlook (including Supplemental Data), June, http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=12212 (2011)
  20. Fernandez-Villaverde, J., Kuester, K., Guerron, P., Rubio-Ramirez, J.: Fiscal Volatility Shocks and Economic Activity. Working paper (2012)Google Scholar
  21. Hayashi, F., Prescott, E.C.: The 1990s in Japan: a lost decade. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 5(1), 206–235 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holter, H.A., Krueger, D., Stepanchuk, S.: How Does Tax-Progressivity Affect OECD Laffer Curves? Working paper (2013)Google Scholar
  23. Ireland, P.N.: Supply-side economics and endogenous growth. J. Monet. Econ. 33, 559–571 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joines, D.: Estimates of effective marginal tax rates on factor incomes. J. Bus. 54, 191–226 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keane, M.: Labor supply and taxes: a survey. J. Econ. Lit. 49(4), 961–1075 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kehoe, T.J., Prescott, E.C.: Great depressions of the 20th century. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 5(1), 1–18 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ljungqvist, L., Sargent, T.J.: A labor supply elasticity accord. Am. Econ. Rev. 101(3), 478–491 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lucas, Robert: Models of Business Cycles. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1987)Google Scholar
  29. Mankiw, N.G.: I Can Afford Higher Taxes. But They’ll Make Me Work Less. The New York Times, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  30. Mankiw, N.G., Weinzierl, M.: Dynamic scoring: a back-of-the-envelope guide. J. Public Econ. 90(8–9), 1415–1433 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGrattan, E.R.: The macroeconomic effects of distortionary taxation. J. Monet. Econ. 33, 573–601 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGrattan, E., Prescott, E.C.: Unmeasured investment and the puzzling U.S. boom in the 1990s. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2(4), 88–123 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ohanian, L., Raffo, A., Rogerson, R.: Long-term changes in labor supply and taxes: evidence from OECD countries, 1956–2004. J. Monet. Econ. 55(8), 1353–1362 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pecorino, P.: Tax rates and tax revenues in a model of growth through human capital accumulation. J. Monet. Econ. 36, 527–539 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prescott, E.C.: Why do Americans work so much more than Europeans? Fed. Reserve Bank Minneap. Q. Rev. 28(1), 2–13 (2004)Google Scholar
  36. Reichling, F., Whalen, C.: Review of Estimates of the Frisch Elasticity of Labor Supply: Working. Working paper, Congressional Budget Office (2012)Google Scholar
  37. Rogerson, R., Wallenius, J.: Micro and macro elasticities in a life cycle model with taxes. Journal of Economic Theory 144(6), 2277–2292 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saez, E., Slemrod, J., Giertz, S.H.: The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: a critical review. J. Econ. Lit. 50(1), 3–50 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smets, F., Wouters, R.: Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: a bayesian DSGE approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 97(3), 586–606 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmitt-Grohe, S., Uribe, M.: Balanced-budget rules, distortionary taxes, and aggregate instability. J. Polit. Econ. 105(5), 976–1000 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trabandt, M., Uhlig, H.: How Far Are We from the Slippery Slope? The Laffer Curve Revisited. NBER Working Paper, 15343 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Finance and Business Economics, Marshall School of BusinessUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations