Transaction costs and planner intervention
- 187 Downloads
In this paper, I examine a two-period general equilibrium model in which transaction costs are incurred whenever financial contracts are traded. These transaction costs are real and convex. The presence of these transaction costs results in a Pareto inefficient equilibrium allocation. Attempting to fix this problem, the planner will intervene by scaling the transaction costs either up or down. The intervention must satisfy fiscal balance meaning that the summed value of transaction costs will remain constant. I prove that over a generic subset of household utility functions and endowments and subject to an upper bound on the number of household types, there exists an open set of planner interventions that lead to a Pareto superior allocation.
KeywordsConstrained suboptimality Convex transaction costs Regularity Policy intervention Anonymity Fiscal balance
JEL ClassificationD53 G11 H21 H23
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Geanakoplos, J., Polemarchakis, H.: Existence, regularity, and constrainted suboptimality of competitive allocations when the asset market is incomplete. In: Heller, W.P., Ross, R.M., Starrett, D.A. (eds.) Uncertainty, Information, and Communication: Essays in Honor of KJ Arrow, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1986)Google Scholar
- Kubler F.: Notes on Numerical Methods to Solve Non-linear Equations, Mimeo. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (2007)Google Scholar
- Villanacci A., Carosi L., Benevieri P., Battinelli A.: Differential Topology and General Equilibrium with Complete and Incomplete Markets. Kluwer, Boston (2002)Google Scholar