# Steepest ascent tariff reform

- 276 Downloads
- 1 Citations

## Abstract

The policy reform literature is primarily concerned with the construction of reforms that yield welfare gains. By contrast, this paper’s contribution is to develop a theoretical concept for which the focus is upon the sizes of welfare gains accruing from policy reforms rather than upon their signs. In undertaking this task, and by focusing on tariff reforms, we introduce the concept of a steepest ascent policy reform, which is a locally optimal reform in the sense that it achieves the highest marginal gain in utility of any feasible local reform. We argue that this reform presents itself as a natural benchmark for the evaluation of the welfare effectiveness of other popular tariff reforms such as the proportional tariff reduction and the concertina rules, since it provides the maximal welfare gain of all possible local reforms. We derive properties of the steepest ascent tariff reform, construct an index to measure the relative welfare effectiveness of any given tariff reform, determine conditions under which proportional and concertina reforms are locally optimal and provide illustrative examples.

### Keywords

Piecemeal tariff policy Locally optimal reforms### JEL Classification

D60 F13 H21### References

- Abe, K.: Tariff reform in a small open economy with public production. Int. Econ. Rev.
**33**, 209–222 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Anderson, J.E., Neary, J.P.: Trade reform with quotas, partial rent retention and tariffs. Econometrica
**60**, 57–76 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Anderson, J.E., Neary, J.P.: A new approach for evaluating trade policies. Rev. Econ. Stud.
**63**, 107–125 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Anderson, J.E., Neary, J.P.: Measuring the Restrictiveness of International Trade Policy. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
- Anderson, J.E., Neary, J.P.: Revenue tariff reform, manuscript. http://www2.bc.edu/james-anderson/RevenueTarReform.pdf (2006)
- Anderson, J.E., Neary, J.P.: Welfare versus market access: the implications of tariff structure for tariff reform. J. Int. Econ.
**71**, 187–205 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Apostol, T.M.: Mathematical Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1957)Google Scholar
- Bovenberg, A.L., Goulder, L.H.: Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general-equilibrium analyses. Am. Econ. Rev.
**86–4**, 985–1000 (1996)Google Scholar - Diewert, W.E.: Optimal tax perturbations. J. Public Econ.
**10**, 139–177 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Diewert, W.E., Turunen-Red, A.H., Woodland, A.D.: Productivity and Pareto-improving changes in taxes and tariffs. Rev. Econ. Stud.
**56**, 199–215 (1989)Google Scholar - Diewert, W.E., Turunen-Red, A.H., Woodland, A.D.: Tariff reform in a small open, multi-household economy with domestic distortions. Int. Econ. Rev.
**32–4**, 937–957 (1991)Google Scholar - Falvey, R.: Revenue enhancing tariff reform. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv
**130**, 175–190 (1994)Google Scholar - Falvey, R., Kreickemeier, U.: Tariff reforms with rigid wages. Econ. Theory
**41–1**, 23–39 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Falvey, R., Kreickemeier, U.: The theory of trade policy and reform. In: Bernhofen, D., Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., Kreickemeier, U. (eds.) Palgrave Handbook in International Trade, pp. 256–294. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2011)Google Scholar
- Fulks, W.: Advanced Calculus, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1969)Google Scholar
- Fukushima, T.: Tariff structure, nontraded goods and theory of piecemeal policy recommendations. Int. Econ. Rev.
**20–2**, 427–435 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nguyen, H.V., Woodland, A.D.: Steepest Ascent Tariff Reform For a Small Open Economy: An Application to Australia, Forthcoming Draft Paper, University of New South Wales (2013)Google Scholar
- Hatta, T.: A recommendation for a better tariff structure. Econometrica
**45–8**, 1859–1869 (1977a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hatta, T.: A theory of piecemeal policy recommendations. Rev. Econ. Stud.
**44**, 1–21 (1977b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kee, H.L., Nicita, A.: Estimating trade restrictiveness indices. Econ. J.
**119**, 172–199 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lloyd, P.J.: A more general theory of price distortions in open economies. J. Int. Econ.
**4**, 365–386 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Meade, J.E.: Trade and Welfare. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1955)Google Scholar
- Neary, P.J.: Trade liberalisation and shadow prices in the presence of tariffs and quotas. Int. Econ. Rev.
**36–3**, 531–554 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Raimondos-Møller, P., Woodland, A.D.: Steepest Ascent Tariff Reform, CESifo Working Paper 1760. CESifo, Munich (2006)Google Scholar
- Raimondos-Møller, P., Woodland, A.D.: Steepest Ascent Tariff Reform Different Objectives and Policy Instruments: University of New South Wales (2012)Google Scholar
- Tirole, J., Guesnerie, R.: Tax reform from the gradient projection viewpoint. J. Public Econ.
**15**, 275–293 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Turunen-Red, A.H., Woodland, A.D.: Strict Pareto improving reforms of tariffs. Econometrica
**59**, 1127–1152 (1991)Google Scholar - Turunen-Red, A.H., Woodland, A.D.: The anatomy of multilateral trade policy reform. In: Lahiri, S. (ed.) Regionalism and Globalization: Theory and Practice. Routledge Contemporary Economic Policy Issues Series (2001)Google Scholar
- Weymark, J.A.: Undominated directions of tax reform. J. Public Econ.
**16**, 343–369 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar