Advertisement

Economic Theory

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 329–351 | Cite as

Global warming and economic externalities

  • Armon Rezai
  • Duncan K. Foley
  • Lance Taylor
Symposium

Abstract

Despite worldwide policy efforts such as the Kyoto Protocol, the emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) remains a negative externality. Economic equilibrium paths in the presence of such an uncorrected externality are inefficient; as a consequence, there is no real economic opportunity cost to correcting this externality by mitigating global warming. Mitigation investment using resources diverted from conventional investments can raise the economic well-being of both current and future generations. The economic literature on GHG emissions misleadingly focuses attention on the intergenerational equity aspects of mitigation by using a hybrid constrained optimal path as the “business-as-usual” benchmark. We calibrate a simple Keynes-Ramsey growth model to illustrate the significant potential Pareto improvement from mitigation investment and to explain the equilibrium concept appropriate to modeling an uncorrected negative externality.

Keywords

Global warming Growth with negative externalities Optimal economic growth 

JEL Classification

D62 O41 Q54 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.: Global Climate Change: A Challenge to Policy. Economists’ Voice (June), 1–5 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. Asheim, G., Mitra, T., Tungodden, B.: Sustainable recursive social welfare function, Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  3. Barker, T.: The economics of dangerous climate change. Clim. Change 173–194 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. Burniaux, J.-M., Oliveira Martins, J.: Carbon leakages: a general equilibrium view, Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Chichilnisky G.: North-South trade and the global environment. Am Econ Rev 84, 851–874 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. Chichilnisky, G.: Sustainable markets with short sales, Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Chichilnisky, G., Eisenberger, P.: Asteroids: assesing catastrophic risks. J Probab Stat 2010 Article ID 954750, 15 p (2010)Google Scholar
  8. Chichilnisky G., Heal G.: Who should abate carbon emission? An international perspective. Econ Let 44, 443–449 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chichilnisky G., Sheeran K.: Saving Kyoto. New Holland, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  10. Chipman, J.S., Tian, G.: Detrimental externalities, pollution rights, and the “Coarse Theorem”. Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  11. Dutta, P.K., Radner, R.: Capital growth in a global warming model will China and India sign a climate treaty? Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  12. Figuieres, C., Tidball, M.: Sustainable exploitation of a natural resource: a satisfying use of chichilnisky’s criterion, Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Foley D.K.: The economic fundamentals of global warming. In: Harris, J.M., Goodwin, N.R. (eds) Twenty-First Century Macroeconomics: Responding to the Climate Challenge, chap. 5., Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham and Northampton (2009)Google Scholar
  14. IPCC.: Climate Change 2007, the Fourth IPCC Assessment Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm (2007). Accessed 10 August 2008
  15. Karp, L., Zhang, J.: Taxes versus quantities for a stock pollutant with endogenous abatement costs and asymmetric information. Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  16. Lauwers, L.: Intergenerational equity, efficiency and constructibility, Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  17. Lecocq, F., Hourcade, J.-C.: Unspoken ethical issues in the climate affair insights from a theoretical analysis of negotiation mandates. Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  18. Nordhaus W.D.: A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. Yale University Press, New Haven (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Nordhaus W.D., Boyer J.: Warming the World. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  20. Ostrom, E.: Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Econ Theory (this issue) (2011)Google Scholar
  21. Rezai A.: Recast the DICE and its policy implications. Macroecon Dyn 14, 275–289 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Samuelson P.A.: A catenary turnpike theorem involving consumption and the golden rule. Am Econ Rev 55, 486–496 (1965)Google Scholar
  23. Shiell M.L., Lyssenko N.: Computing business-as-usual with a representative agent and a pollution externality. J Econ Dyn Control 32, 1543–1568 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stern N.: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  25. Tol R.: The economic effects of climate change. J Econ Prespective 23, 29–51 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SocioeconomicsVienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsNew School for Social ResearchNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations