Advertisement

Economic Theory

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 151–167 | Cite as

On relative and partial risk attitudes: theory and implications

  • W. Henry ChiuEmail author
  • Louis Eeckhoudt
  • Beatrice Rey
Research Article

Abstract

This paper develops context-free interpretations for the relative and partial Nth degree risk attitude measures and show that various conditions on theses measures are utility characterizations of the effects of scaling general stochastic changes in different settings. It is then shown that these characterizations can be applied to generalize comparative statics results in a number of important problems, including precautionary savings, optimal portfolio choice, and competitive firms under price uncertainty.

Keywords

Nth degree risk Stochastic dominance Relative risk aversion Comparative statics Risk apportionment 

JEL Classification

D81 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cheng H., Magill M.J., Shafer W.: Some results on comparative statics under uncertainty. Int Econ Rev 28, 493–507 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiu W.H., Madden P.: Crime, punishment, and background risks. J Econ Behav Org 62, 543–555 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi G., Kim I., Snow A.: Comparative statics predictions for changes in uncertainty in the portfolio and savings problem. Bull Econ Res 53, 61–72 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dionne G., Gollier C.: Comparative statics under multiple sources of risk with applications to insurance demand. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Theory 17, 21–33 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eeckhoudt L., Etner J., Schroyen F.: The value of relative risk aversion and prudence: a context-free interpretation. Math Soc Sci 58, 1–7 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eeckhoudt L., Gollier C.: The impact of prudence on optimal prevention. Econ Theory 26, 989–994 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eeckhoudt L., Schlesinger H.: Putting risk in its proper place. Am Econ Rev 96, 280–289 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eeckhoudt L., Schlesinger H.: Changes in risk and the demand for saving. J Monet Econ 55, 1329–1336 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eeckhoudt L., Schlesinger H., Tsetlin I.: Apportioning of risk via stochastic dominance. J Econ Theory 144, 994–1003 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekern S.: Increasing Nth degree risk. Econ Lett 6, 329–333 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fishburn P.C., Porter R.B.: Optimal portfolios with one safe and one risky asset. Manag Sci 22, 1064–1073 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gabszewicz J.J., Poddar S.: Demand fluctuations and capacity utilization under duopoly. Econ Theory 10, 131–146 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hadar J.: A note on beneficial changes in random variables. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Theory 17, 171–179 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadar J., Seo T.K.: The effects of shifts in a return distribution on optimal portfolios. Int Econ Rev 31, 721–736 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey C.R., Siddique A.: Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. J Finance 55, 1263–1295 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ingersoll J.E.: Theory of Financial Decision Making. Rowman & Littlefield, New Jersey (1987)Google Scholar
  17. Leland H.E.: Saving and uncertainty: the precautionary demand for saving. Q J Econ 82, 465–473 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Menezes C.F., Geiss C., Tressler J.: Increasing downside risk. Am Econ Rev 70, 921–932 (1980)Google Scholar
  19. Menezes C.F., Hanson D.L.: On the theory of risk aversion. Int Econ Rev 11, 481–487 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menezes C., Wang X.H.: Increasing outer risk. J Math Econ 41, 875–886 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer J: Beneficial changes in random variables under multiple sources of risk and their comparative statics. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Theory 17, 7–19 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer D.J., Meyer J.: Relative risk aversion: what do we know? J Risk Uncertain 31, 243–262 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pratt J.W.: Risk aversion in the small and the large. Econometrica 32, 122–136 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothschild M., Stiglitz J.: Increasing risk I: a definition. J Econ Theory 2, 225–243 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rothschild M., Stiglitz J.: Increasing risk II: its economic consequences. J Econ Theory 2, 225–243 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sandmo A.: On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty. Am Econ Rev 61, 65–73 (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Henry Chiu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Louis Eeckhoudt
    • 2
    • 3
  • Beatrice Rey
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Economics, School of Social SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.IESEG School of Management, LEMLilleFrance
  3. 3.CORELouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  4. 4.Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, LSAFLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations