Economic Theory

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 9–25 | Cite as

Expected utility theory from the frequentist perspective

Symposium

Abstract

We present an axiomatization of expected utility from the frequentist perspective. It starts with a preference relation on the set of infinite sequences with limit relative frequencies. We consider three axioms parallel to the ones for the von Neumann–Morgenstern (vN–M) expected utility theory. Limit relative frequencies correspond to probability values in lotteries in the vN–M theory. This correspondence is used to show that each of our axioms is equivalent to the corresponding vN–M axiom in the sense that the former is an exact translation of the latter. As a result, a representation theorem is established: The preference relation is represented by an average of utilities with weights given by the relative frequencies.

Keywords

Objective probability Expected utility theory Frequentist theory of probability Decision theory 

JEL Classification

D80 D81 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anscombe F.J., Aumann R.: A definition of subjective probability. Ann Math Stat 34, 199–205 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbera S., Hammond P.J., Seidl C.: Handbook of Utility Theory: Principles, vol. 1. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)Google Scholar
  3. Downey R., Hirschfeldt D., Nies A., Terwijn S.: Calibrating randomness. Bull Symb Logic 12, 411–491 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fishburn P.C.: Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  5. Gillies D.: Philosophical Theories of Probability. Routlegde, London (2000)Google Scholar
  6. Hu, T.-W.: Complexity and Mixed Strategy Equilibria. http://taiweihu.weebly.com/research.html (2009)
  7. Kaneko M., Kline J.J.: Inductive game theory: a basic scenario. J Math Econ 44, 1332–1363 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaneko, M., Kline, J.J.: Transpersonal understanding through social roles, and emergence of cooperation. Tsukuba University, Department of Social Systems and Management Discussion Paper Series, No. 1228 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. Martin-Löf P.: The definition of random sequences. Inform Control 9, 602–619 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ville J.: Ĕtude Critique de la Concept du Collectif. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1939)Google Scholar
  11. von Mises R.: Probability, Statistics, and Truth, 2nd revised English edition. Dover, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  12. von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University, Princeton (1944)Google Scholar
  13. Wald, A.: Die widerspruchsfreiheit des kollektivsbegriffes. In: Wald: Selected Papers in Statistics and Probability, pp. 25–41, 1955. New York: McGraw-Hill (1938)Google Scholar
  14. Weatherford R.: Philosophical Foundations of Probability Theory. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1982)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations