Economic Theory

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 475–501 | Cite as

Collateral premia and risk sharing under limited commitment

Research Article

Abstract

A competitive general equilibrium model with complete collateralized contracts under limited commitment is proposed and analyzed. With limited aggregate collateral, risk sharing is imperfect. There exists a minimal spanning set of finite collateralized contracts that generates the feasible space and that contains more than the complete set of collateralized Arrow securities. Examples show that exogenously restricting feasible contracts has a significant impact on agents’ welfare. I prove that constrained optimal allocations can be decentralized as a general equilibrium with collateral constraints, and vice versa. Because a capital good serves as collateral, it has an additional value, called collateral premium. The collateral premium is zero if and only if risk sharing is perfect. This is a testable implication of the model.

Keywords

Collateral premium Complete collateralized contracts General equilibrium Limited commitment Endogenous incomplete markets 

JEL Classification

D52 D53 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiyagari S.: Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving. Q J Econ 109(3), 659–684 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez F., Jermann U.: Efficiency, equilibrium, and asset pricing with risk of default. Econometrica 68(4), 775–797 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araujo A., Fajardo J., Páscoa M.: Endogenous collateral. J Math Econ 41(4–5), 439–462 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araujo A., Monteiro P., Páscoa M.: Incomplete markets, continuum of states and default. Econ Theory 11(1), 205–213 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Araujo A., Páscoa M.: Bankruptcy in a model of unsecured claims. Econ Theory 20(3), 455–481 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow K.: The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing. Rev Econ Stud 31(2), 91–96 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binswanger H., Deininger K., Feder G.: Power, distortions, revolt and reform in agricultural land relations. Handbook Dev Econ 3(Part 2), 2659–2772 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caballero R., Krishnamurthy A.: International and domestic collateral constraints in a model of emerging market crises. J Monet Econ 48(3), 513–548 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubey P., Geanakoplos J., Shubik M.: Default and punishment in general equilibrium. Econometrica 73(1), 1–37 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fostel A., Geanakoplos J.: Collateral restrictions and liquidity under-supply: a simple model. Econ Theory 35(3), 441–467 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geanakoplos, J.: Promises promises. In: Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. 27, pp. 285–320. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)Google Scholar
  12. Geanakoplos, J.: Liquidity, default, and crashes. In: Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications. Eighth World Congress (2003)Google Scholar
  13. Geanakoplos, J., Zame, W.: Collateralized asset markets. Technical report, UCLA Working Paper (2007)Google Scholar
  14. Heaton J., Lucas D.: Evaluating the effects of incomplete markets on risk sharing and asset pricing. J Political Econ 104(3), 443 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holmstrom B., Tirole J.: LAPM: a liquidity-based asset pricing model. J Finan 56(5), 1837–1867 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kehoe T., Levine D.: Debt-constrained asset markets. Rev Econ Stud 60(4), 865–888 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kilenthong, W.T.: Essays on general equilibrium with limited commitment. PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago (2006, June)Google Scholar
  18. Kilenthong, W.T., Townsend, R.M.: Market based, segregated exchanges in securities with default risk. UCSB Working Paper (2009)Google Scholar
  19. Kiyotaki N., Moore J.: Credit cycles. J Political Econ 105(2), 211–248 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kocherlakota N.R.: Implications of efficient risk sharing without commitment. Rev Econ Stud 63(4), 595–609 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krasa S., Sharma T., Villamil A.: Bankruptcy and firm finance. Econ Theory 36(2), 239–266 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krishnamurthy A.: Collateral constraints and the amplification mechanism. J Econ Theory 111(2), 277–292 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kubler F., Schmedders K.: Stationary equilibria in asset-pricing models with incomplete markets and collateral. Econometrica 71(6), 1767–1793 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ligon E., Thomas J., Worrall T.: Informal insurance arrangements with limited commitment: theory and evidence from village economies. Rev Econ Stud 69(1), 209–244 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lustig, H.: The market price of aggregate risk and the wealth distribution. UCLA Working Paper (2007)Google Scholar
  26. Magill M., Quinzii M.: Theory of Incomplete Markets. MIT Press, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  27. Milgrom P., Segal I.: Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70(2), 583–601 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Negishi T.: Welfare Economics and Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Metroeconomica 12(2–3), 92–97 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prescott E.S., Townsend R.M.: Firms as clubs in walrasian markets with private information. J Political Econ 114(4), 644–671 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Radner R.: Competitive equilibrium under uncertainty. Econometrica 36(1), 31–58 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ray D.: Development Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)Google Scholar
  32. Sundaram R.: A First Course in Optimization Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  33. Townsend R.: Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J Econ Theory 21(2), 265–293 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the Thai Chamber of CommerceBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations