- First Online:
- 152 Downloads
According to liberal egalitarian ethics, individuals should be rewarded for factors under their control (the principle of responsibility), but not for factors outside their control (the principle of equalization). The paper analyses the effects of two requirements on how to reward effort within a liberal egalitarian framework: the requirement of equal reward and the requirement of solidarity. We show that it is impossible to establish a framework that satisfies the principle of equalization in all respects, and that a generalized version of the egalitarian equivalent mechanism is a very plausible liberal egalitarian approach.
KeywordsLiberal egalitarianism Responsibility Equalization Egalitarian equivalent mechanism
JEL ClassificationD63 D71
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dworkin, R.: What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philos Publ Affairs 10, 283–345 (1981)Google Scholar
- Fleurbaey, M.: The requisites of equal opportunity. In: Barnett, W.A., Moulin, H., Salles, M., Schofield, N. (eds) Social Choice, Welfare, and Ethics., pp. 37–54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
- Le Grand, J.: Equity and Choice. Harper Collins, UK (1991)Google Scholar
- Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1971)Google Scholar
- Roemer, J.E.: A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian planner. Philos Publ Affairs 22, 146–166 (1993)Google Scholar
- Roemer, J.E.: Theories of Distributive Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
- Roemer, J.E.: Equality of Opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar